Plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels (FA score) act as a promising prognostic indicator in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evidence implies that preoperative plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin are associated with cancer prognosis. We aimed to explore the prognostic values of the score based on plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels (FA score) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare that with prognostic nutritional index (PNI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 182 patients pathologically diagnosed with NSCLC were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate analysis were used in the prognostic analyses.
RESULTS: High FA score was related to smoking (P=0.005), poor differential grade (P=0.002), and advanced T stage (P<0.001) and tumor, node, and metastases stage (P=0.011). Low PNI showed association with advanced T stage (P=0.030). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that high FA score and low PNI were associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS; for the FA score, P<0.001; for PNI, P=0.001) and overall survival (OS; for the FA score, P<0.001; for PNI, P=0.013), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that FA score was an independent predictor for PFS (P=0.003) and OS (P=0.001) in NSCLC patients.
CONCLUSION: The FA score could act as a more promising prognostic predictor than PNI in NSCLC patients who underwent pneumonectomy.

Introduction

In 2012, 1.8 million newly diagnosed lung cancer patients were estimated to be affected worldwide which accounted for ~13% of all types of cancer diagnoses. And, lung cancer ranked as the leading cause of cancer death among males in 2012.1 Although much progress in multimodal therapy has emerged, surgical resection continues to play a vital role in the treatment of lung cancer, especially the relatively early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients still remains only ~17.4% when various therapies are adopted.2,3 Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective biomarkers to identify patients who may have poor clinical outcomes after surgical treatment.

Some indicators, including hemostatic factors, nutritional status, and immunological responses, could reflect outcomes of patients with tumors.4–6 Fibrinogen, produced in the liver in response to cytokine stimulation, may reflect tumor development and inflammatory level.7–9 Several studies confirmed the relationship between high serum fibrinogen levels and poor prognosis in NSCLC patients.10–12 Albumin, which reflects nutritional status, is also reported to have a strong association with outcomes of NSCLC patients.13,14 Therefore, the combination of fibrinogen and albumin may serve as a more effective scoring system to predict prognosis of NSCLC patients following pneumonectomy. Satoru Matsuda et al reported that plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels (FA score) showed significant association with survival in esophageal cancer patients.15

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated by albumin and lymphocytes count, has been assessed as a prognostic indicator in tumors, such as esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.6,16,17 It is broadly demonstrated that high preoperative PNI is related to normal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, small tumor size, well differential grade, pathological stage I, and long survival time in NSCLC patients.18–21 However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated FA score in NSCLC patients.

Thus, we conducted a retrospective study to mainly discuss correlations of preoperative FA score with clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in NSCLC patients. Then, we compared the values of FA score and PNI in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Materials and methods

Patients

Between January 2009 and December 2010, 182 patients with pathologically diagnosed NSCLC who underwent pneumonectomy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were retrospectively reviewed in our cohort. Patients were excluded from our research if they: 1) underwent neoadjuvant therapy; 2) had ≥2 primary tumors; 3) had coagulation disorders or metabolic diseases before; 4) were lost to follow-up. All clinicopathological features were obtained from the patients’ records. Pathological stages of patients were based on the tumor, node, and metastases (TNM) classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (seventh edition, 2010).43 Patients’ laboratory and hematological data were tested routinely within 1 week prior to surgery. All clinical investigations in our study were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was ratified by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients in this study.

Follow-up

Patients were followed up every 3–4 months in the first 2 years after surgery and every 6 months thereafter until they were lost or dead. The last date of follow-up was November 2015. Follow-up of patients included blood tests, urine tests, computed tomography, and physical examination. PFS and OS at the end of our follow-up were adopted as the endpoints of this study. PFS (in months) was the time interval during which no local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred in patients. OS (in months) was calculated as the time interval from the date of completion of surgery to the date of death or last follow-up.

FA score and PNI evaluation

From receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, cutoff values of fibrinogen and albumin were determined. Then, fibrinogen and albumin acted as categorical variables in this study. Patients with both elevated fibrinogen and decreased albumin were assigned a score of 2, patients with either of the two abnormities were assigned a score of 1, while those with neither of the two abnormities were assigned a score of 0. PNI was obtained by albumin (g/L) +5× total lymphocyte count (109/L).

