Literature DB >> 23489482

Competition avoidance drives individual differences in response to a changing food resource in sticklebacks.

Kate L Laskowski1, Alison M Bell.   

Abstract

Within the same population, individuals often differ in how they respond to changes in their environment. A recent series of models predicts that competition in a heterogeneous environment might promote between-individual variation in behavioural plasticity. We tested groups of sticklebacks in patchy foraging environments that differed in the level of competition. We also tested the same individuals across two different social groups and while alone to determine the social environment's influence on behavioural plasticity. In support of model predictions, individuals consistently differed in behavioural plasticity when the presence of conspecifics influenced the potential payoffs of a foraging opportunity. Whether individuals maintained their level of behavioural plasticity when placed in a new social group depended on the environmental heterogeneity. By explicitly testing predictions of recent theoretical models, we provide evidence for the types of ecological conditions under which we would expect, and not expect, variation in behavioural plasticity to be favoured.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489482      PMCID: PMC3972385          DOI: 10.1111/ele.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  23 in total

1.  The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together?

Authors:  L Barber; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory.

Authors:  G Beauchamp
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Niels J Dingemanse; Christiaan Both; Piet J Drent; Joost M Tinbergen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency.

Authors:  Max Wolf; G Sander Van Doorn; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Alison Bell; J Chadwick Johnson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Denis Réale; Simon M Reader; Daniel Sol; Peter T McDougall; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-05

7.  Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  T J Dewitt; A Sih; D S Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Disentangling the roles of frequency-vs. state-dependence in generating individual differences in behavioural plasticity.

Authors:  Kimberley J Mathot; Piet J van den Hout; Theunis Piersma; Bart Kempenaers; Denis Réale; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Marc S Botham; Daniel J Hoare; Richard James; Mark Broom; Jean-Guy J Godin; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Iterative development and the scope for plasticity: contrasts among trait categories in an adaptive radiation.

Authors:  S A Foster; M A Wund; M A Graham; R L Earley; R Gardiner; T Kearns; J A Baker
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The multidimensional behavioural hypervolumes of two interacting species predict their space use and survival.

Authors:  James L L Lichtenstein; Colin M Wright; Brendan McEwen; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Simon Pearish; Miles Bensky; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Adv Ecol Res       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.429

5.  Strong personalities, not social niches, drive individual differences in social behaviours in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Individual variation in functional response parameters is explained by body size but not by behavioural types in a poeciliid fish.

Authors:  Arne Schröder; Gregor Kalinkat; Robert Arlinghaus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Towards powerful experimental and statistical approaches to study intraindividual variability in labile traits.

Authors:  David J Mitchell; Benjamin G Fanson; Christa Beckmann; Peter A Biro
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Repeatability and consistency of individual behaviour in juvenile and adult Eurasian harvest mice.

Authors:  Andrea C Schuster; Teresa Carl; Katharina Foerster
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-02-24

9.  Extensive behavioural divergence following colonisation of the freshwater environment in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Carole Di-Poi; Jennyfer Lacasse; Sean M Rogers; Nadia Aubin-Horth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recent social conditions affect boldness repeatability in individual sticklebacks.

Authors:  Jolle Wolter Jolles; Benjamin Aaron Taylor; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.