Literature DB >> 31926745

Training and Validation of Deep Neural Networks for the Prediction of 90-Day Post-Liver Transplant Mortality Using UNOS Registry Data.

Brent D Ershoff1, Christine K Lee2, Christopher L Wray3, Vatche G Agopian4, Gregor Urban5, Pierre Baldi6, Maxime Cannesson3.   

Abstract

Prediction models of post-liver transplant mortality are crucial so that donor organs are not allocated to recipients with unreasonably high probabilities of mortality. Machine learning algorithms, particularly deep neural networks (DNNs), can often achieve higher predictive performance than conventional models. In this study, we trained a DNN to predict 90-day post-transplant mortality using preoperative variables and compared the performance to that of the Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (SOFT) and Balance of Risk (BAR) scores, using United Network of Organ Sharing data on adult patients who received a deceased donor liver transplant between 2005 and 2015 (n = 57,544). The DNN was trained using 202 features, and the best DNN's architecture consisted of 5 hidden layers with 110 neurons each. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of the best DNN model was 0.703 (95% CI: 0.682-0.726) as compared to 0.655 (95% CI: 0.633-0.678) and 0.688 (95% CI: 0.667-0.711) for the BAR score and SOFT score, respectively. In conclusion, despite the complexity of DNN, it did not achieve a significantly higher discriminative performance than the SOFT score. Future risk models will likely benefit from the inclusion of other data sources, including high-resolution clinical features for which DNNs are particularly apt to outperform conventional statistical methods.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31926745      PMCID: PMC7523496          DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  35 in total

1.  Learning to predict chemical reactions.

Authors:  Matthew A Kayala; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Jonathan H Chen; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Learning temporal rules to forecast instability in continuously monitored patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Guillame-Bert; Artur Dubrawski; Donghan Wang; Marilyn Hravnak; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Improving the Prediction of Mortality in the High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Liver Transplant Recipient: A Role for the Left Atrial Volume Index.

Authors:  B D Ershoff; J S Gordin; G Vorobiof; D Elashoff; R H Steadman; J C Scovotti; C L Wray
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Searching for exotic particles in high-energy physics with deep learning.

Authors:  P Baldi; P Sadowski; D Whiteson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany--limitations of the 'sickest first'-concept.

Authors:  Tobias J Weismüller; Panagiotis Fikatas; Jan Schmidt; Ana P Barreiros; Gerd Otto; Susanne Beckebaum; Andreas Paul; Markus N Scherer; Hartmut H Schmidt; Hans J Schlitt; Peter Neuhaus; Jürgen Klempnauer; Johann Pratschke; Michael P Manns; Christian P Strassburg
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Prediction of cardiac complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tamer R Fouad; Wael M Abdel-Razek; Kelly W Burak; Vincent G Bain; Samuel S Lee
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Lawrence Lau; Yamuna Kankanige; Benjamin Rubinstein; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; James Bailey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.

Authors:  Niraj M Desai; Kevin C Mange; Michael D Crawford; Peter L Abt; Adam M Frank; Joseph W Markmann; Ergun Velidedeoglu; William C Chapman; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Donor-recipient matching: myths and realities.

Authors:  Javier Briceño; Ruben Ciria; Manuel de la Mata
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Rana; M A Hardy; K J Halazun; D C Woodland; L E Ratner; B Samstein; J V Guarrera; R S Brown; J C Emond
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  7 in total

1.  Machine Learning Consensus Clustering of Morbidly Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.

Authors:  Charat Thongprayoon; Shennen A Mao; Caroline C Jadlowiec; Michael A Mao; Napat Leeaphorn; Wisit Kaewput; Pradeep Vaitla; Pattharawin Pattharanitima; Supawit Tangpanithandee; Pajaree Krisanapan; Fawad Qureshi; Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn; Matthew Cooper; Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Distinct Phenotypes of Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States with Limited Functional Status as Identified through Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.

Authors:  Charat Thongprayoon; Caroline C Jadlowiec; Wisit Kaewput; Pradeep Vaitla; Shennen A Mao; Michael A Mao; Napat Leeaphorn; Fawad Qureshi; Pattharawin Pattharanitima; Fahad Qureshi; Prakrati C Acharya; Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn; Matthew Cooper; Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Discriminating cell line specific features of antibiotic-resistant strains of Escherichia coli from Raman spectra via machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Zahn; Arno Germond; Alice Y Lundgren; Marcus T Cicerone
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Role of three-dimensional printing and artificial intelligence in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Chrysanthos D Christou; Georgios Tsoulfas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Machine learning to guide clinical decision-making in abdominal surgery-a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jonas Henn; Andreas Buness; Matthias Schmid; Jörg C Kalff; Hanno Matthaei
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  The promise of machine learning applications in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Neta Gotlieb; Amirhossein Azhie; Divya Sharma; Ashley Spann; Nan-Ji Suo; Jason Tran; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Bo Wang; Anna Goldenberg; Michael Chassé; Heloise Cardinal; Joseph Paul Cohen; Andrea Lodi; Melanie Dieude; Mamatha Bhat
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Deep learning quantification of percent steatosis in donor liver biopsy frozen sections.

Authors:  Lulu Sun; Jon N Marsh; Matthew K Matlock; Ling Chen; Joseph P Gaut; Elizabeth M Brunt; S Joshua Swamidass; Ta-Chiang Liu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.143

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.