Literature DB >> 23479440

Regulated proteolysis: control of the Escherichia coli σ(E)-dependent cell envelope stress response.

Sarah E Barchinger1, Sarah E Ades.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, regulatory proteolysis has emerged as a paradigm for transmembrane signal transduction in all organisms, from bacteria to humans. These conserved proteolytic pathways share a common design that involves the sequential proteolysis of a membrane-bound regulatory protein by two proteases. Proteolysis releases the regulator, which is inactive in its membrane-bound form, into the cytoplasm where it performs its cellular function. One of the best-characterized examples of signal transduction via regulatory proteolysis is the pathway governing the σ(E)-dependent cell envelope stress response in Escherichia coli. In unstressed cells, σ(E) is sequestered at the membrane by the transmembrane anti-sigma factor, RseA. Stresses that compromise the cell envelope and interfere with the proper folding of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) activate the proteolytic pathway. The C-terminal residues of unfolded OMPs bind to the inner membrane protease, DegS, to initiate the proteolytic cascade. DegS removes the periplasmic domain of RseA creating a substrate for the next protease in the pathway, RseP. RseP cleaves RseA in the periplasmic region in a process called regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP). The remaining fragment of RseA is released into the cytoplasm and fully degraded by the ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP, with the assistance of the adaptor protein, SspB, thereby freeing σ(E) to reprogram gene expression. A growing body of evidence indicates that the overall proteolytic framework that governs the σ(E) response is used to regulate similar anti-sigma factor/sigma factor pairs throughout the bacterial world and has been adapted to recognize a wide variety of signals and control systems as diverse as envelope stress responses, sporulation, virulence, and iron-siderophore uptake. In this chapter, we review the extensive physiological, biochemical, and structural studies on the σ(E) system that provide remarkable insights into the mechanistic underpinnings of this regulated proteolytic signal transduction pathway. These studies reveal design principles that are applicable to related proteases and regulatory proteolytic pathways in all domains of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479440     DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5940-4_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subcell Biochem        ISSN: 0306-0225


  31 in total

1.  Precipitation of iron on the surface of Leptospira interrogans is associated with mutation of the stress response metalloprotease HtpX.

Authors:  Rebekah Henry; Miranda Lo; Chenai Khoo; Hailong Zhang; Reinhard I Boysen; Mathieu Picardeau; Gerald L Murray; Dieter M Bulach; Ben Adler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Identification of inhibitors of a bacterial sigma factor using a new high-throughput screening assay.

Authors:  S A El-Mowafi; E Sineva; J N Alumasa; H Nicoloff; J W Tomsho; S E Ades; K C Keiler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Fine-Tuning of σE Activation Suppresses Multiple Assembly-Defective Mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hart; Aileen O'Connell; Kimberly Tang; Joseph S Wzorek; Marcin Grabowicz; Daniel Kahne; Thomas J Silhavy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The apolipoprotein N-acyl transferase Lnt is dispensable for growth in Acinetobacter species.

Authors:  Celena M Gwin; Natalia Prakash; J Christian Belisario; Lubaina Haider; Marlene L Rosen; Luis R Martinez; Nathan W Rigel
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 5.  Stress-induced remodeling of the bacterial proteome.

Authors:  Monica S Guo; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A Suppressor Mutation That Creates a Faster and More Robust σE Envelope Stress Response.

Authors:  Anna Konovalova; Jaclyn A Schwalm; Thomas J Silhavy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Interactions between DksA and Stress-Responsive Alternative Sigma Factors Control Inorganic Polyphosphate Accumulation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Michael J Gray
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Envelope Stress Responses: An Interconnected Safety Net.

Authors:  Marcin Grabowicz; Thomas J Silhavy
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 13.807

9.  Appropriate Regulation of the σE-Dependent Envelope Stress Response Is Necessary To Maintain Cell Envelope Integrity and Stationary-Phase Survival in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hervé Nicoloff; Saumya Gopalkrishnan; Sarah E Ades
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Quantitative assessment of ribosome drop-off in E. coli.

Authors:  Celine Sin; Davide Chiarugi; Angelo Valleriani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.