Literature DB >> 23496266

Multicultural long-term care nurses’ perceptions of factors influencing patient dignity at the end of life.

Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil1, Marguerite Stevens, Helena Kraemer.   

Abstract

The goal of this mixed-methods study was to characterize the perceptions of multicultural long-term care nurses about patient dignity at the end-of-life (EOL). The study was conducted in a large, urban, long-term care (LTC) facility. Participants were 45 long-term care nurses and 26 terminally ill nursing home residents. Nurses completed an openended interview about their perceptions of the concept of dying with dignity, and the data were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Main themes identified as promoting resident dignity at the EOL included treating them with respect, helping them prepare for the EOL, promoting shared decision-making, and providing high-quality care. The nurses’ cultural and religious backgrounds influenced their perceptions of what constitutes dignity-conserving care. Foreign-born nurses stressed the need for EOL rituals, but this was strikingly absent in the statements of U.S.-born nurses. Foreign-born Catholic nurses stated that the dying experience should not be altered using analgesics to relieve suffering or by attempts to hasten death by forgoing curative therapy or by other means. Nurses and terminally ill individuals completed the Dignity Card-sort Tool (DCT). A comparison of the DCT responses of the LTC nurses cohort with those of the terminally ill participants revealed that the nurses felt patient dignity was eroded when patient wishes were not followed and when they were treated without respect. In contrast, dying LTC residents felt that poor medical care and loss of ability to choose care options were the most important factors leading to erosion of dignity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23496266      PMCID: PMC3636182          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  8 in total

1.  Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study.

Authors:  Harvey Max Chochinov; Thomas Hack; Thomas Hassard; Linda J Kristjanson; Susan McClement; Mike Harlos
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Imported care: recruiting foreign nurses to U.S. health care facilities.

Authors:  Barbara L Brush; Julie Sochalski; Anne M Berger
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Review calls for major changes to care of older people to restore dignity.

Authors:  Adrian O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-06-18

4.  Respect, compassion and dignity: the foundations of ethical and professional caring.

Authors:  Jane Reid
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2012-07

5.  Assessment of factors influencing preservation of dignity at life's end: creation and the cross-cultural validation of the preservation of dignity card-sort tool.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Arthur M Noda; Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Creation and the empirical validation of the dignity card-sort tool to assess factors influencing erosion of dignity at life's end.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Helena Chmura Kraemer; Arthur Noda
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  "It makes you feel that somebody is out there caring": a qualitative study of intervention and control participants' perceptions of the benefits of taking part in an evaluation of dignity therapy for people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Sue Hall; Cassie Goddard; Peter W Speck; Pauline Martin; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.612

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Unmet quality indicators for metastatic cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit in the last two weeks of life.

Authors:  Jennifer A Blechman; Norman Rizk; Marguerite M Stevens; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Patient-Reported Barriers to High-Quality, End-of-Life Care: A Multiethnic, Multilingual, Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Eric Neri; Helena Kraemer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  No Easy Talk: A Mixed Methods Study of Doctor Reported Barriers to Conducting Effective End-of-Life Conversations with Diverse Patients.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Eric Neri; Helena Kraemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Patient Perspectives of Dignity, Autonomy and Control at the End of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Andrea Rodríguez-Prat; Cristina Monforte-Royo; Josep Porta-Sales; Xavier Escribano; Albert Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identifying Markers of Dignity-Conserving Care in Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Study.

Authors:  Genevieve N Thompson; Jennifer McArthur; Malcolm Doupe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dignity Violations and Barriers to Dignity Assurance for Terminally Ill Patients at the End of Life: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Eimantas Peičius; Gvidas Urbonas; W David Harrison; Aušra Urbonienė; Jolanta Kuznecovienė; Rūta Butkevičienė; Kristina Astromskė; Ramunė Kalėdienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.