Literature DB >> 23478238

Radiographic and patient-based outcome analysis of different bone-grafting techniques in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with a minimum 4-year follow-up: allograft versus autograft/allograft combination.

Todd J Lansford1, Douglas C Burton, Marc A Asher, Sue-Min Lai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Autograft and allograft have been equally successful in achieving arthrodesis, but whether there is any difference in their effect on patient outcome, especially early, has not been determined.
PURPOSE: To determine if autograft in addition to allograft is associated with decreased healing period pain, increased early function, or both. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: A sample of 47 patients, 20 years or younger with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by the same surgeon at the same institution using third-generation segmental spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis. OUTCOME MEASURE: Function and pain were quantified at periodic intervals using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire. Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were completed.
METHODS: Freeze-dried corticocancellous allograft (AL) was used in 26 patients and allograft plus iliac crest autograft (AL-AU) in 21 patients. Radiographs and outcome measures, including SRS-24 or SRS-22 HRQoL questionnaires, were obtained preoperatively and at intervals with a 4-year follow-up available for 92% (25/26) of AL patients and 90% (19/21) of AL-AU patients.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the AL and AL-AU groups' ages, curve patterns, and complications. Neither group had a major complication or pseudoarthrosis. There were no main curve size differences at any interval. Pain scores were similar at all intervals: AL/AL-AU preoperative, 4.1/4.0; early follow-up (<1 year), 3.7/4.1; midterm follow-up (1-2 years), 4.4/4.6; and late follow-up (>3 years), 4.1/4.0. Function scores were also similar at all intervals: AL/AL-AU preoperative, 4.7/4.6; early follow-up, 4.2/4.3; midterm follow-up, 4.9/4.9; and late follow-up, 4.5/4.4.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of autograft to allograft did not result in decreased pain or increased function at any time interval up to 4 years. We conclude that the addition of iliac crest autograft does not result in any advantage over freeze-dried allograft alone in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478238     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating post-operative pain management at the iliac crest bone graft site: an editorial.

Authors:  Uzondu F Agochukwu; John G DeVine
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

2.  Bone substitutes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using sublaminar bands: is it useful? A case-control study.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Soufiane Ghailane; Jeffrey J Varghese; Matthieu Ollivier; Emilie Peltier; Elie Choufani; Gerard Bollini; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Autograft versus Allograft for Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander Tuchman; Darrel S Brodke; Jim A Youssef; Hans-Jörg Meisel; Joseph R Dettori; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.