Literature DB >> 23489761

Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.

Manuel Cruz-Ramírez1, César Hervás-Martínez, Juan Carlos Fernández, Javier Briceño, Manuel de la Mata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The optimal allocation of organs in liver transplantation is a problem that can be resolved using machine-learning techniques. Classical methods of allocation included the assignment of an organ to the first patient on the waiting list without taking into account the characteristics of the donor and/or recipient. In this study, characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant organ were used to determine graft survival. We utilised a dataset of liver transplants collected by eleven Spanish hospitals that provides data on the survival of patients three months after their operations. METHODS AND MATERIAL: To address the problem of organ allocation, the memetic Pareto evolutionary non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm 2 (MPENSGA2 algorithm), a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, was used to train radial basis function neural networks, where accuracy was the measure used to evaluate model performance, along with the minimum sensitivity measurement. The neural network models obtained from the Pareto fronts were used to develop a rule-based system. This system will help medical experts allocate organs.
RESULTS: The models obtained with the MPENSGA2 algorithm generally yielded competitive results for all performance metrics considered in this work, namely the correct classification rate (C), minimum sensitivity (MS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), root mean squared error (RMSE) and Cohen's kappa (Kappa). In general, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm demonstrated a better performance than the mono-objective algorithm, especially with regard to the MS extreme of the Pareto front, which yielded the best values of MS (48.98) and AUC (0.5659). The rule-based system efficiently complements the current allocation system (model for end-stage liver disease, MELD) based on the principles of efficiency and equity. This complementary effect occurred in 55% of the cases used in the simulation. The proposed rule-based system minimises the prediction probability error produced by two sets of models (one of them formed by models guided by one of the objectives (entropy) and the other composed of models guided by the other objective (MS)), such that it maximises the probability of success in liver transplants, with success based on graft survival three months post-transplant.
CONCLUSION: The proposed rule-based system is objective, because it does not involve medical experts (the expert's decision may be biased by several factors, such as his/her state of mind or familiarity with the patient). This system is a useful tool that aids medical experts in the allocation of organs; however, the final allocation decision must be made by an expert.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489761     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  10 in total

1.  Artificial neural networks can predict trauma volume and acuity regardless of center size and geography: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Bradley M Dennis; David P Stonko; Rachael A Callcut; Richard A Sidwell; Nicole A Stassen; Mitchell J Cohen; Bryan A Cotton; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Ultrasound features and the diagnostic strategy of subhepatic appendicitis.

Authors:  Dong Yu; Chenyao Gu; Shuchen Zhang; Hui Yang; Taotao Yao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-09

3.  Israeli Medical Experts' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences in Allocating Donor Organs for Transplantation.

Authors:  Amir Elalouf
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Lawrence Lau; Yamuna Kankanige; Benjamin Rubinstein; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; James Bailey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Training and Validation of Deep Neural Networks for the Prediction of 90-Day Post-Liver Transplant Mortality Using UNOS Registry Data.

Authors:  Brent D Ershoff; Christine K Lee; Christopher L Wray; Vatche G Agopian; Gregor Urban; Pierre Baldi; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Using machine learning methods to determine a typology of patients with HIV-HCV infection to be treated with antivirals.

Authors:  Antonio Rivero-Juárez; David Guijo-Rubio; Francisco Tellez; Rosario Palacios; Dolores Merino; Juan Macías; Juan Carlos Fernández; Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez; Antonio Rivero; César Hervás-Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in hepatology, liver surgery and transplantation: Emerging applications and frontiers of research.

Authors:  Fadl H Veerankutty; Govind Jayan; Manish Kumar Yadav; Krishnan Sarojam Manoj; Abhishek Yadav; Sindhu Radha Sadasivan Nair; T U Shabeerali; Varghese Yeldho; Madhu Sasidharan; Shiraz Ahmad Rather
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

8.  Machine learning to guide clinical decision-making in abdominal surgery-a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jonas Henn; Andreas Buness; Matthias Schmid; Jörg C Kalff; Hanno Matthaei
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Andrea Peloso; Beat Moeckli; Vaihere Delaune; Graziano Oldani; Axel Andres; Philippe Compagnon
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.842

10.  Identification and weighting of kidney allocation criteria: a novel multi-expert fuzzy method.

Authors:  Nasrin Taherkhani; Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri; Shadi Shafaghi; Toktam Khatibi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.