Operative field temperature during transnasal endoscopic cranial base procedures.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the safety of endoscopic skull base exploration are very scarce. With this method, fragile vital structures (cranial nerves, the optic complex, brainstem, hypothalamus or cerebral ventricles) are exposed to direct illumination within a closed space. Also, high-speed drills, cauterization and ultrasonic aspiration deliver a significant load of thermal energy. The aim of this study was to record the temperature close to the structures of the skull base and in the intradural space during the procedures performed using extended endoscopic transnasal approaches.
METHODS: The temperature of the skull base was continuously recorded during six transnasal endoscopic procedures. Implantable copper-constantan thermocouples were inserted: one into the esophagus and another through the nostril to reach the operative field at the skull base.
RESULTS: At the beginning of the procedure, the temperature of the operative field was on average 36.8 °C ± 0.80 °C, i.e. only 1 °C higher than the esophageal temperature. Then it grew continuously during the whole procedure, to eventually reach a level of 42-43 °C at the final stage, whereas the esophageal temperature remained stable. Occasionally, the temperature increased up to 45 °C during cauterization and ultrasonic aspiration, and even up to 62 °C during high-speed drilling.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic skull base surgery is associated with an incessant increase of the temperature of the intraoperative field. The temperature can peak suddenly to levels which can potentially harm neural structures and influence the rate of postoperative complications.

Introduction

Using extended transnasal approaches, today the surgeon can explore not only the entire skull base, but also penetrate the cranial cavity, and expose vital and fragile structures like the cranial nerves, the optic complex, brainstem, hypothalamus or cerebral ventricles [1-4]. With the diffusion of these techniques and new endoscopic tools, endoscopic procedures are becoming more and more complex and much longer lasting. A lot of bone drilling is necessary as well as frequent cauterization, and many surgical steps are performed under high magnification. All this involves close range illumination of the structures with a strong beam of light. These maneuvers deliver a significant load of thermal energy that (in contrast to “open” brain surgery) cannot dissipate freely to the environment, as the endoscopic surgery is carried out within the confines of surgically enlarged nasal cavity, while several instruments are introduced through the nostrils, “occluding” them.

Is well known that temperature increases above 42 °C can seriously harm the brain [5, 6], but on the other hand it is somewhat surprising that only very scarce and indirect data exist as to thermal effects on the brain during endoscopic transnasal surgery [7, 8]. Kassam et al. have recently reviewed the complications of 800 endoscopic skull base surgeries, and have not mentioned high temperature as a possible source of neural deficits, visual loss and infections which are the most frequent adverse effects of this surgery [1].

In our neurosurgical center, extended transnasal approaches have been performed since 2007 [4, 9], and earlier we studied extensively brain temperature during and after brain surgery [10, 11]. We decided to position a miniature implantable thermoprobe in close contact with the exposed skull base and cerebral structures in order to measure the temperature during endoscopic transnasal procedures performed via extended approaches.

Methods and materials

With institutional approval and written informed consent, we measured temperature in the depth of the nasal cavity in six patients who were undergoing endoscopic transnasal surgery for cranial base pathologies. There were two men and four women between the ages of 26 and 58 years. All were operated on under general anesthesia with controlled mild arterial hypotension. Hopkins telescopes II (18 cm, ϕ 4 mm, 0° and 45°), connected to a standard xenon light source (Xenon Nova 175) were used in all instances. Bi-nostril approach and four-hand technique were used in all procedures with no mechanical endoscope holder. Constant suction was maintained during such maneuvers as high-speed drilling of the bone, cauterization and application of ultrasonic aspiration (CUSA). The operative field was poured with lukewarm saline only after each of the above maneuvers and rather sparingly, just to keep the vision clear (see comment in the discussion section). All endoscopic equipment was provided by Karl Storz Endoscope, Germany. The procedures consisted of removal of following pathologies: cholesterol granuloma of the pyramid apex; meningioma of the planum sphenoidale with a suprasellar extension; basal frontal lobe teratoma operated using transplanum approach; giant pituitary adenoma with extension into the third ventricle; sarcoma infiltrating the sphenoid and cavernous sinuses and the upper clivus, and retrochiasmatic craniopharyngioma. No patient had fever nor other detected pathologies.

Temperature measurement

Teflon coated implantable copper-constantan type T thermocouples (Physitemp, USA) were used for all temperature measurements. Intranasal temperature was measured with a 0.2 mm probe introduced through the right nostril after anterior sphenoidectomy had been performed. The thermocouple was placed as close to the operated structures as possible, and constantly replaced to be illuminated and visible on the screen. When intracranial structures were exposed, the thermocouple was advanced and placed directly on/within them. In this way, the temperature close to the optic complex and within the third ventricle could eventually be recorded when these structures were manipulated under high magnification. At these moments, the tip of light-delivering telescope was fixed nearby for relatively long time. During some manipulations, e.g. during harvesting of pedicled mucosal septal flap, the thermocouple had to be withdrawn and then reintroduced. It must be mentioned that the temperature was recorded directly onto computer, whereas the surgeon routinely worked being unaware of current temperature level.

