Literature DB >> 23497915

Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.

Bin Xu1, Yanping Li.   

Abstract

This article reports on a novel strategy of continuous ovarian stimulation in a poor responder with two oocyte retrievals within the follicular and luteal phases of the same menstrual cycle. It also reviews studies of flexible ovarian stimulation. A patient aged 41 years diagnosed as infertile with low ovarian reserve sought IVF treatment. A minimal ovarian simulation protocol was commenced with use of low-dose urinary FSH (150IU/day) from day 3, combined with using clomiphene citrate (50-100mg) when the biggest follicle reached 10mm in diameter to prevent ovulation. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist was administered on day 15 when the lead follicles reached 18 mm in diameter. The first ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval was performed 21 h later; however, no ovum was obtained. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation was started 2 days later. The second oocyte retrieval was performed 25 h after human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Finally, one mature oocyte resulting in a cleavage embryo (8-cell, grade 2) was obtained. The case demonstrates that it is feasible to obtain mature oocytes and good embryos from luteal-phase stimulation. Continuous stimulation during the follicular and luteal phase can be a solution for poor ovarian response. Ovarian stimulation may be performed flexibly in special circumstances. This article reports on a novel strategy of continuous ovarian stimulation on a poor responder during the follicular and luteal phases of the same menstrual cycle with two oocyte retrievals. It also reviews studies of flexible ovarian stimulation. In our case, a patient, aged 41, who was diagnosed as infertile with very poor ovarian function, sought therapy for IVF. Antral follicles and basic hormones were evaluated on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. The stimulation cycle was commenced with use of 150IU/day urinary FSH from day 3, combined with clomiphene citrate and ibuprofen in the late follicular and luteal phases to prevent ovulation. Oocyte retrieval was attempted twice. We performed luteal-phase ovarian stimulation continuously 2 days after the first failed oocyte retrieval during the follicular phase. Finally, one mature oocyte resulting in a cleavage embryo (8-cell, grade 2) was obtained after the luteal phase stimulation and retrieval, redeeming the previous unsuccessful oocyte retrieval. The case demonstrates that it is practical to obtain mature oocytes and good embryos from maintaining luteal-phase stimulation. For poor ovarian response, continuous stimulation during the follicular and luteal phases can be a solution. The literature review summarizes the clinical outcomes and parameters of flexible ovarian stimulation previously reported, including luteal-phase oocyte retrieval plus in-vitro maturation, ovarian stimulation initiated during the follicular or luteal phase and random-start stimulation. With knowledge gleaned from the case and review of studies, ovarian stimulation may be performed flexibly in special circumstances.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23497915     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan A García-Velasco; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sfakianoudis Konstantinos; Tsioulou Petroula; Maziotis Evangelos; Giannelou Polina; Glava Argyro; Grigoriadis Sokratis; Rapani Anna; Nezos Andrianos; Pantou Agni; Koutsilieris Michael; Pantos Konstantinos; Mastorakos George; Simopoulou Mara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Development of a predictive model for luteal phase oocyte retrieval in poor responders undergoing natural cycle IVF.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Dionysios Galatis; Evangelos Maziotis; Agni Pantou; Polina Giannelou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Panagiotis Tzonis; Theodora Griva; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Anastasios Philippou; Michael Koutsilieris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Yan Wu; Fu-Chun Zhao; Yong Sun; Pei-Shu Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4.

Authors:  Thor Haahr; Carlos Dosouto; Carlo Alviggi; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Ongoing pregnancy and healthy live births following very short ovarian stimulation of incidentally observed big antral follicles in oligoamenorrheic patients with extremely decreased ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Volkan Turan; Meltem Sonmezer; Murat Sonmezer
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-04-27

7.  DuoStim - a reproducible strategy to obtain more oocytes and competent embryos in a short time-frame aimed at fertility preservation and IVF purposes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Cecilia Petriglia; Alessandro Conforti; Carlo Alviggi; Nicolò Ubaldi; Sergio Ledda; Susanna Ferrero; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.384

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.