Statistical analysis

Serum fibrinogen, serum albumin, and lymphocyte count were calculated as mean and standard deviation. The three indicators were analyzed across differential grade, T stage, N stage, and TNM classification. An unpaired t-test and one-way analysis of variance were adopted to analyze continuous variables of different subgroups. Relationships between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-square test. ROC analysis was performed to determine possible cutoff values of the continuous serum fibrinogen, albumin, and PNI. To confirm the accuracy of the FA score and PNI for predicting survival outcomes, ROC curves were also used during the analyses. In the analyses of PFS and OS, Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were used. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was adopted in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis could be included into the multivariable analysis. A two-sided P-value was used in this study and a value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 20.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) program was used for statistical analyses.

Results

Baseline clinicopathological characteristics of patients

The baseline characteristics of 182 patients are shown in Table 1. Fifty five (30.2%) female patients and 127 (69.8%) male patients were included. The age of patients at diagnosis ranged from 29 to 85 years and the median was 62 years. Seventy two (39.6%) patients had the histologic type of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) while 75 (41.2%) patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (ADC). Other histologic types occurred in 35 (19.2%) patients, including 12 cases of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, 12 cases of adenosquamous carcinoma, seven cases of large cell carcinoma, and four cases of papillary ADC. Ninety eight (53.8%) patients underwent pneumonectomy alone, 14 (7.7%) patients received postoperative radiotherapy, 49 (26.9%) received postoperative chemotherapy, and 21 (11.6%) received postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Table 1

Clinical and histopathological characteristics of 182 non-small cell lung cancer patients

Characteristic	Patients, n (%)
Sex
emale/male	55 (30.2)/127 (69.8)
Age (years)
Mean ± SD	60.85±10.08
Median (range)	62 (29–85)
Smoking
Yes	83 (45.6)
No	99 (54.4)
Histologic type
SCC	72 (39.6)
ADC	75 (41.2)
Others	35 (19.2)
Differential grade
Poor	21 (11.5)
Middle	95 (52.2)
Well	66 (36.3)
T stage
T1	72 (39.5)
T2	82 (45.1)
T3	28 (15.4)
N stage
N0	116 (63.7)
N1–3	66 (36.3)
TNM stage
I	94 (51.6)
II	55 (30.2)
III	33 (18.2)
Adjuvant therapy
Yes	84 (46.2)
No	98 (53.8)
Lymphocyte (109/L)
Mean ± SD	1.86±0.61
Median (range)	1.81 (0.69–4.39)
Albumin (g/L)
Mean ± SD	42.88±4.82
Median (range)	42.90 (25.10–53.5)
Fibrinogen (g/L)
Mean ± SD	3.82±1.20
Median (range)	3.59 (1.92–8.73)
PNI
Mean ± SD	52.18±5.69
Median (range)	52.83 (34.65–65.05)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; TNM, tumor, node, and metastases.

Associations of preoperative lymphocyte count, serum albumin, fibrinogen, FA score, and PNI with clinicopathological characteristics

The associations of serum albumin, fibrinogen, and lymphocyte count with clinical status are shown in Table 2. Lymphocyte count (for N stage, P=0.029; for TNM stage, P=0.036) decreased, and fibrinogen level (for N stage, P=0.003; for TNM stage, P<0.001) increased with the advancement of N stage and TNM stage. Albumin (for the differential grade, P=0.004; for T stage, P=0.012) and fibrinogen (P<0.001) were both associated with differential grade and T stage. These three indices showed statistical relevance with TNM stage, especially fibrinogen. Fibrinogen was the only indicator associated with all of differential grade, T stage, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage.

