Literature DB >> 23486334

Choline PET or PET/CT and biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Evangelista1, Fabio Zattoni, Andrea Guttilla, Giorgio Saladini, Filiberto Zattoni, Patrick M Colletti, Domenico Rubello.   

Abstract

AIM: The increase of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the most sensitive tool for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence, although this measure cannot distinguish between local, regional, or distant recurrence. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-choline and 11C-choline PET or PET/CT in detection of locoregional or distant metastases in PCa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar search was carried out in order to select English-language articles dealing with diagnostic performance of both 18F-choline and 11C-choline PET for the detection of PCa recurrence after RP or EBRT. Articles were included only if absolute numbers of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative test results were available or derivable from the text and regarded local, lymph node, and distant metastases. Reviews, clinical reports, and editorial articles were excluded. All complete studies were re-analyzed thus performing a quantitative analysis.
RESULTS: From the years 2000 to 2012, we found 53 complete articles that critically evaluated the role of choline PET in restaging patients with PCa recurrence. The meta-analysis was carried out and dealt with 19 selected studies (12 studies for all sites of disease, 3 for lymph node metastases, and 4 for local recurrence), with a total of 1555 patients. The meta-analysis provided a pooled sensitivity of 85.6% (95% CI: 82.9%-88.1%) and pooled specificity of 92.6% (95% CI: 90.1%-94.6%) for all sites of disease (prostatic fossa, lymph nodes, and bone), a pooled sensitivity of 75.4% (95% CI: 66.9%-82.6%) and pooled specificity of 82% (95% CI: 68.6%-91.4%) for prostatic fossa recurrence, and a pooled sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 90.5%-100%) and pooled specificity of 81.8% (95% CI: 48.2%-97.7%) for lymph node metastases. The heterogeneity ranged between 0.00% and 88.6%. The diagnostic odds ratios were 62.123 (95% CI: 24.783-155.72), 5.869 (95% CI: 1.818-18.946), and 138.57 (95% CI: 11.27-1703.8), respectively, for all sites of disease, local recurrence, and lymph node disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Choline PET and PET/CT represent high sensitivity and specificity techniques for the detection of locoregional and distant metastases in PCa patients with recurrence of disease. Moreover, a high diagnostic odds ratio was found for the identification of lymph node disease in patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486334     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182867f3c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  85 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Writing PET into existence.

Authors:  A Chiti; M Kirienko; E Incerti; M Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  11C-Choline Pharmacokinetics in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Milan Grkovski; Karem Gharzeddine; Peter Sawan; Heiko Schöder; Laure Michaud; Wolfgang A Weber; John L Humm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 7.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 8.  Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Magnetta; David Casalino; Matthew T Heller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

10.  Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Katarzyna J Macura; Anthony Ciarallo; Esther Mena; Amanda Blackford; Rosa Nadal; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; Ashley E Ross; Philip W Kantoff; Daniel P Holt; Robert F Dannals; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.