Literature DB >> 21185993

Menstrual suppression for combat operations: advantages of oral contraceptive pills.

Nicole C Powell-Dunford1, Amanda S Cuda, Jeffrey L Moore, Mark S Crago, Amanda M Kelly, Patricia A Deuster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: increasing numbers of women are deployed to austere settings in which menstruation may impose logistical challenges. Minimal data exists about the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) for menstrual suppression in this population. Post-deployment survey was undertaken to establish prevalence of continuous OCP use, perceived barriers, and associations with menstrual burden in a military population within the austere environment.
METHODS: voluntary and anonymous 44-item questionnaire.
RESULTS: of 500 women, 78% (n = 390) had personal experience using OCPs and 66% (n = 330) desired menstrual suppression. However, only 40% (n = 192) reported any OCP use and only 21% (n = 99) reported continuous use during deployment. Sixty-seven percent of women reported some difficulty in daily pill compliance and nearly half (45%) missed ≥ 1 pill per week in the austere setting. Continuous users were nearly twice as compliant as conventional users (p = .019) and compliant OCP users reported significantly less menstrual burden than noncompliant users (p = .017). Almost all women (85%) desired mandatory education about menstrual suppression through OCPs.
CONCLUSION: despite OCP experience and desire for amenorrhea, prevalence of extended cycle OCP use in this population is low. Extended OCPs users in the austere setting report improved compliance and reduced menstrual burden compared with conventional users. Education about OCPs is highly desirable for most military women and may benefit those in austere settings. 2011 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21185993     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  7 in total

Review 1.  Unintended pregnancy and contraception among active-duty servicewomen and veterans.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Sonya Borrero; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on Breast Cancer Pathology.

Authors:  Jesse A Dorchak; Sifat Maria; Joseph L Guarinoni; Anette Duensing; Stella Somiari; Jane Cavanaugh; Brenda Deyarmin; Hai Hu; Joji Iida; Craig D Shriver; Paula A Witt-Enderby
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Characteristics of scheduled bleeding manipulation with combined hormonal contraception in university students.

Authors:  Hannah Lakehomer; Paul F Kaplan; David G Wozniak; Christopher T Minson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Elizabeth Micks; Maria F Gallo; Jeffrey T Jensen; David A Grimes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-29

Review 5.  Healthy, safe and responsible: the modern female traveller.

Authors:  Irmgard L Bauer
Journal:  Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 6.  Menstrual suppression: current perspectives.

Authors:  Paula Adams Hillard
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 7.  Medically induced amenorrhea in female astronauts.

Authors:  Varsha Jain; Virginia E Wotring
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.415

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.