Literature DB >> 23499002

The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Julio Martín1, Ana Cervero, Pere Mir, Jose Antonio Martinez-Conejero, Jose Antonio Conejero Martinez, Antonio Pellicer, Carlos Simón.   

Abstract

Largely because of efforts required to complete the Human Genome Project, DNA sequencing has undergone a steady transformation with still-ongoing developments of high-throughput sequencing machines for which the cost per reaction is falling drastically. Similarly, the fast-changing landscape of reproductive technologies has been improved by genetic approaches. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening were established more than two decades ago for selecting genetically normal embryos to avoid inherited diseases and to give the highest potential to achieve stable pregnancies. Most recent additions to the IVF practices (blastocyst/trophectoderm biopsy, embryo vitrification) and adoption of new genetics tools such as array comparative genome hybridization have allowed setting up more precise and efficient programs for clinical embryo diagnosis. Nevertheless, there is always room for improvements. Remarkably, a recent explosion in the release of advanced sequencing benchtop platforms, together with a certain maturity of bioinformatics tools, has set the target goal of sequencing individual cells for embryo diagnosis to be a realistically feasible scenario for the near future. Next-generation sequencing technology should provide the opportunity to simultaneously analyze single-gene disorders and perform an extensive comprehensive chromosome screening/diagnosis by concurrently sequencing, counting, and accurately assembling millions of DNA reads.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23499002     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

Review 1.  High Throughput Sequencing and Assessing Disease Risk.

Authors:  Shannon M Rego; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Samuel A Wells; Sylvia L Asa; Henning Dralle; Rossella Elisei; Douglas B Evans; Robert F Gagel; Nancy Lee; Andreas Machens; Jeffrey F Moley; Furio Pacini; Friedhelm Raue; Karin Frank-Raue; Bruce Robinson; M Sara Rosenthal; Massimo Santoro; Martin Schlumberger; Manisha Shah; Steven G Waguespack
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 3.  Criteria for Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Different Guidelines, Appraising their Suitability in the Omani Arab Population.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Rasadi; Khalid Al-Waili; Hilal Ali Al-Sabti; Ali Al-Hinai; Khamis Al-Hashmi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Yajnavalka Banerjee
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Kassie J Hyde; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  To mask or not to mask mosaicism? The impact of reporting embryo mosaicism on reproductive potential.

Authors:  A Armstrong; J Miller; M Quinn; A V Nguyen; L Kwan; L Kroener
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Juanjuan Xu; Rui Fang; Li Chen; Daozhen Chen; Jian-Ping Xiao; Weimin Yang; Honghua Wang; Xiaoqing Song; Ting Ma; Shiping Bo; Chong Shi; Jun Ren; Lei Huang; Li-Yi Cai; Bing Yao; X Sunney Xie; Sijia Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Hua Jin; Lian Liu; Jianqiao Liu; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  A healthy delivery of twins by assisted reproduction followed by preimplantation genetic screening in a woman with X-linked dominant incontinentia pigmenti.

Authors:  Myung Joo Kim; Sang Woo Lyu; Hyun Ha Seok; Ji Eun Park; Sung Han Shim; Tae Ki Yoon
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2014-12-31

9.  Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yueqiu Tan; Xuyang Yin; Shuoping Zhang; Hui Jiang; Ke Tan; Jian Li; Bo Xiong; Fei Gong; Chunlei Zhang; Xiaoyu Pan; Fang Chen; Shengpei Chen; Chun Gong; Changfu Lu; Keli Luo; Yifan Gu; Xiuqing Zhang; Wei Wang; Xun Xu; Gábor Vajta; Lars Bolund; Huanming Yang; Guangxiu Lu; Yutao Du; Ge Lin
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  Single cell segmental aneuploidy detection is compromised by S phase.

Authors:  Eftychia Dimitriadou; Niels Van der Aa; Jiqiu Cheng; Thierry Voet; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.