| Literature DB >> 23497378 |
Mohamed Talaat Abdel Aziz1, Ibrahim Naguib El Ibrashy, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Ameen Mahmoud Rezq, Mohamed Abdel Aziz Wassef, Hanan Hassan Fouad, Hanan Hosni Ahmed, Dina A Sabry, Heba Mohamed Shawky, Rania Elsayed Hussein.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Curcumin exhibits anti-diabetic activities, induces heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and is an inhibitor of transcriptional co-activator p300. A novel water soluble curcumin derivative (NCD) has been developed to overcome low invivo bioavailability of curcumin. We evaluated the effect of the NCD on signaling mechanisms involved in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and studied whether its action is mediated via inducible HO-1.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23497378 PMCID: PMC3602235 DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-5-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Classification of studied groups
| Control: 20 rats. | |
| Pathological control: Twenty streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats | |
| Twenty control rats that received a daily oral dose of the water soluble curcumin derivative (NCD) at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight for 45 days. | |
| Twenty diabetic rats that received a daily oral dose of the NCD at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight for 45 days after the induction of DM. | |
| Twenty diabetic rats that received a daily oral dose of the NCD at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight for 45 days after induction of DM and a weekly intraperitoneal (i.p.) dose of HO-1 inhibitor, ZnPP IX (10 μmol/Kg dissolved in sodium hydroxide 0.1 N and sodium chloride 0.9% and pH adjusted to pH 7.4) for 6 weeks. | |
| Twenty diabetic rats that received a weekly i.p. dose of HO-1 inhibitor, ZnPP IX (10 μmol/Kg dissolved in sodium hydroxide 0.1 N and sodium chloride 0.9% and pH adjusted to pH 7.4) for 6 weeks. | |
| Twenty diabetic rats that received a daily oral dose of pure curcumin at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight for 45 days after induction of DM. |
Oligonucleotide primers sequence used for real-time PCR
| Forward primer: 5′- GCTGCGCTGGAGGAAGCCAA--3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′-TTCTCGCAGCGCGCCTGAAA-3′ | |
| Forward primer: 5′- GCCTGAAGGGTTTTGGGCAGCA-3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′-ACCGTCACAGCCCAAGCGAC-3′ | |
| Forward primer: 5′-ACAACCTCTTGCCACGCCCG-3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′-AGGGGAGCGCCCCATTTCCT-3′ | |
| Forward primer: 5′- GATGGGCATGACAGACGAGAAGGGA-3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′-GCCAATGACTGGGCCGACTGG-3′ | |
| Forward primer: 5′-GAGCGCCCACAGCTCGACAG-3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′-GTGGGCCACCAGCAGCTCAG-3′ | |
| Forward primer: 5′-CCTTCCTGGGCATGGAGTCCT-3′ | |
| Reverse primer: 5′- GGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTTC-3′ |
Physiological parameters of the studied groups
| 166(a) ± 7 | 173(a) ± 6 | 122(b) ± 5 | 149©(d) ± 9 | 139(d) ± 6 | 118(e)(b) ± 6 | 140(f)(d) ± 5 | |
| 118(a) ± 8 | 121(a) ± 8 | 145(b) ± 7 | 128(a)(d) ± 8 | 130(a)(d) ± 7 | 147(e)(b) ± 6 | 130(a)(f)(d) ± 05 | |
| 92(a) ± 5.3 | 93.3(a) ± 4.7 | 59(b) ± 6.0 | 75©(d) ± 4.5 | 70.6(d) ± 5.3 | 57(e)(b) ± 4.6 | 73(f)(d) ± 4.1 | |
| 139(a) ± 7.4 | 137.6(a) ± 7.2 | 101.2(b) ± 9.4 | 134.3(a) ± 5.2 | 133(a)(d) ± 5.2 | 94.3(b)(e) ± 8.6 | 128.6(a)(f) ± 8.5 |
LV dp/dt: left ventricular delta pressure/delta time (contractility index).
LVDP: Left ventricular developed pressure.
Groups that have similar letters are not significant while groups having different letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Results are presented as mean ± SD.
Biochemical parameters in studied groups
| 92 ± 6.9 | 91 ± 5.9 | 307* ± 31.4 | 183*§ ± 21.2 | 192*§ ± 6.4 | 342*§ ± 25.5 | 217*§#• ± 20.5 | |
| 1.10 ± 0.19 | 1.58*§ ± 0.36 | 0.47* ± 0.18 | 0.80*§ ± 0.22 | 0.71*§ ± 0.17 | 0.29*§ ± 0.12 | 0.60*#• ± 0.09 | |
| 5.4 ± 0.7 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 13.0* ± 1.0 | 11.3*§ ± 0.7 | 11.0*§ ± 1.4 | 12.6* ± 1.3 | 11.8* ± 0.5 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD.
*Values differ significantly from control (p < 0.05). #Values differ significantly from Diabetic + NCD (p < 0.05).
§Values differ significantly from diabetic (p < 0.05). • Values differ significantly from Diabetic + ZnPP (p < 0.05).
Comparison between the HO activity levels (pmol bilirubin/mg protein/h) of studied groups
| 857.1 ± 156.6 | 1093* ± 153.7 | 1287.5* ± 204.8 | 1853.1*§ ± 208.1 | 1535 *§# ± 201.1 | 918.7§ ± 119.3 | 1390.6*# ± 110.1 | |
| 544.3 ± 63.0 | 739.5* ± 82.3 | 1060 * ± 90.5 | 1593.7* § ± 117.8 | 1206*§# ± 148.4 | 793.7*§ ± 125.8 | 1393.7* §#• ± 214.5 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD.
*Values differ significantly from control (p < 0.05). #Values differ significantly from Diabetic + NCD (p < 0.05).
§Values differ significantly from diabetic animals (p < 0.05). • Values differ significantly from Diabetic + ZnPP (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Comparison between the heme oxygenase-1 gene expression of studied groups. Results are presented as mean ± SD. *Values differ significantly from control p < 0.001. §Values differ significantly from diabetic p < 0.001. #Values differ significantly from diabetic + NCD p < 0.001. • Values differ significantly from diabetic + inhibitor p < 0.001.
Figure 2Comparison between the p300 gene expression of studied groups. Results are presented as mean ± SD. *Values differ significantly from control p < 0.001. §Values differ significantly from diabetic p < 0.001. #Values differ significantly from diabetic + NCD p < 0.001. • Values differ significantly from diabetic + inhibitor p < 0.001.
Figure 3Comparison between the gene expression of molecular markers of studied groups. Results are presented as mean ± SD. *Values differ significantly from control p < 0.001. §Values differ significantly from diabetic p < 0.001. #Values differ significantly from diabetic + NCD p < 0.001. • Values differ significantly from diabetic + inhibitor p < 0.001.