Literature DB >> 23477500

Characteristics of scheduled bleeding manipulation with combined hormonal contraception in university students.

Hannah Lakehomer1, Paul F Kaplan, David G Wozniak, Christopher T Minson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information concerning the decision factors and sources of information influencing women who purposefully deviate from the prescribed use of their combined hormone contraceptives to exert elective control of their scheduled bleeding. STUDY
DESIGN: A self-administered email survey of scheduled bleeding practices and beliefs was distributed to 11,900 female students at the University of Oregon. Assessment of survey participant characteristics, scheduled bleeding manipulation features and attitudes and knowledge toward hormonal contraception was analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 1719 respondents to the survey, 1374 (79.9%) reported using combined hormonal contraception currently or recently. Approximately 17% of these women altered their scheduled bleeding pattern by deviating from package instructions. Of these, 50% indicated they delayed or skipped their scheduled bleeding for convenience or personal choice. Within this group, 47% of women indicated they learned to modify their scheduled bleeding from health care professionals, while 30% indicated such knowledge was obtained from family or friends. Characteristics that decreased the likelihood of this practice included being of Asian race, use of hormonal contraceptive for bleeding cycle regulation, following a regular exercise program, and personal preference for a monthly cycle.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of university females who choose to modify their scheduled bleeding cycle with combined hormonal contraceptives do so for convenience rather than to avoid menstrual symptoms, and many learn from nonmedical sources. There is some disparity between the preferences of menstruation frequency and actual scheduled bleeding pattern behaviors, suggesting potential for improvement in patient education.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth control; Contraceptive; Menstrual cycle; Modification; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477500      PMCID: PMC3745796          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  18 in total

1.  Nuisance or natural and healthy: should monthly menstruation be optional for women?

Authors:  S L Thomas; C Ellertson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Menstrual reduction with extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Miller; K M Notter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Menstrual manipulation: options for suppressing the cycle.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Ellen S Rome
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Menstrual suppression for combat operations: advantages of oral contraceptive pills.

Authors:  Nicole C Powell-Dunford; Amanda S Cuda; Jeffrey L Moore; Mark S Crago; Amanda M Kelly; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

5.  Extended cycling of combined hormonal contraceptives in adolescents: physician views and prescribing practices.

Authors:  Kelly L Gerschultz; Gina S Sucato; Teresa R Hennon; Pamela J Murray; Melanie A Gold
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Spanish women's attitudes towards menstruation and use of a continuous, daily use hormonal combined contraceptive regimen.

Authors:  Rafael Sánchez-Borrego; Carmen García-Calvo
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Menstrual suppression using oral contraceptives: survey of deployed female aviation personnel.

Authors:  Nicole Powell-Dunford; Amanda S Cuda; Jeffrey L Moore; Mark S Crago; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2009-11

8.  Attitudes and prescribing patterns of extended-cycle oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Divya L Seval; Terry Buckley; Thomas J Kuehl; Patricia J Sulak
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Hormonal contraceptive practices in young Australian women (≤ 25 years) and their possible impact on menstrual frequency and iron requirements.

Authors:  Alecia J Greig; Michelle A Palmer; Lynne M Chepulis
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2010-06-23

10.  Headaches and oral contraceptives: impact of eliminating the standard 7-day placebo interval.

Authors:  Patricia Sulak; Sherilyn Willis; Thomas Kuehl; Andrea Coffee; Jeffrey Clark
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.887

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  There might be blood: a scoping review on women's responses to contraceptive-induced menstrual bleeding changes.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Rubina Hussain; Amanda Berry
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 2.  Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Andrew M Kaunitz; Johannes Bitzer
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  The myth of menstruation: how menstrual regulation and suppression impact contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Andrea L DeMaria; Beth Sundstrom; Stephanie Meier; Abigail Wiseley
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.