Table 2

Clinical status and albumin, fibrinogen, and lymphocyte count in non-small cell lung cancer

Characteristics	Albumin (g/L)		Fibrinogen (g/L)		Lymphocyte (109/L)
	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Differential grade
Poor	39.63	4.14	5.04	1.68	1.68	0.55
Middle	43.43	4.61	3.52	1.03	1.92	0.68
Well	43.11	4.96	3.88	0.79	1.84	0.49
P-value	0.004*		<0.001*		0.252
T stage
T1	43.67	4.56	3.29	0.75	1.84	0.63
T2	42.99	4.45	3.93	1.03	1.94	0.63
T3	40.51	5.81	4.90	1.74	1.66	0.44
P-value	0.012*		<0.001*		0.107
N stage
N0	43.15	4.96	3.62	1.07	1.93	0.64
N1–3	42.39	4.56	4.18	1.34	1.73	0.52
P-value	0.314		0.003*		0.029*
TNM stage
I	43.43	4.60	3.48	0.95	1.95	0.67
II	43.07	5.18	3.95	1.04	1.83	0.50
III	40.96	4.42	4.60	1.65	1.64	0.52
P-value	0.036*		<0.001*		0.036*

Note:

Statistically significant values, P<0.05.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TNM, tumor, node, and metastases.

With ROC analysis, we obtained the cutoff value of 39.3 g/L for serum albumin, 3.62 g/L for fibrinogen, and 46.6 for PNI. Eighty four (46.2%) patients were distributed to the group of score 0, 67 (36.8%) to the group of score 1, and others were in the group of score 2. For PNI, 33 (18.1%) patients were assigned to the lower group (<46.6), while 149 (81.9%) patients were included in the higher group (≥46.6).

The relationships of FA score and PNI with clinicopathological characteristics are shown in Table 3. Significant differences occurred for smoking (P=0.005), differential grade (P=0.002), T stage (P<0.001), and TNM stage (P=0.011) according to FA score. High FA score was related to poor differential grade, as well as advanced T and TNM stage. High PNI was related to early T stage of the tumor (P=0.030), but no associations were found between PNI and other characteristics (all P>0.05).

Table 3

Characteristics of 182 non-small cell lung cancer patients grouped by FA score and PNI

Characteristics	FA score			P-value	PNI		P-value
	Score 0(N=84)	Score 1(N=67)	Score 2(N=31)		<46.6(N=33)	≥46.6(N=149)
Sex				0.084			0.409
Female	32	17	6		8	47
Male	52	50	25		25	102
Age (years)				0.203			0.487
<60	41	24	11		12	64
≥60	43	43	20		21	85
Smoking				0.005*			0.254
Yes	29	33	21		18	65
No	55	34	10		15	84
Histologic type				0.087			0.454
SCC	25	34	13		13	59
ADC	38	25	12		16	59
Others	21	8	6		4	31
Differential grade				0.002*			0.156
Poor	4	7	10		11	55
Middle	48	26	11		15	80
Well	32	24	10		7	14
T stage				<0.001*			0.030*
T1	45	21	6		10	62
T2	35	33	14		13	69
T3	4	13	11		10	18
N stage				0.215			0.107
N0	59	40	17		17	99
N1–3	25	27	14		16	50
TNM stage				0.011*			0.107
I	50	32	12		13	81
II	25	23	7		10	45
III	9	12	12		10	23
Adjuvant therapy				0.837			0.103
Yes	44	38	16		22	76
No	40	29	15		11	73

Note:

Statistically significant values, P<0.05.

Abbreviations: FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; TNM, tumor, node, and metastases.

Predictive values of FA score and PNI for patients’ survival

At the end of follow-up, 86 (47.3%) patients died. The median PFS was 47.0 months, ranging from 1.0 to 81.0 months. The median OS was 59.5 months, ranging from 2.3 to 81.0 months. Significant differences occurred for PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001) according to FA score (Figure 1). PFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.013) of patients between low and high PNI groups also exhibited statistical difference. In conclusion, a high FA score, as well as low PNI, was associated with the short survival time of patients with NSCLC.

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier analysis for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) of non-small cell lung cancer patients based on (a) preoperative FA score and (b) PNI at the end of follow-up.

Abbreviations: PNI, prognostic nutritional index; Cum, cumulative; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score.

