Literature DB >> 11027477

Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory.

G Beauchamp1.   

Abstract

In population games, the optimal behaviour of a forager depends partly on courses of action selected by other individuals in the population. How individuals learn to allocate effort in foraging games involving frequency-dependent payoffs has been little examined. The performance of three different learning rules was investigated in several types of habitats in each of two population games. Learning rules allow individuals to weigh information about the past and the present and to choose among alternative patterns of behaviour. In the producer-scrounger game, foragers use producer to locate food patches and scrounger to exploit the food discoveries of others. In the ideal free distribution game, foragers that experience feeding interference from companions distribute themselves among heterogeneous food patches. In simulations of each population game, the use of different learning rules induced large variation in foraging behaviour, thus providing a tool to assess the relevance of each learning rule in experimental systems. Rare mutants using alternative learning rules often successfully invaded populations of foragers using other rules indicating that some learning rules are not stable when pitted against each other. Learning rules often closely approximated optimal behaviour in each population game suggesting that stimulus-response learning of contingencies created by foraging companions could be sufficient to perform at near-optimal level in two population games. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027477     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  16 in total

1.  Recombination and the evolution of coordinated phenotypic expression in a frequency-dependent game.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Simple learning rules to cope with changing environments.

Authors:  Roderich Gross; Alasdair I Houston; Edmund J Collins; John M McNamara; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The role of beginner's luck in learning to prefer risky patches by socially foraging house sparrows.

Authors:  Tomer Ilan; Edith Katsnelson; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Evolution of learned strategy choice in a frequency-dependent game.

Authors:  Edith Katsnelson; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Relationship between individual and group learning in a marine teleost: A case study with sea bass under self-feeding conditions.

Authors:  David Benhaïm; Sébastien Ferrari; Tatiana Colchen; Béatrice Chatain; Marie-Laure Bégout
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Competition for resources can explain patterns of social and individual learning in nature.

Authors:  Marco Smolla; R Tucker Gilman; Tobias Galla; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Co-evolution of learning complexity and social foraging strategies.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  LEARNING TO CHOOSE AMONG SOCIAL FORAGING STRATEGIES IN ADULT HOUSE SPARROWS (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  Amos Belmaker; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.897

10.  Competition avoidance drives individual differences in response to a changing food resource in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.