Esophageal temperature (Tes) was recorded in all patients as a reference temperature, representing the core body temperature. This was measured with a 1.2 mm flexible thermocouple introduced through the mouth and placed 32–36 cm below the lips [12] Temperature values were read by a TM-12 thermometer (Physitemp, USA) with an accuracy of 0.1 °C, and a resolution 0.01 °C, sampled every 2 s with a computer- operated data acquisition system and logged on to a disc. The duration of continuous temperature recordings ranged from 69 min to 143 min (mean 91 min).

Results

At the beginning of the temperature recording, a mean value of the trunk core temperature (represented by Tes) was 36.0 °C ± 0.45 °C, whilst the mean value of the intranasal temperature close to the operative field (Tof) was 36.8 °C ± 0.80 °C; the values averaged for all patients. At the completion of the main phase of the operation (tumor removal), the mean trunk core temperature did not increase and was on average 36.0 ± 0.48 °C. This was in contrast with the operative field temperature, which instead showed a constant increment in all cases, reaching an average value of 41.0 ± 1.83 °C at the final stage of the procedure. Therefore, the difference between the temperature of the operative field and the trunk core temperature increased from an initial value of 0.81 ± 0.84 °C to 5.02 ± 2.01 °C. It is of note that in two cases we observed a consistently high intranasal temperature reaching up to 43 °C and occasionally higher. Moreover, apart from this general trend, momentary excursions of the temperature up to even 62.5 °C were noted during bone drilling or during the application of ultrasonic aspiration (CUSA).

Figure 1 shows an example of temperature recording in a 55-year-old male who was operated on because of a suprasellar adenoma. At the beginning of the procedure, the temperature of the operative field oscillated around Tes, but rapidly increased up to 45 °C during sphenoid bone drilling with a high-speed diamond burr (asterixes). Sterile lukewarm saline solution was used to irrigate the operative field after each session of bone drilling and this maneuver brought the temperature down to the initial level. We noted that the highest temperature was reached after periods of 8 s of bone drilling. Continuous drilling for 12 s resulted in a sudden unusually high temperature peak of 62 °C (double asterix). Very gentle drilling of the planum sphenoidale was associated with an increase in temperature up to 43 °C within 3 min (arrow).

Fig. 1

Temperature of the operating field (Tof) and trunk core temperature (represented by esophageal temperature—Tes) during endoscopic removal of suprasellar adenoma. Asterix marks temperature peaks of 43–45 °C associated with each 8 s session of bone drilling within sphenoid sinus. Double asterix marks temperature peak of 60 °C associated with 12 s of bone drilling and arrow marks a 3 min period of intermitted but gentle drilling of planum sphenoidale. During intradural phase of procedure (shadowed part of graph), thermoprobe advanced intrasellary indicated local temperature of 43 °C. Dashed line indicates increasing trend of temperature during the entire period of measurement

In the second phase of the operation (marked on the graph with a shadow), both the thermocouple and the optic were advanced behind the dura and the content of the tumor was evacuated with a ring curette under high magnification and with endoscope fixed manually in a close proximity to the operated intradural structures. During this phase of the surgery, the temperature in the illuminated intradural structures remained 42–43 °C with an increasing trend. During this step, the temperature decreased during the flushing/aspiration of the operative field and/or due to inadvertent temporal displacement of the thermocouple out of the intradural space.

The temperature trend was obtained by approximation of the series with distance-weighted least square smoothing technique (DWLS) and tension parameter set at 0. In order to avoid inclusion of the temperature when the probe was out, the trend was calculated only from the values of temperature exceeding the core trunk temperature. The obtained line of trend demonstrates a continuous increment of the temperature within the operative field during the whole procedure, with an average rate of growth of 0.08 °C/min, which corresponds to a rate of ∼5 °C per hour.

Figure 2 shows the changes of the intranasal temperature in a patient operated for a sarcoma infiltrating the sphenoid and cavernous sinus and the clivus. The shadowed part of the plot indicates tumor debulking with CUSA. Even during the initial phase of preparation (in which no CUSA and no drilling were used), the operating field temperature increased gradually from 37.5 °C (i.e. a level corresponding to the deep trunk temperature) to values exceeding 40 °C. When the CUSA was used continuously for 10 min during the removal of the intraclival part of the tumor, a steady increase of the local temperature up to the value of 45 °C was observed (arrow), in spite of parallel use of surgical aspiration. During piecemeal removal of the tumor, achieved with intermittent use of the CUSA (see last 20 min on the graph), the thermocouple was exposed to direct illumination from a short distance and temperature increased up to 50 °C. The line of trend shows a continuous increment up and above 43 °C, with an estimated average rate of increment of 3.6 °C/h (0.06 °C/min).

