Literature DB >> 23477469

Academic and non-academic selection criteria in predicting medical school performance.

Louise C Urlings-Strop1, Karen M Stegers-Jager, Theo Stijnen, Axel P N Themmen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A two-step selection procedure, consisting of a non-academic and an academic step, was recently shown to select students with a 2.6 times lower risk of early dropout and a higher clerkship Grade Point Average (GPA) than lottery-admitted controls. AIM: To determine the relative contribution of the non-academic and academic steps to differences found in student performance.
METHOD: Lottery-admitted students (n = 653) and three groups of selection procedure participants were compared on early dropout rate and clerkship GPA: (1) all participants (n = 1676), (2) participants who passed step 1, and (3) participants who passed step 2.
RESULTS: Selection procedure participation resulted in a 4.4% lower dropout rate than lottery admission and this difference increased to 5.2% after step 1 and to 8.7% after step 2. Clerkship GPA was significantly higher for participants who passed step 1 than for their lottery-admitted controls. This difference remained significant after the rejection of students on academic criteria in step 2.
CONCLUSION: The lower dropout rate of selected students is related to both self-selection of participants before the start of the selection procedure and the academic part of the selection procedure. The higher clerkship GPA of selected students is almost exclusively related to the non-academic selection criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477469     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of Admission Tests for Medical Students' Academic Performance.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Althewini; Noof Al Baz
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-10-14

2.  The first OSCE; does students' experience of performing in public affect their results?

Authors:  Michael Chan; Nigel Bax; Caroline Woodley; Michael Jennings; Rod Nicolson; Philip Chan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school.

Authors:  Susanna M Lucieer; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Remy M J P Rikers; Axel P N Themmen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Predictive validity of pre-admission assessments on medical student performance.

Authors:  Al-Awwab Dabaliz; Samy Kaadan; M Marwan Dabbagh; Abdulaziz Barakat; Mohammad Abrar Shareef; Mohamad Al-Tannir; Akef Obeidat; Ayman Mohamed
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-24

5.  The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school.

Authors:  Marieke de Visser; Cornelia Fluit; Jaap Fransen; Mieke Latijnhouwers; Janke Cohen-Schotanus; Roland Laan
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alex Mommert; Josefin Wagner; Jana Jünger; Jürgen Westermann
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Predicting Performance in Higher Education Using Proximal Predictors.

Authors:  A Susan M Niessen; Rob R Meijer; Jorge N Tendeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school.

Authors:  Karen M Stegers-Jager
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.