Literature DB >> 23480441

Nasotracheal intubation with three indirect laryngoscopes assisted by standard or modified Magill forceps.

S Staar1, I Biesler, D Müller, R Pförtner, C Mohr, H Groeben.   

Abstract

We assessed the effect of modifying standard Magill forceps on the laryngeal introduction of an Eschmann stylet during nasotracheal intubations with three indirect laryngoscopes (Airtraq™, C-MAC(®) or GlideScope(®)) in patients with predicted difficult intubation. We allocated 50 participants to each laryngoscope. The stylet was advanced by one forceps followed by the other (standard or modified), with each sequence allocated to 25/50 for each laryngoscope. There were no differences in rates of failed tracheal intubation with the allocated laryngoscopes: 6/50, 5/50 and 5/50, respectively. An Eschmann stylet was advanced into the trachea less often with the standard forceps (65% vs 93%, p < 0.0001). Mean (SD) time for stylet advancement was longer with the standard forceps, 38 (30) vs 19 (19) s, p < 0.0001. In conclusion, the modified Magill forceps facilitated nasotracheal intubation, independent of the type of indirect laryngoscope. Anaesthesia
© 2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23480441     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Sore Throat After Nasotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Masanori Tsukamoto; Shiori Taura; Sayuri Kadowaki; Takashi Hitosugi; Yoichiro Miki; Takeshi Yokoyama
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Intubation over a bougie: Nasal is not novel.

Authors:  Ron O Abrons; Randy W Loftus
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

3.  A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.

Authors:  Haozhen Zhu; Jinxing Liu; Lulu Suo; Chi Zhou; Yu Sun; Hong Jiang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Comparative evaluation of glidescope videolaryngosocope and conventional macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oropharyngeal cancer surgeries: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Nishkarsh Gupta; Vinod Kumar; Sachidanand Jee Bharti; Rakesh Garg; Rajeev Kumar; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  Role of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Deflation in Facilitating Passage of Nasogastric Tube.

Authors:  Nidhi Bangarwa; Sumedha Vashishth; Vineet Kumar; Prashant Kumar; Preeti Gehlaut
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  Massive ameloblastoma: A case report of difficult fiberoptic intubation.

Authors:  Yuki Shindo; Shinichi Toda; Kanta Kido; Eiji Masaki
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  The GlideScope with modified Magill forceps facilitates nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized patients: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Han Joon Kim; Su In Park; Sang Yun Cho; Min Jae Cho
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 1.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.