Fig. 2

Temperature of the operating field (Tof) and trunk core temperature (Tes) during endoscopic removal of sarcoma infiltrating the sphenoid and cavernous sinuses and the clivus. Dashed line: an increasing trend of operative field temperature during procedure. Continuous use of ultrasonic aspiration for 10 min (shadow) is associated with temperature increase up to 45 °C. Intermittent use of CUSA under direct illumination of the thermocouple from close distance increases local temperature up to 50 °C (last 20 min of procedure)

Short samples of temperature records in three different patients are aggregated in Fig. 3, in order to depict time dynamics of temperature excursions during certain surgical maneuvers. Figure 3a shows temperature course during bone drilling over the paraclival segment of the carotid artery in a patient with petrous apex cholesterol granuloma. The thermocouple was placed in close vicinity to the site of drilling. Each period of bone drilling was associated with an immediate rise of the temperature from the baseline value (36 °C) up to 40–44 °C, and in some instances even up to 50–51 °C.

Fig. 3

Short samples of temperature records in three different patients. a temperature of the operative field in patient with petrous apex cholesterol granuloma. There was an immediate rise of temperature from baseline value of 36 °C up to 50–51 °C during bone drilling. b thermoprobe inserted epidurally through small perforation in the sellar floor in patients with macroadenoma. Intrasellar temperature rises up to 41 and 45 °C during thinning of the sellar floor with a high-speed drill (asterix). c cauterization of vascularized tumor within the sphenoid sinus (2.5 min, shadow area). Temperature of the operative field increases up to 41.5 °C, but its return to initial level takes 5 min

Figure 3b shows the temperature during bone drilling in a patient with a macroadenoma. In this patient, the thermocouple was introduced through a small perforation of the sella behind the bone of the sellar floor, epidurally. The standard approach aims to drill the sellar floor, thinning it in an “egg shell” manner to enable its removal with a rongeur. Within few seconds, this maneuver yielded an intrasellar increase of temperature up to 41 and 45 °C during a second attempt.

Figure 3c demonstrates a section of the temperature record in the same patient as in Fig. 2. Extended time scale demonstrates the temperature course during a 3 min. session of intensive, though intermittent cauterization of a highly vascularized tumor within the sphenoid sinus (shadow area). During this phase, the temperature increased from 35.5 °C to almost 42 °C and the return to the initial level took as long as 5 min.

Discussion

Thanks to unrelenting efforts of several advanced teams, it has been demonstrated that virtually the entire ventral cranial base is accessible with endoscopic technique, and many sophisticated procedures have became feasible in the past decade [1–3, 8, 9]. Nevertheless, it is mandatory that feasibility, granted by continuous evolution of the technical instruments, is coupled with safety and efficiency, whilst at the same time the technique itself has to be standardized. Transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery is seldom described as a “minimally invasive” technique, but it is not, and several aspects of its safety have yet to be outlined and be studied. Thermal effect on the brain and the surrounding structures is one of them, but to date has not been explored in large series nor highlighted as potentially harmful.

Our study, although on a small series of patients, demonstrates that during prolonged transnasal endoscopic approaches to the skull base the temperature within the operative field increases steadily to eventually reach and exceed in some patients 42 °C. This heating effect is expected to happen in virtually all patients in spite of suctioning and flushing of the operative field with lukewarm saline solution. Furthermore, high-speed drilling of the bone is associated with transient increments of the local temperature up to 50–60 °C, whereas during a 10 min long use of the CUSA, temperature can increase up to 45 °C. These changes in the operative field temperature were all observed in patients whose core trunk temperature remained at a mildly hypothermic level of 35–36 °C, commonly seen during general anesthesia [13].

Such high temperature of the operative field within the skull base is likely to jeopardize cerebral structures, especially during the intracranial phase of operation. It is well known that human brain, even under normal conditions, is exceptionally susceptible for temperature. Rectal temperature of 41.9 °C has been recorded at the end of marathon run and of 42.5 °C in collapsed runners [5, 6]. Most authors agree that adverse metabolic effects appear in the brain at the temperature of 40.5–41 °C and brain temperature 41.5–42 °C is potentially lethal [5]. Therefore, the “safe zone” for temperature increase of the brain is very narrow. It must also be remembered that cerebral structures of interest can be compressed by a mass lesion with resultant local ischemia, and it is well known that ischemic brain is particularly sensitive for small (1–3 °C) increases in temperature [14].

