Literature DB >> 23494956

Clinical experience of noninvasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA for fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13, in a general screening population.

Genevieve Fairbrother1, Shayla Johnson, Thomas J Musci, Ken Song.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) with cell-free DNA as a screening method for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in an obstetrical clinical practice setting.
METHODS: Observational study of pregnant women who underwent prenatal screening for fetal trisomy from 30 July 2012 to 1 December 2012. NIPT was offered to all patients in addition to first trimester combined screening (FTS).
RESULTS: The cohort included 289 women with mean age of 32.3 years (range: 17.8-42.0) who underwent testing at 13.0 gestational age weeks (range: 10.1-20.7). NIPT results were provided for 98.6% of patients at a mean reporting time of 9.3 calendar days. With NIPT, all patients had a risk less than 1:10 000 for trisomy 21, 18, or 13. With FTS, 4.5% of patients had screening results indicating an increased risk for trisomy 21. One patient who had an elevated trisomy 21 risk with FTS elected to have an amniocentesis, which revealed a euploid fetus.
CONCLUSIONS: NIPT has the potential to be a highly effective screening method as a standard test for risk assessment of fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in general pregnant populations.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23494956     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  17 in total

1.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

2.  Maternal age-specific risk for trisomy 21 based on the clinical performance of NIPT and empirically derived NIPT age-specific positive and negative predictive values in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamada; Akihiko Sekizawa; Yosuke Fujii; Tatsuko Hirose; Osamu Samura; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Sawai; Fumiki Hirahara; Jun Murotsuki; Yoshimasa Kamei; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 3.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 4.  Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Louise Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Patricia K Agatisa; Benjamin Nutter
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Noninvasive prenatal testing in the general obstetric population: clinical performance and counseling considerations in over 85 000 cases.

Authors:  Patricia A Taneja; Holly L Snyder; Eileen de Feo; Kristina M Kruglyak; Meredith Halks-Miller; Kirsten J Curnow; Sucheta Bhatt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Using Cell Free DNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Developments and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Peter Benn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  It's More Than a Blood Test: Patients' Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Mary Beth Mercer; Patricia K Agatisa; Marissa B Smith; Elliot Philipson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Maternal plasma fetal DNA fractions in pregnancies with low and high risks for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Irena Hudecova; Daljit Sahota; Macy M S Heung; Yongjie Jin; Wing S Lee; Tak Y Leung; Yuk Ming Dennis Lo; Rossa W K Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The first 3,000 Non-Invasive Prenatal Tests (NIPT) with the Harmony test in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  P J Willems; H Dierickx; Es Vandenakker; D Bekedam; N Segers; K Deboulle; A Vereecken
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.