Literature DB >> 23481667

Comparing direct costs of facility-based Shang Ring provision versus a standard surgical technique for voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia.

John H Bratt1, Zude Zyambo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is needed to realize potential reductions in HIV incidence in sub-Saharan Africa. New disposable VMMC devices such as the Shang Ring may offer several advantages over standard surgery, including lower costs.
METHODS: We compared direct costs of the Shang Ring and dorsal slit techniques for delivery of VMMC in the context of a randomized-controlled trial carried out in Zambia in 2011. Information on direct costs of clinician time, disposable supplies, and reusable medical instruments were collected by study staff.
RESULTS: During the trial, the direct cost of 1 VMMC procedure using the Shang Ring device was US $18.21, whereas the direct cost of using dorsal slit was US $17.67. Higher costs of clinician time related to dorsal slit VMMC were offset by higher costs of disposable supplies with the Shang Ring approach. DISCUSSION: Although direct costs were roughly equivalent during this small-scale trial, with the increased demand from scaling up VMMC, a Shang Ring team could provide services at a substantially lower average total cost due to the potential for more intensive use of staff and other fixed resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481667     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828e9526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  8 in total

1.  Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.

Authors:  Richard Lee; E Charles Osterberg; Philip S Li; Marc Goldstein; Mark Barone; Stephanie L Combes; David Sokal; Ron Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; Stephen Watya
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Lower HIV Risk Among Circumcised Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Interaction With Anal Sex Role in a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Han-Zhu Qian; Yuhua Ruan; Yu Liu; Douglas F Milam; Hans M L Spiegel; Lu Yin; Dongliang Li; Bryan E Shepherd; Yiming Shao; Sten H Vermund
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 3.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Bo-Dong Lv; Shi-Geng Zhang; Xuan-Wen Zhu; Jie Zhang; Gang Chen; Min-Fu Chen; Hong-Liang Shen; Zai-Jun Pei; Zhao-Dian Chen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  How much does it cost to improve access to voluntary medical male circumcision among high-risk, low-income communities in Uganda?

Authors:  Bruce Larson; Allan Tindikahwa; George Mwidu; Hannah Kibuuka; Fred Magala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hu Han; Da-Wei Xie; Xiao-Guang Zhou; Xiao-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Achieving the HIV prevention impact of voluntary medical male circumcision: lessons and challenges for managing programs.

Authors:  Sema K Sgaier; Jason B Reed; Anne Thomas; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Cost drivers for voluntary medical male circumcision using primary source data from sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Lori Bollinger; Adebiyi Adesina; Steven Forsythe; Ramona Godbole; Elan Reuben; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.