Literature DB >> 23493216

Assessing the performance of atlas-based prefrontal brain parcellation in an aging cohort.

Benjamin S Aribisala1, Simon R Cox, Karen J Ferguson, Sarah E MacPherson, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Natalie A Royle, Maria C Valdés Hernández, Mark E Bastin, Ian J Deary, Joanna M Wardlaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether atlas-based parcellation is suitable in aging cohorts because age-related brain changes confound the performance of automatic methods. We assessed atlas-based parcellation of the prefrontal lobe in an aging population using visual assessment and volumetric and spatial concordance.
METHODS: We used an atlas-based approach to parcellate brain MR images of 90 non-demented healthy adults, aged 72.7 ± 0.7 years, and assessed performance.
RESULTS: Volumetric assessment showed that both single-atlas- and multi-atlas-based methods performed acceptably (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.74-0.76). Spatial overlap measurements showed that multi-atlas (dice coefficient [DC], 0.84) offered an improvement over the single-atlas (DC, 0.75-0.78) approach. Visual assessment also showed that multi-atlas outperformed single atlas and identified an additional postprocessing step of cerebrospinal fluid removal, enhancing concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86; DC, 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Atlas-based parcellation performed reasonably well in the aging population. Rigorous performance assessment aided method refinement and emphasizes the importance of age matching and postprocessing. Further work is required in more varied subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23493216      PMCID: PMC3836171          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828004ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  37 in total

1.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; André van der Kouwe; Christophe Destrieux; Eric Halgren; Florent Ségonne; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Larry J Seidman; Jill Goldstein; David Kennedy; Verne Caviness; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Comparison and evaluation of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures in brain MRI.

Authors:  K O Babalola; B Patenaude; P Aljabar; J Schnabel; D Kennedy; W Crum; S Smith; T F Cootes; M Jenkinson; D Rueckert
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Comparative study of standard space and real space analysis of quantitative MR brain data.

Authors:  Benjamin S Aribisala; Jiabao He; Andrew M Blamire
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Brain aging, cognition in youth and old age and vascular disease in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: rationale, design and methodology of the imaging protocol.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Mark E Bastin; Maria C Valdés Hernández; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Natalie A Royle; Zoe Morris; Jonathan D Clayden; Elaine M Sandeman; Elizabeth Eadie; Catherine Murray; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.266

8.  Elastically deforming 3D atlas to match anatomical brain images.

Authors:  J C Gee; M Reivich; R Bajcsy
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers.

Authors:  Naftali Raz; Ulman Lindenberger; Karen M Rodrigue; Kristen M Kennedy; Denise Head; Adrienne Williamson; Cheryl Dahle; Denis Gerstorf; James D Acker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stéphanie Debette; H S Markus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-26
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Use of radiomic features and support vector machine to distinguish Parkinson's disease cases from normal controls.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Jie-Hui Jiang; Li Chen; Jia-Ying Lu; Jing-Jie Ge; Feng-Tao Liu; Jin-Tai Yu; Wei Lin; Chuan-Tao Zuo; Jian Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Serial MRI studies over 12 months using manual and atlas-based region of interest in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Ashwag R Alruwaili; Kerstin Pannek; Robert D Henderson; Marcus Gray; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Pamela A McCombe
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 1.930

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.