Literature DB >> 23478635

The predictive validity of the MCAT exam in relation to academic performance through medical school: a national cohort study of 2001-2004 matriculants.

Dana M Dunleavy1, Marc H Kroopnick, Keith W Dowd, Cynthia A Searcy, Xiaohui Zhao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most research examining the predictive validity of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) has focused on the relationship between MCAT scores and scores on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step exams. This study examined whether MCAT scores predict students' unimpeded progress toward graduation (UP), which the authors defined as not withdrawing or being dismissed for academic reasons, graduating within five years of matriculation, and passing the Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge, and Step 2 Clinical Skills exams on the first attempt.
METHOD: Students who matriculated during 2001-2004 at 119 U.S. medical schools were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the relationships between UP and MCAT total scores alone, undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) alone, and UGPAs and MCAT total scores together. All analyses were conducted at the school level and were considered together to evaluate relationships across schools.
RESULTS: The majority of matriculants experienced UP. Together, UGPAs and MCAT total scores predicted UP well. MCAT total scores alone were a better predictor than UGPAs alone. Relationships were similar across schools; however, there was more variability across schools in the relationship between UP and UGPAs than between UP and MCAT total scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of UGPAs and MCAT total scores performs well as a predictor of UP. Both UGPAs and MCAT total scores are strong predictors of academic performance in medical school through graduation, not just the first two years. Further, these relationships generalize across medical schools.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478635     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182864299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  24 in total

1.  A changing tide: what the new 'foundations of behavior' section of the 2015 medical college admissions test® might mean for undergraduate neuroscience programs.

Authors:  J Roxanne Prichard
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Computer-Assisted Decision Support for Student Admissions Based on Their Predicted Academic Performance.

Authors:  Eugene Muratov; Margaret Lewis; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Student Perspectives on the Impact of an Undergraduate Work-Integrated Learning Program on Admission and Transition to Medical School.

Authors:  Rachel McDonald; Adam Bobrowski; Leah Drost; Leigha Rowbottom; Judene Pretti; Hany Soliman; Stephanie Chan; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The new Medical College Admission Test: Implications for teaching psychology.

Authors:  Karen Mitchell; Richard S Lewis; Jason Satterfield; Barry A Hong
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2016 Feb-Mar

5.  Factors Associated with Acceptance of Repeat MCAT Test Takers into a West Virginian Allopathic Medical School.

Authors:  Manuel C Vallejo; Lauren M Wamsley; Christa L Lilly; Emily K Nease; Linda S Nield
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Performing Under Pressure: Varsity Athletes Excel in Medical School.

Authors:  Lindsay C Strowd; Hong Gao; Mary Claire O'Brien; Patrick Reynolds; David Grier; Timothy R Peters
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-05-09

7.  Prediction of Admission Tests for Medical Students' Academic Performance.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Althewini; Noof Al Baz
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-10-14

8.  Graduate Education and Social Stratification.

Authors:  Julie R Posselt; Eric Grodsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2017-05-03

9.  Comparison of first-year grade point average and national board scores between alternative admission track students in a chiropractic program who took or did not take preadmission science courses.

Authors:  Carissa J Manrique; Gene Giggleman
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2019-06-20

10.  Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Laksha Bala; Stephen Pedder; Amir H Sam; Celia Brown
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.