It is also worth of remembering that the nasal cavity, when normally ventilated, is a potent heat sink for the brain, thanks to venous corridors that connect these two cranial compartments and can transfer cooled blood from the nasal mucosa to the basal aspects of the brain [15, 16]. In particular, it has been shown that in intubated mildly hyperthermic patients the temperature of basal aspect of the brain is the highest core body temperature, and it falls even below the trunk core temperature immediately after extubation and reintroduction of the normal ventilation through the nose [11]. Obviously, during the endonasal endoscopic procedures the nasal cavity is by-passed by an endotracheal tube and cannot be cooled by the inspired air. All these circumstances create a potentially danger situation in which cerebral structures exposed to the “dead space” of nasal cavity are not only disabled of dissipation of their normal metabolic heat, but are also subject to uncontrolled increases of temperature, due to intense illumination and surgical manipulations.

When looking into the causes of this adverse temperature increase, the telescope itself ought to be considered as a potent source of heat transmitted with seemingly “cold” light. Endoscopic practitioners know that an endoscope left on the operative table with its tip at surgical scrub can burn this material. According to other data, the temperature of the tip of a telescope may reach even 200 °C [7, 8, 17]. ENT surgeons have already signaled the problem of temperature, indicating that heat generated on the tip of the endoscope can harm intranasal structures [7, 8, 17]. Nevertheless, this problem has never been addressed in relation to skull base surgery through extended endoscopic approaches.

These procedures are much more extensive than “typical” pituitary surgery, which is longer and performed with the telescope fixed for a long time in a close distance to operated structures. Wide exposure creates a large cavity in which the telescope can be freely manipulated with no need of frequent cleaning with saline. The anatomical mucosal structures are either resected, pushed aside or harvested for closure thus depriving the nose of the convectional heat clearance. Our temperature records illustrate that the temperature of the operative field in such instances increases incessantly and reaches a potentially dangerous level of 42 °C and more. Such temperature elevation can be potentially tolerable when confined to the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses or clivus, though its real direct biological effects and delayed consequences are not known and need further studies. Specifically, the rate of such complications like infections, CSF leaks or dysfunctions of neighboring neural structures can potentially be influenced by thermal stress/injury.

Obviously, a real danger appears when temperature increases to the level above 42 °C within the intradural space. This happens when the telescope is fixed at a close distance to the intradural structures to obtain high magnification. In our patients, temperature at this stage of the operation increased incidentally even up to 43.6 °C and a mean temperature of the operative field in three patients during the intradural phase of operation was 41.7 °C.

Besides heat transmission from the telescope, bone drilling, ultrasonic aspiration and cauterization must also be considered as potential heat sources contributing to increase of the temperature. Especially bone drilling was demonstrated to increase the local temperature even to the level of 50–60 °C within seconds. This can be due to a fact that bone drilling in a closed space and under endoscopic visualization cannot be carried out with any extensive irrigation, because splashing bone dust soaked with water would get the tip of the scope messy. For this reason, bone drilling (in a contrast to microscopic operations), is usually performed in a dry field, irrigated only when the drill stops.

The aim of this study was to examine changes of temperature of the operative field during routine endoscopic procedures while the surgeon was not aware of current temperature level. This is why both suctioning and flushing of the field with the saline solution were used with no intention of temperature reduction, but rather to clear the vision. Normally the surgeon tends to keep the operative field as dry as possible because this enables fast progression of the procedure. Also, in our set-up flushing with saline was used moderately, usually after each session of bone drilling or cauterization. It can also be added that the Clear Vision system set (Karl Storz Endoscope) that is dedicated for cranial base surgery, flushes only the tip of the endoscope and not the operative field. As a matter of fact, such sudden and unexpectedly high increases of temperature associated with surgical manipulation under endoscope came as an surprising finding. The only remedy we can propose is to perform drilling, cauterization and ultrasound aspiration in short, few second sessions with associated suction. The exact site of bone drilling ought to be changed for each drilling session, and the field must be spilled with saline more often than is needed for maintenance of clear vision.

Limitations of the study

Measurement of the temperature of the operative field deep in the nasal cavity was a demanding task. We tried to place a thermocouple and keep it close to the site of surgical manipulation, which was not always possible because the probe often slipped out and was pushed away by working instruments. For this reason, the temperature records obtained are not smooth and in many moments, the recorded temperature turned out to be even lower than the trunk core temperature. Nevertheless, what really matters are the highest recorded temperatures, as they can endanger the operated structures. What is important, the temperature in many moments or periods was much higher than one could have expected. Moreover, it must be also noted that the tip of the thermocouple relied rather on a certain distance from the exact site of surgical action like bone drilling or cauterization, and therefore the temperature in these critical places was likely to be even higher.

Conclusion

Endoscopic skull base surgery is associated with an incessant increase of the temperature of the operated structures. Additionally, the temperature can peak suddenly to levels that can harm neighboring biological structures and possibly influence the rate of postoperative complications.