Literature DB >> 23479232

The evolution of advocacy and orthopaedic surgery.

Manish K Sethi1, Allie Obremskey, Vasanth Sathiyakumar, John T Gill, Richard C Mather.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The future direction of American health care has become increasingly controversial during the last decade. As healthcare costs, quality, and delivery have come under intense scrutiny, physicians play evolving roles as "advocates" for both their profession and patients via healthcare policy. Hospital-physician alignment is critical to the future success of advocacy among orthopaedic surgeons, as both hospitals and physicians are key stakeholders in health care and can work together to influence major health policy decisions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) define the role of advocacy in medicine, specifically within orthopaedic surgery; (2) explore the history of physician advocacy and its evolution; (3) examine the various avenues of involvement for orthopaedic surgeons interested in advocacy; and (4) reflect on the impact of such activities on the future of orthopaedic surgery as it relates to hospital-physician alignment.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature through a bibliographic search of MEDLINE(®) and Google Scholar databases from January 2000 to December 2010 to identify articles related to advocacy and orthopaedic surgery.
RESULTS: Advocacy among orthopaedic surgeons is critical in guiding the future of the American healthcare system. In today's world, advocacy necessitates a wider effort to improve healthcare access, quality, and delivery for patients on a larger scale. The nature of physician advocacy among orthopaedic surgeons is grounded in the desire to serve patients and alleviate their suffering. Participation in medical societies and political campaigns are two avenues of involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The increasing role of government in American health care will require a renewed commitment to advocacy efforts from orthopaedic surgeons. The role of advocacy is rapidly redefining the continuum of care to a trinity of clinical excellence, innovative research, and effective advocacy. Failure to recognize this growing role of advocacy limits the impact we can have for our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479232      PMCID: PMC3706663          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2900-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  3 in total

1.  Politics is nothing but medicine at a larger scale: reflections on public health's biggest idea.

Authors:  J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Perspective: Physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it?

Authors:  Mark A Earnest; Shale L Wong; Steven G Federico
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Perspective: Medical professionalism and medical education should not involve commitments to political advocacy.

Authors:  Thomas S Huddle
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Authors:  David N Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Advocacy efforts in trauma and acute care surgery: learning to walk.

Authors:  Lewis J Kaplan; Erik Barquist; Donald Jenkins; Orlando Kirton
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2017-03-22

3.  Orthopaedic Resident Practice Management and Health Policy Education: Evaluation of Experience and Expectations.

Authors:  Eugene F Stautberg Iii; Jose Romero; Sean Bender; Marc DeHart
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.