Candice C Black1, Mary Jo Turk, Konstantin Dragnev, James R Rigas. 1. Department of Pathology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA. Candice.C.Black@hitchcock.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) are known to have host-immune dampening effects in many tumors and to be associated with increased tumor recurrence. Pharmacologic therapies have been developed to target these cells and hence strengthen the host's immune system. The FoxP3 gene is a marker of Tregs and can be visualized with immunohistochemistry (IHC). We investigated the presence and pattern of Tregs in non-small-cell lung tumors to determine possible therapeutic targets in lung cancer. METHODS: We selected archival samples of primary lung carcinoma and benign inflamed lung from 32 surgical resections. We created a tissue array containing duplicate cores from the N1 and N2 nodal stations from 16 of the cases along with paired benign lung and tumor. We used whole-slide analysis for the other 16 cases. We used FoxP3 IHC to visualize Tregs in all lymphoid tissue present and to assess the quantity and pattern within the tissues. RESULTS: All lymphoid tissue contains Tregs, but adenocarcinoma had significantly higher levels than both inflammatory lung controls and squamous carcinomas (p ≤ 0.008). Benign N1 lymph nodes (from patients with lung cancer) showed higher numbers of Tregs for adenocarcinoma versus squamous carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal that Tregs are present in all lung tissues examined, but with significant enrichment in adenocarcinoma. This may lead to a more permissive microenvironment for adenocarcinoma and may explain aggressive patterns of tumor spread for this histology. Lung cancer patients with adenocarcinoma histology may benefit most from Treg-targeted therapy.
BACKGROUND: Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) are known to have host-immune dampening effects in many tumors and to be associated with increased tumor recurrence. Pharmacologic therapies have been developed to target these cells and hence strengthen the host's immune system. The FoxP3 gene is a marker of Tregs and can be visualized with immunohistochemistry (IHC). We investigated the presence and pattern of Tregs in non-small-cell lung tumors to determine possible therapeutic targets in lung cancer. METHODS: We selected archival samples of primary lung carcinoma and benign inflamed lung from 32 surgical resections. We created a tissue array containing duplicate cores from the N1 and N2 nodal stations from 16 of the cases along with paired benign lung and tumor. We used whole-slide analysis for the other 16 cases. We used FoxP3 IHC to visualize Tregs in all lymphoid tissue present and to assess the quantity and pattern within the tissues. RESULTS: All lymphoid tissue contains Tregs, but adenocarcinoma had significantly higher levels than both inflammatory lung controls and squamous carcinomas (p ≤ 0.008). Benign N1 lymph nodes (from patients with lung cancer) showed higher numbers of Tregs for adenocarcinoma versus squamous carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal that Tregs are present in all lung tissues examined, but with significant enrichment in adenocarcinoma. This may lead to a more permissive microenvironment for adenocarcinoma and may explain aggressive patterns of tumor spread for this histology. Lung cancerpatients with adenocarcinoma histology may benefit most from Treg-targeted therapy.
Authors: Thomas F Gajewski; Yuru Meng; Christian Blank; Ian Brown; Aalok Kacha; Justin Kline; Helena Harlin Journal: Immunol Rev Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 12.988
Authors: Dominik Wolf; Anna M Wolf; Holger Rumpold; Heidi Fiegl; Alain G Zeimet; Elisabeth Muller-Holzner; Martina Deibl; Guenther Gastl; Eberhard Gunsilius; Christian Marth Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Igor Bondarenko; Alexander Luft; Piotr Serwatowski; Fabrice Barlesi; Raju Chacko; Martin Sebastian; Joel Neal; Haolan Lu; Jean-Marie Cuillerot; Martin Reck Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rebecca P Petersen; Michael J Campa; Justin Sperlazza; Debbi Conlon; Mary-Beth Joshi; David H Harpole; Edward F Patz Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Edward Y Woo; Heidi Yeh; Christina S Chu; Katia Schlienger; Richard G Carroll; James L Riley; Larry R Kaiser; Carl H June Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Joseph D Phillips; Lawrence M Knab; Nichole R Blatner; Leila Haghi; Malcolm M DeCamp; Shari L Meyerson; Michael J Heiferman; Jeffrey R Heiferman; Fotini Gounari; David J Bentrem; Khashayarsha Khazaie Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Patrick H Lizotte; Elena V Ivanova; Mark M Awad; Robert E Jones; Lauren Keogh; Hongye Liu; Ruben Dries; Christina Almonte; Grit S Herter-Sprie; Abigail Santos; Nora B Feeney; Cloud P Paweletz; Meghana M Kulkarni; Adam J Bass; Anil K Rustgi; Guo-Cheng Yuan; Donald W Kufe; Pasi A Jänne; Peter S Hammerman; Lynette M Sholl; F Stephen Hodi; William G Richards; Raphael Bueno; Jessie M English; Mark A Bittinger; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-09-08
Authors: Erin A Marshall; Kevin W Ng; Sonia H Y Kung; Emma M Conway; Victor D Martinez; Elizabeth C Halvorsen; David A Rowbotham; Emily A Vucic; Adam W Plumb; Daiana D Becker-Santos; Katey S S Enfield; Jennifer Y Kennett; Kevin L Bennewith; William W Lockwood; Stephen Lam; John C English; Ninan Abraham; Wan L Lam Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 27.401