Literature DB >> 33309783

Optimization of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Protocols: A Factorial Randomized Trial Within a Multiphase Optimization Framework.

Julie M Fritz1, Jason Sharpe2, Tom Greene3, Elizabeth Lane2, Maliheh Hadizadeh4, Molly McFadden5, Douglas Santillo6, Jedidiah Farley2, Jake Magel2, Anne Thackeray2, Gregory Kawchuk4.   

Abstract

Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common nonpharmacological treatment for low back pain (LBP). Although generally supported by systematic reviews and practice guidelines, clinical trials evaluating SMT have been characterized by small effect sizes. This study adopts a Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework to examine individual components of an SMT delivery protocol using a single-blind trial with the goal of identifying and optimizing a multicomponent SMT protocol. We enrolled 241 participants with LBP. All participants received 2 SMT treatment sessions in the first week then were randomly assigned additional treatment based on a fully factorial design. The 3 randomized treatment components provided in twice weekly sessions over 3 weeks were multifidus activating exercise, spinal mobilizing exercise, and additional SMT dose. Primary outcomes included clinical (Oswestry Disability Index, numeric pain intensity rating) and mechanistic (spinal stiffness, multifidus muscle activation) measures assessed at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 weeks. Significant differences were found for the Oswestry index after 12 weeks for participants receiving multifidus activating exercise (mean difference = -3.62, 97.5% CI: -6.89, -0.35; P= .01). There were no additional significant main or interaction effects for other treatment components or different outcome measures. The optimized SMT protocol identified in this study included SMT sessions followed by multifidus activating exercises. PERSPECTIVE: Optimizing the effects of nonpharmacological treatments such as SMT for LBP is challenging due to uncertainty regarding mechanisms and the complexity of multicomponent protocols. This factorial randomized trial examined SMT protocols provided with differing co-interventions with mechanistic and patient-centered outcomes. Patient-centered outcomes were optimized by inclusion of lumbar multifidus strengthening exercises. Crown
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; exercise; factorial design; spinal manipulative therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33309783      PMCID: PMC8190177          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.383


  65 in total

1.  Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Samuel F Dworkin; Dagmar Amtmann; Gunnar Andersson; David Borenstein; Eugene Carragee; John A Carrino; John Carrino; Roger Chou; Karon Cook; Anthony DeLitto; Christine Goertz; Partap Khalsa; John Loeser; Sean Mackey; James Panagis; James Rainville; Tor Tosteson; Dennis Turk; Michael Von Korff; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Medical Use of Long-term Extended-release Opioid Analgesics in Commercially Insured Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica C Young; Michele Jonsson Funk; Nabarun Dasgupta
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: an update of the cochrane review.

Authors:  Sidney M Rubinstein; Caroline B Terwee; Willem J J Assendelft; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Unraveling the Mechanisms of Manual Therapy: Modeling an Approach.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Rogelio A Coronado; Charles W Penza; Corey B Simon; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  The effect of unilateral muscle pain on recruitment of the lumbar multifidus during automatic contraction. An experimental pain study.

Authors:  N Dickx; B Cagnie; T Parlevliet; A Lavens; L Danneels
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-03-05

Review 6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Invasive and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Low Back Pain: a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Lazaros Andronis; Philip Kinghorn; Suyin Qiao; David G T Whitehurst; Susie Durrell; Hugh McLeod
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

7.  Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  C J Colloca; T S Keller
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Julie M Fritz; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; Eric C Parent; Norman W Gill; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 9.  Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain.

Authors:  Bruno T Saragiotto; Christopher G Maher; Tiê P Yamato; Leonardo O P Costa; Luciola C Menezes Costa; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Luciana G Macedo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-08

10.  Optimizing treatment protocols for spinal manipulative therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Jason A Sharpe; Elizabeth Lane; Doug Santillo; Tom Greene; Gregory Kawchuk
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Back and neck pain: in support of routine delivery of non-pharmacologic treatments as a way to improve individual and population health.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 7.012

2.  A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  Maliheh Hadizadeh; Greg Kawchuk; Simon French
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.