Literature DB >> 23496876

Short term modulation of trunk neuromuscular responses following spinal manipulation: a control group study.

Marie-Pierre Harvey1, Martin Descarreaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent musculoskeletal conditions in industrialized countries and its economic impact is important. Spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) is believed to be a valid approach in the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP. It has also been shown that SMT can modulate the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the paraspinal muscle. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a group of patients with low back pain, the persistence of changes observed in trunk neuromuscular responses after a spinal manipulation (SMT).
METHODS: Sixty adult participants with LBP performed a block of 5 flexion-extension movements. Participants in the experimental group (n=30) received lumbar SMT whereas participants in the control group (n=30) were positioned similarly for the treatment but did not receive SMT. Blocks of flexion-extension movements were repeated immediately after the manipulation as well as 5 and 30 minutes after SMT (or control position). EMG activity of paraspinal muscles was recorded at L2 and L5 level and kinematic data were collected to evaluate the lumbo-pelvic kinematics. Pain intensity was noted after each block. Normalized EMG, pain intensity and lumbo-pelvic kinematics were compared across experimental conditions.
RESULTS: Participants from the control group showed a significant increase in EMG activity during the last block (30 min) of flexion-extension trials in both flexion and full-flexion phases at L2. Increase in VAS scores was also observed in the last 2 blocks (5 min and 30 min) in the control group. No significant group x time interaction was seen at L5. No significant difference was observed in the lumbo-pelvic kinematics.
CONCLUSION: Changes in trunk neuromuscular control following HVLA spinal manipulation may reduce sensitization or muscle fatigue effects related to repetitive movement. Future studies should investigate short term changes in neuromuscular components, tissue properties and clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23496876      PMCID: PMC3602072          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  28 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998.

Authors:  B F Walker
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Immediate effects of a high-velocity spine manipulation in paraspinal muscles activity of nonspecific chronic low-back pain subjects.

Authors:  Eduardo Bicalho; João Antônio Palma Setti; Jones Macagnan; José Luis Rivas Cano; Elisangela Ferretti Manffra
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-05-05

4.  Variability of force magnitude and force duration in manual and instrument-based manipulation techniques.

Authors:  Gregory N Kawchuk; Narasimha G Prasad; Randall C McLeod; Tasha Liddle; Tianye Li; Qiaohao Zhu
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The effect of spinal manipulation on the efficacy of a rehabilitation protocol for patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bernadette Murphy; Heidi Haavik Taylor; Paul Marshall
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

Authors:  J G Pickar; P S Bolton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Effect of experimental low back pain on neuromuscular control of the trunk in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jean-Daniel Dubois; Mathieu Piché; Vincent Cantin; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain.

Authors:  M A Esola; P W McClure; G K Fitzgerald; S Siegler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Changes in the flexion-relaxation response induced by hip extensor and erector spinae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Martin Descarreaux; Danik Lafond; Vincent Cantin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Flexion-relaxation response to cyclic lumbar flexion.

Authors:  Michael W Olson; Li Li; Moshe Solomonow
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of a Sacroiliac Belt on Pain and Functional Impairment in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  John S Ward
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  Comparison between high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation and muscle energy technique on pain and trunk neuromuscular postural control in male workers with chronic low back pain: A randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Leandro A Sturion; Alexandre H Nowotny; Fabrice Barillec; Gilles Barette; Gabriela K Santos; Fellipe A Teixeira; Karen P Fernandes; Rubens da Silva
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Optimization of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Protocols: A Factorial Randomized Trial Within a Multiphase Optimization Framework.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Jason Sharpe; Tom Greene; Elizabeth Lane; Maliheh Hadizadeh; Molly McFadden; Douglas Santillo; Jedidiah Farley; Jake Magel; Anne Thackeray; Gregory Kawchuk
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.383

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.