Univariate and multivariate survival analyses

Table 4 shows the results of univariate analysis of PFS and OS. The following factors were related to shorter PFS and OS: poorer differential grade, advanced T stage, N stage, and TNM stage, as well as higher FA score, and lower PNI (all P<0.05). Then, we performed multivariate survival analysis by Cox model (Table 5). Results indicated that FA score (score 2, P<0.001, hazard ratio [HR] =2.868, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.524–5.395) and TNM stage (for TNM II, P=0.024, HR =6.032, 95% CI, 1.269–28.674; for TNM III, P=0.001, HR =6.486, 95% CI, 2.064–20.382) were independent factors for OS. As for PFS, FA (score 2, P=0.003, HR =2.561, 95% CI, 1.390–4.720) was an independent indicator in patients with NSCLC.

Table 4

Univariate analysis of survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated by surgery

Characteristic	PFS			OS
	P-value	HR	95% CI	P-value	HR	95% CI
Female	0.564	0.876	0.558–1.374	0.439	0.828	0.514–1.335
Age <60 (years)	0.185	1.324	0.874–2.007	0.161	1.370	0.882–2.128
Smoking	0.966	1.009	0.676–1.507	0.817	1.051	0.688–1.605
Histological type
SCC		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
ADC	0.051	1.565	0.998–2.455	0.061	1.576	0.979–2.536
Others	0.548	1.192	0.671–2.118	0.647	1.153	0.626–2.124
Differential grade
Poor		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
Middle	0.009*	0.458	0.255–0.822	0.002*	0.396	0.217–0.720
Well	0.067	0.568	0.310–1.041	0.033*	0.512	0.277–0.946
T stage
T1		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
T2	0.116	1.447	0.913–2.291	0.032	1.739	1.048–2.885
T3	<0.001*	2.594	1.485–4.532	<0.001*	3.561	1.986–6.385
N stage: N0/N1–3	0.027*	1.584	1.052–2.383	0.024*	1.640	1.069–2.518
TNM stage
I		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
II	0.337	1.258	0.788–2.007	0.112	1.496	0.911–2.456
III	0.003*	2.167	1.297–3.620	<0.001*	2.605	1.527–4.445
Treatment regimens: surgery alone	0.482	0.865	0.578–1.295	0.177	0.743	0.482–1.144
FA score
0		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
1	0.143	1.147	0.889–2.257	0.046*	1.664	1.009–2.745
2	<0.001*	3.119	1.861–5.229	<0.001*	3.505	2.024–6.069
PNI ≥46.6	0.001*	0.475	0.300–0.751	0.016*	0.544	0.332–0.891

Note:

Statistically significant values, P<0.05.

Abbreviations: PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., reference; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; TNM, tumor, node, and metastases.

Table 5

Multivariate analysis of survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated by surgery

Characteristic	PFS			OS
	P-value	HR	95% CI	P-value	HR	95% CI
Differential grade
Poor		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
Middle	0.467	1.650	0.428–6.371	0.055	3.344	0.976–11.462
Well	0.550	1.368	0.489–3.824	0.730	0.818	0.262–2.558
TNM stage
I		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
II	0.580	1.503	0.355–6.355	0.024*	6.032	1.269–28.674
III	0.128	2.654	0.755–9.324	0.001*	6.486	2.064–20.382
FA score
0		1.000	Ref.		1.000	Ref.
1	0.232	1.353	0.824–2.221	0.185	1.427	0.844–2.415
2	0.003*	2.561	1.390–4.720	0.001*	2.868	1.524–5.395
PNI ≥46.6	0.164	0.694	0.415–1.160	0.476	0.820	0.476–1.415

Note:

Statistically significant values, P<0.05.

Abbreviations: PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., reference; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; TNM, tumor, node, and metastases.

Subgroup analysis by histological types of NSCLC

Considering that clinical outcomes of patients may vary as the histological type changes, our patients were classified into two groups (SCC and ADC groups, and the other types were not analyzed). In the analysis of SCC patients (Figure 2), high FA score was significantly associated with poor PFS (P=0.022) and OS (P=0.004). Patients with high PNI exhibited superior PFS (P=0.003) and OS (P=0.007). For patients with ADC, PFS (P=0.006) and OS (P=0.016) both dropped significantly when the FA score was 2. However, PNI showed no statistical relationship with PFS (P=0.062) and OS (P=0.466) (Figure 3).

Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier analysis for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) in squamous cell carcinoma patients according to (a) preoperative FA score and (b) PNI.

Abbreviations: PNI, prognostic nutritional index; Cum survival, cumulative survival; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score.

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier analysis for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) in adenocarcinoma patients according to (a) preoperative FA score and (b) PNI.

Abbreviations: PNI, prognostic nutritional index; Cum survival, cumulative survival; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score.

Predictive values of FA score and PNI for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS

Survival analyses of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were included in this study (Figure 4). FA score was associated statistically with the 1-year (P=0.047), 3-year (P=0.001), and 5-year (P<0.001) OS. Patients with higher PNI showed superior outcomes for 3-year (P=0.004) and 5-year (P=0.009) OS, while no association was found between PNI and 1-year (P=0.069) OS.

Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier analysis for 1-year (A), 3-year (B), and 5-year (C) overall survival of 182 non-small cell lung cancer patients according to (a) preoperative FA score and (b) PNI.

Abbreviations: PNI, prognostic nutritional index; Cum survival, cumulative survival; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score.

ROC curves of FA score and PNI for predicting survival outcomes

ROC curve analyses of FA score and PNI were performed for PFS and OS prediction (Figure 5). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.636 for FA score (P=0.001, 95% CI, 0.556–0.717) and 0.584 for PNI (P=0.051, 95% CI, 0.501–0.666) in the analysis on PFS. For OS, the AUC was 0.662 for FA score (P<0.001, 95% CI, 0.583–0.742) and 0.560 for PNI (P=0.166, 95% CI, 0.476–0.644).

Figure 5

ROC curve analysis of FA score and PNI for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) prediction.

Abbreviations: PNI, prognostic nutritional index; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; FA score, plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels score.

Discussion

Recently, several prognostic factors have been reported in NSCLC patients, including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, serum albumin, fibrinogen, and others.12,14,18,21,22 In the present study, the clinical values of preoperative FA score and PNI were investigated in patients with resectable NSCLC. High FA score was related to smoking status, poor differential grade, and advanced T stage and TNM stage. FA score acted as an independent predictive factor for PFS and OS in patients with NSCLC. Low PNI was also associated with advanced T stage. PNI showed a statistical relationship with both PFS and OS, but was not an independent indicator according to the multivariate analysis. In addition, FA score and PNI exhibited different values according to different histological types and different survival times. These results reinforced that FA score and PNI could provide abundant information about the clinical prognosis of NSCLC patients, and FA score might be a more promising prognostic indicator, compared to PNI.

The roles of malnutrition and inflammation in regulating carcinogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis have become the hot spot in cancer research.1,5,23 Low serum albumin could represent the compromised nutritional status of the host, as well as the response of systemic inflammation.24 Studies demonstrated that hypoalbuminemia was associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival in various malignancies.24–26 Tanriverdi et al reported that low serum albumin could predict poor prognosis in NSCLC patients, and reflects reduced response rate to first-line therapy.14 Studies found the association between hypoalbuminemia and poor clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC.27,28 In our analysis, low preoperative albumin level showed a statistical relation with poor differential grade and advanced tumor stage, which was consistent with other studies.

Activated coagulation and fibrinolysis are commonly related to tumor invasion and metastasis. Studies proved that elevated concentration of platelet count, D-dimer, and antithrombin III content had a strong association with a worse prognosis in NSCLC patients.29–31 Recent studies revealed that serum fibrinogen showed a correlation with prognosis in different cancers.32,33 Elevated fibrinogen level was found to be associated with poor prognosis acting as a predictive biomarker in NSCLC patients.11,12 High fibrinogen had a relationship with poor differential grade, and advanced T stage, N stage, and TNM stage. It is reasonable to adopt the FA score as a prognostic scoring system in NSCLC patients. As a combined indicator, FA score could represent nutritional status, inflammation, and the coagulation system of a patient.

