BACKGROUND: Slow-waves modulate the pattern of small intestine contractions. However, the large-scale spatial organization of intestinal slow-wave pacesetting remains uncertain because most previous studies have had limited resolution. This study applied high-resolution (HR) mapping to evaluate intestinal pacesetting mechanisms and propagation patterns in vivo. METHODS: HR serosal mapping was performed in anesthetized pigs using flexible arrays (256 electrodes; 32 × 8; 4 mm spacing), applied along the jejunum. Slow-wave propagation patterns, frequencies, and velocities were calculated. Slow-wave initiation sources were identified and analyzed by animation and isochronal activation mapping. KEY RESULTS: Analysis comprised 32 recordings from nine pigs (mean duration 5.1 ± 3.9 min). Slow-wave propagation was analyzed, and a total of 26 sources of slow-wave initiation were observed and classified as focal pacemakers (31%), sites of functional re-entry (23%) and circumferential re-entry (35%), or indeterminate sources (11%). The mean frequencies of circumferential and functional re-entry were similar (17.0 ± 0.3 vs 17.2 ± 0.4 cycle min(-1) ; P = 0.5), and greater than that of focal pacemakers (12.7 ± 0.8 cycle min(-1) ; P < 0.001). Velocity was anisotropic (12.9 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) circumferential vs 9.0 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) longitudinal; P < 0.05), contributing to the onset and maintenance of re-entry. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study has shown multiple patterns of slow-wave initiation in the jejunum of anesthetized pigs. These results constitute the first description and analysis of circumferential re-entry in the gastrointestinal tract and functional re-entry in the in vivo small intestine. Re-entry can control the direction, pattern, and frequency of slow-wave propagation, and its occurrence and functional significance merit further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Slow-waves modulate the pattern of small intestine contractions. However, the large-scale spatial organization of intestinal slow-wave pacesetting remains uncertain because most previous studies have had limited resolution. This study applied high-resolution (HR) mapping to evaluate intestinal pacesetting mechanisms and propagation patterns in vivo. METHODS: HR serosal mapping was performed in anesthetized pigs using flexible arrays (256 electrodes; 32 × 8; 4 mm spacing), applied along the jejunum. Slow-wave propagation patterns, frequencies, and velocities were calculated. Slow-wave initiation sources were identified and analyzed by animation and isochronal activation mapping. KEY RESULTS: Analysis comprised 32 recordings from nine pigs (mean duration 5.1 ± 3.9 min). Slow-wave propagation was analyzed, and a total of 26 sources of slow-wave initiation were observed and classified as focal pacemakers (31%), sites of functional re-entry (23%) and circumferential re-entry (35%), or indeterminate sources (11%). The mean frequencies of circumferential and functional re-entry were similar (17.0 ± 0.3 vs 17.2 ± 0.4 cycle min(-1) ; P = 0.5), and greater than that of focal pacemakers (12.7 ± 0.8 cycle min(-1) ; P < 0.001). Velocity was anisotropic (12.9 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) circumferential vs 9.0 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) longitudinal; P < 0.05), contributing to the onset and maintenance of re-entry. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study has shown multiple patterns of slow-wave initiation in the jejunum of anesthetized pigs. These results constitute the first description and analysis of circumferential re-entry in the gastrointestinal tract and functional re-entry in the in vivo small intestine. Re-entry can control the direction, pattern, and frequency of slow-wave propagation, and its occurrence and functional significance merit further investigation.
Authors: Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Gregory O'Grady; Peng Du; Andrew J Pullan; Leo K Cheng Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: G O'Grady; P Du; N Paskaranandavadivel; T R Angeli; W J E P Lammers; S J Asirvatham; J A Windsor; G Farrugia; A J Pullan; L K Cheng Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Timothy R Angeli; Peng Du; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Patrick W M Janssen; Arthur Beyder; Roger G Lentle; Ian P Bissett; Leo K Cheng; Gregory O'Grady Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Terence P Mayne; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Jonathan C Erickson; Gregory OGrady; Leo K Cheng; Timothy R Angeli Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Gregory O'Grady; Tim H-H Wang; Peng Du; Tim Angeli; Wim J E P Lammers; Leo K Cheng Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.557
Authors: Timothy R Angeli; Leo K Cheng; Peng Du; Tim Hsu-Han Wang; Cheryl E Bernard; Maria-Giuliana Vannucchi; Maria Simonetta Faussone-Pellegrini; Christopher Lahr; Ryash Vather; John A Windsor; Gianrico Farrugia; Thomas L Abell; Gregory O'Grady Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 22.682