Literature DB >> 23479089

Postmarket surveillance of medical devices: current capabilities and future opportunities.

Kathleen Blake1.   

Abstract

Recalls of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) currently impact hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide. Premarket evaluation of CIEDs cannot be expected to eliminate all performance defects. Robust postmarket surveillance systems are needed to promote patient safety and reduce harm. Challenges impacting existing surveillance mechanisms include underreporting of defects, low rates of return of explanted CIEDs, lack of integration of surveillance into normal workflow, underutilization of existing resources including registries, a lack of capacity of aging resources, multiple proprietary platforms that lack interoperability, and the unmet need for common data variables as well as newer methods to generate, synthesize, analyze, and interpret evidence in order to respond rapidly to safety signals. Long-term solutions include establishing a unique device identification system; promoting expanded use of registries for surveillance and post-approval studies; developing additional methods to combine evidence from diverse data sources; creating tools and implementing strategies for universal automatic, triggered electronic event reporting; and refining methods to rapidly identify and interpret safety signals. Protection from litigation and creation of financial and other incentives by legislators, regulators, payers, accreditation organizations, and licensing boards can be expanded to increase participation in device surveillance by clinicians and health care facilities. Research to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of surveillance strategies is needed. Interim solutions to improve CIED surveillance while new initiatives are launched and the system strengthened are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479089     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-013-9778-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  Here we go again--another failure of postmarketing device surveillance.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support): a new paradigm for translating registry data into clinical practice.

Authors:  Marissa A Miller; Karen Ulisney; J Timothy Baldwin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Downloadable software algorithm reduces inappropriate shocks caused by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Charles D Swerdlow; Bruce D Gunderson; Kevin T Ousdigian; Athula Abeyratne; Haresh Sachanandani; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Recommendations from the Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Lead Performance Policies and Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA).

Authors:  William H Maisel; Robert G Hauser; Stephen C Hammill; Robert G Hauser; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Andrew E Epstein; David L Hayes; Joseph S Alpert; Ronald D Berger; Anne B Curtis; Anne M Dubin; N A Mark Estes; Melanie T Gura; Andrew D Krahn; Rachel Lampert; Bruce D Lindsay; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Launching HITECH.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A short history of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons national cardiac database: perceptions of a practicing surgeon.

Authors:  Manuel Caceres; Rebecca L Braud; Harvey Edward Garrett
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The new Sentinel Network--improving the evidence of medical-product safety.

Authors:  Richard Platt; Marcus Wilson; K Arnold Chan; Joshua S Benner; Janet Marchibroda; Mark McClellan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Andrew E Epstein; Anand Irimpen; Robert Schweikert; Charles Love
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009: increasing complexity of patients and procedures.

Authors:  Arnold J Greenspon; Jasmine D Patel; Edmund Lau; Jorge A Ochoa; Daniel R Frisch; Reginald T Ho; Behzad B Pavri; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Thomas P Gross; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Nilsa Loyo-Berrios; Sharon Donnelly; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: implications for clinical cardiology.

Authors:  Benjamin N Rome; Daniel B Kramer; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Medical device postapproval safety monitoring: where does the United States stand?

Authors:  Prashant V Rajan; Daniel B Kramer; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-01-06

3.  Introduction: health policy II. A new era of heath policy in electrophysiology and cardiology.

Authors:  Fred Kusumoto
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  The Role of the FDA and Regulatory Approval of New Devices for Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Shelley A Jazowski; Aaron N Winn
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Recalls of cardiac implants in the last decade: what lessons can we learn?

Authors:  Shixuan Zhang; Christine Kriza; Sandra Schaller; Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead reliability: implications for postmarket surveillance.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Laura A Hatfield; Deepa McGriff; Christopher R Ellis; Melanie T Gura; Michelle Samuel; Linda Kallinen Retel; Robert G Hauser
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.