FA score was observed to have an association with tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative survival in esophageal cancer patients.15 In our cohort, the FA score showed a statistical relation with smoking status, differential grade, T stage, and TNM stage. FA score 2 represented aggressive tumor phenotypes and unfavorable prognosis, relative to FA score 0. Considering the association of FA score and smoking status in this study, our subgroup analysis found that FA score was related to survival both in smokers (P=0.011) and in nonsmokers (P<0.001). Furthermore, FA score was associated with PFS and OS in both SCC and ADC according to our analysis. Patients with neoadjuvant treatments were excluded considering the influence of preoperative treatment on clinical outcomes, but 84 patients with postoperative treatment were still included in the analysis. Then, we assessed the association of postoperative treatment and PFS (P=0.482) and OS (P=0.177), but no positive results were found. Among 98 patients without postoperative therapy, FA score was still statistically related to PFS and OS (both P=0.001). Patients with score 0 had a median OS of 67.0 months, while it was 27.0 months when patients were in the score 2 group. The mortality of patients according to a score of 0, 1, and 2 was 33.3%, 50.7%, and 77.4% (P<0.001), respectively.

Low albumin commonly reflects malnutrition, which could impair anatomic barriers, immunity, and other defense mechanisms.34 Fibrinogen is involved in the connection between matrix and tumor cells. It could act as a scaffold binding with growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2,35,36 which promotes adhesion, proliferation, and migration of tumor cells. Moreover, fibrinogen deposition facilitates the formation of thrombin by enhancing the interaction of tumor cells and platelets, which protects tumor cells from natural killers.37 Palumbo et al revealed that the formation of pulmonary metastases could be inhibited when circulating fibrinogen was absent in mice models.38 The results can help explain our findings of FA score in NSCLC patients.

PNI was reported to exhibit an association with tumor prognosis. Studies have confirmed that NSCLC patients with low PNI experienced poor clinical outcomes, but the optimal cutoff value was controversial.18,19,21 Besides albumin, the predictive value of PNI stems from lymphocyte partially. Lymphocytes play an important role in inducing cytotoxic immune responses and suppressing tumor cell proliferation and invasion.39,40 However, another study observed that elevated CD4+ T lymphocyte infiltration into tumor was correlated with poor outcome in prostate cancer patients.41 In our analysis, patients with low lymphocyte count tended to develop lymph node metastasis and demonstrated advanced TNM stage. We set the cutoff value of PNI as 46.6, and found that patients with PNI <46.6 had advanced T stage. PFS and OS would be longer if patients had a high PNI. We found that PFS and OS had no significant difference between two groups of PNI in patients with ADC, which might partially be explained by the different biological features between SCC and ADC. As Black et al elaborated, an enrichment of regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) existed in lung ADC tissues, and was associated with poor outcomes.42 This may diminish prognostic values of PNI in patients with ADC.

In the multivariate analysis, FA score was an independent predictive factor for PFS and OS while PNI was not. Our analysis of the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS revealed that PNI was not suitable for predicting short-term survival in NSCLC patients. ROC curves of FA score showed that the AUC was 0.636 (P=0.001) for PFS and 0.662 (P<0.001) for OS, which were superior to PNI. These suggest that the FA score could provide more prognostic information, being a more accurate predictor than PNI.

This research is limited to a retrospective single-center cohort, and a small sample was enrolled. We only conducted a subgroup analysis including SCC and ADC, and other pathological types were excluded because of the small sample size. In addition, the cutoff levels were calculated by ROC curves, and it was unclear whether other cutoff values were more valuable. Considering this, our study confirmed that FA score was a potential independent prognostic predictor in NSCLC patients undergoing surgical treatment. Multicentric prospective studies with large samples need to be carried out in the future.

Conclusion

In general, the nutrition and coagulation-based FA score might be a more promising prognostic predictor than PNI in NSCLC patients who undergo surgical therapy. Measurements of fibrinogen and albumin were carried out at low cost, were less traumatic, and were easily accessible in clinical practice. Thus, the FA score could serve as a biomarker for prognosis in NSCLC patients with pneumonectomy. This systemic score can facilitate doctors’ selection of patients who may need to accept more adjuvant therapies and more frequent follow-up, which are beneficial for personalized treatment in NSCLC.