Literature DB >> 23499345

Sonoporation as a cellular stress: induction of morphological repression and developmental delays.

Xian Chen1, Jennifer M F Wan, Alfred C H Yu.   

Abstract

For sonoporation to be established as a drug/gene delivery paradigm, it is essential to account for the biological impact of this membrane permeation strategy on living cells. Here we provide new insight into the cellular impact of sonoporation by demonstrating in vitro that this way of permeating the plasma membrane may inadvertently induce repressive cellular features even while enhancing exogenous molecule uptake. Both suspension-type (HL-60) and monolayer (ZR-75-30) cells were considered in this investigation, and they were routinely exposed to 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound (pulse length, 100 cycles; pulse repetition frequency, 1 kHz; exposure period, 60 s) with calibrated field profile (spatial-averaged peak negative pressure, 0.45 MPa) and in the presence of microbubbles (cell:bubble ratio, 10:1). The post-exposure morphology of sonoporated cells (identified as those with calcein internalization) was examined using confocal microscopy, and their cell cycle progression kinetics were analyzed using flow cytometry. Results show that for both cell types investigated, sonoporated cells exhibited membrane shrinkage and intra-cellular lipid accumulation over a 2-h period. Also, as compared with normal cells, the deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis duration of sonoporated cells was significantly lengthened, indicative of a delay in cell cycle progression. These features are known to be characteristics of a cellular stress response, suggesting that sonoporation indeed constitutes as a stress to living cells. This issue may need to be addressed in optimizing sonoporation for drug/gene delivery purposes. On the other hand, it raises opportunities for developing other therapeutic applications via sonoporation.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23499345     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  13 in total

1.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Ruen Shan Leow; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Laser-Activated Polymeric Microcapsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: In Vitro Feasibility.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Tom van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Emilie Blazejewski; Gert Veldhuis; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Single-site sonoporation disrupts actin cytoskeleton organization.

Authors:  Xian Chen; Ruen Shan Leow; Yaxin Hu; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Sonoporation: Gene transfer using ultrasound.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Makoto Sueishi
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2013-12-26

5.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Oxidative Stress Alters the Morphological Responses of Myoblasts to Single-Site Membrane Photoporation.

Authors:  Xinxing Duan; Jennifer M F Wan; Arthur F T Mak
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Intracellular Signaling in Key Pathways Is Induced by Treatment with Ultrasound and Microbubbles in a Leukemia Cell Line, but Not in Healthy Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.

Authors:  Ragnhild Haugse; Anika Langer; Stein-Erik Gullaksen; Silje Maria Sundøy; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; Spiros Kotopoulis; Emmet McCormack
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Sonoporation generates downstream cellular impact after membrane resealing.

Authors:  Xinxing Duan; Qian Zhou; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Low-Intensity Sonoporation-Induced Intracellular Signalling of Pancreatic Cancer Cells, Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Ragnhild Haugse; Anika Langer; Elisa Thodesen Murvold; Daniela Elena Costea; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; Odd Helge Gilja; Spiros Kotopoulis; Gorka Ruiz de Garibay; Emmet McCormack
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 10.  The cellular response to plasma membrane disruption for nanomaterial delivery.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Winnok H De Vos; Gaëlle Houthaeve; Stefaan C De Smedt
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2022-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.