Literature DB >> 23497802

A new fracture assessment approach coupling HR-pQCT imaging and fracture mechanics-based finite element modeling.

Ani Ural1, Peter Bruno, Bin Zhou, X Tony Shi, X Edward Guo.   

Abstract

A new fracture assessment approach that combines HR-pQCT imaging with fracture mechanics-based finite element modeling was developed to evaluate distal radius fracture load. Twenty distal radius images obtained from postmenopausal women (fracture, n=10; nonfracture, n=10) were processed to obtain a cortical and a whole bone model for each subject. The geometrical properties of each model were evaluated and the corresponding fracture load was determined under realistic fall conditions using cohesive finite element modeling. The results showed that the whole bone fracture load can be estimated based on the cortical fracture load for nonfracture (R(2)=0.58, p=0.01) and pooled data (R(2)=0.48, p<0.001) but not for the fracture group. The portion of the whole bone fracture load carried by the cortical bone increased with increasing cortical fracture load (R(2)≥0.5, p<0.05) indicating that a more robust cortical bone carries a larger percentage of whole bone fracture load. Cortical thickness was found to be the best predictor of both cortical and whole bone fracture load for all groups (R(2) range: 0.49-0.96, p<0.02) with the exception of fracture group whole bone fracture load showing the predictive capability of cortical geometrical properties in determining whole bone fracture load. Fracture group whole bone fracture load was correlated with trabecular thickness (R(2)=0.4, p<0.05) whereas the nonfracture and the pooled group did not show any correlation with the trabecular parameters. In summary, this study introduced a new modeling approach that coupled HR-pQCT imaging with fracture mechanics-based finite element simulations, incorporated fracture toughness and realistic fall loading conditions in the models, and showed the significant contribution of the cortical compartment to the overall fracture load of bone. Our results provide more insight into the fracture process in bone and may lead to improved fracture load predictions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23497802      PMCID: PMC3641900          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  45 in total

1.  Introduction and evaluation of a gray-value voxel conversion technique.

Authors:  J Homminga; R Huiskes; B Van Rietbergen; P Rüegsegger; H Weinans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images.

Authors:  W Pistoia; B van Rietbergen; E-M Lochmüller; C A Lill; F Eckstein; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Harun H Bayraktar; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Radius bone strength in bending, compression, and falling and its correlation with clinical densitometry at multiple sites.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Christoph A Lill; Volker Kuhn; Erich Schneider; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Fracture toughness is dependent on bone location--a study of the femoral neck, femoral shaft, and the tibial shaft.

Authors:  C U Brown; Y N Yeni; T L Norman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-03-05

6.  Predicting the failure load of the distal radius.

Authors:  Monique E Muller; Colin E Webber; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Mechanical consequences of different scenarios for simulated bone atrophy and recovery in the distal radius.

Authors:  W Pistoia; B van Rietbergen; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Colles' fracture and subsequent hip fracture risk.

Authors:  R A Owen; L J Melton; D M Ilstrup; K A Johnson; B L Riggs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Nicolas Vilayphiou; Stephanie Boutroy; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Bert Van Rietbergen; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modelling of bone fracture and strength at different length scales: a review.

Authors:  Fereshteh A Sabet; Ahmad Raeisi Najafi; Elham Hamed; Iwona Jasiuk
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Specimen-specific vertebral fracture modeling: a feasibility study using the extended finite element method.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Xiaoliang Qin; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Kai-Nan An; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Coupling Musculoskeletal Dynamics and Subject-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Femoral Cortical Bone Failure after Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Fuhao Mo; Haotian Zhang; Siqi Zhao; Zhi Xiao; Tang Liu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 4.  Exercise Early and Often: Effects of Physical Activity and Exercise on Women's Bone Health.

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Megan E Mancuso; Tiffiny A Butler; Joshua E Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.