Literature DB >> 25427776

An analysis of cattle farmers' perceptions of drivers and barriers to on-farm control of Escherichia coli O157.

L Toma1, J C Low2, B Vosough Ahmadi1, L Matthews3, A W Stott4.   

Abstract

Structural equation modelling and survey data were used to test determinants' influence on farmers' intentions towards Escherichia coli O157 on-farm control. Results suggest that farmers more likely to show willingness to spend money/time or vaccinate to control Escherichia coli O157 are those: who think farmers are most responsible for control; whose income depends more on opening farms to the public; with stronger disease control attitudes; affected by outbreaks; with better knowledge and more informed; with stronger perceptions of biosecurity measures' practicality; using a health plan; who think farmers are the main beneficiaries of control; and whose farms are dairy rather than beef. The findings might suggest that farmers may implement on-farm controls for E. coli O157 if they identify a clear hazard and if there is greater knowledge of the safety and efficacy of the proposed controls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes and behaviour; E. coli O157 on-farm control; UK cattle farmers; information and knowledge; structural equation modelling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25427776      PMCID: PMC9151035          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268814003045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  16 in total

Review 1.  The role of the public sector in the development and implementation of animal health policies.

Authors:  J M Ekboir
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  1999-05-31       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  A conceptual framework for the economic analysis of factors influencing decision-making of small-scale farmers in animal health management.

Authors:  P Chilonda; G Van Huylenbroeck
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.181

3.  Risk factors for sporadic cases of Escherichia coli O157 infection: the importance of contact with animal excreta.

Authors:  M E Locking; S J O'Brien; W J Reilly; E M Wright; D M Campbell; J E Coia; L M Browning; C N Ramsay
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries.

Authors:  G J Gunn; C Heffernan; M Hall; A McLeod; M Hovi
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms.

Authors:  Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Alasdair J C Cook; Eamon Watson; Mirjam Nielen; Lesley Larkin; Marion Wooldridge; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  The relationship between lay and technical views of Escherichia coli O157 risk.

Authors:  N J C Strachan; C J Hunter; C D R Jones; R S Wilson; S Ethelberg; P Cross; A P Williams; L MacRitchie; O Rotariu; D Chadwick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Determinants of biosecurity behaviour of British cattle and sheep farmers-a behavioural economics analysis.

Authors:  Luiza Toma; Alistair W Stott; Claire Heffernan; Siân Ringrose; George J Gunn
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Risk factors for and prevention of sporadic infections with vero cytotoxin (shiga toxin) producing Escherichia coli O157.

Authors:  S M Parry; R L Salmon; G A Willshaw; T Cheasty
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A linear programming approach to estimate the economic impact of bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) at the whole-farm level in Scotland.

Authors:  A W Stott; J Lloyd; R W Humphry; G J Gunn
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Predicting the public health benefit of vaccinating cattle against Escherichia coli O157.

Authors:  Louise Matthews; Richard Reeve; David L Gally; J Chris Low; Mark E J Woolhouse; Sean P McAteer; Mary E Locking; Margo E Chase-Topping; Daniel T Haydon; Lesley J Allison; Mary F Hanson; George J Gunn; Stuart W J Reid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.

Authors:  Arata Hidano; Gareth Enticott; Robert M Christley; M Carolyn Gates
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-21

2.  Decision-making in livestock biosecurity practices amidst environmental and social uncertainty: Evidence from an experimental game.

Authors:  Scott C Merrill; Christopher J Koliba; Susan M Moegenburg; Asim Zia; Jason Parker; Timothy Sellnow; Serge Wiltshire; Gabriela Bucini; Caitlin Danehy; Julia M Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Preliminary insight into horse owners' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, exotic diseases in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kelsey L Spence; Jacqueline M Cardwell; Josh Slater; Sarah M Rosanowski
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Dairy farmers' decision-making to implement biosecurity measures: A study of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Sebastián Moya; Francisco Tirado; Josep Espluga; Giovanna Ciaravino; Ramon Armengol; Javier Diéguez; Eduardo Yus; Bibiana Benavides; Jordi Casal; Alberto Allepuz
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.