Literature DB >> 23476250

1-Chloro-1H-1,2,3-benzotriazole.

Ming-Yong Yuan1, Xia Zhao, Ling-Li Zheng.   

Abstract

The title compound, C6H4ClN3, is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.007 (3) Å. In the crystal, a short contact of 2.818 (3) Å is observed between N and Cl atoms of adjacent mol-ecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23476250      PMCID: PMC3589014          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures of benzotriazole derivatives, see: Jebas et al. (2012 ▶); Guo et al. (2012 ▶); Selvarathy et al. (2012 ▶); Xu & Shen (2012 ▶). For applications of the title compound, see: Hunter et al. (2006 ▶) and references cited therein. For the biological activity of benzotriazole derivatives, see: Gaikwad et al. (2012 ▶); Dubey et al. (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H4ClN3 M = 153.57 Orthorhombic, a = 22.8022 (11) Å b = 14.2637 (8) Å c = 8.2259 (4) Å V = 2675.4 (2) Å3 Z = 16 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.48 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.42 × 0.34 × 0.32 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur Eos diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.979, T max = 1.000 1503 measured reflections 918 independent reflections 867 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.017

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030 wR(F 2) = 0.060 S = 1.06 918 reflections 91 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 275 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.00 (8) Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044820/xu5634sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044820/xu5634Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044820/xu5634Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H4ClN3Dx = 1.525 Mg m3
Mr = 153.57Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Cell parameters from 738 reflections
a = 22.8022 (11) Åθ = 3.0–28.5°
b = 14.2637 (8) ŵ = 0.48 mm1
c = 8.2259 (4) ÅT = 293 K
V = 2675.4 (2) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 160.42 × 0.34 × 0.32 mm
F(000) = 1248
Agilent Xcalibur Eos diffractometer918 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube867 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 16.0874 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −15→27
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010)k = −16→8
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 1.000l = −9→9
1503 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.060w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0242P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
918 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
91 parametersΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 275 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.00 (8)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl0.31785 (3)0.13250 (5)−0.13509 (9)0.0508 (2)
N10.37734 (9)0.18891 (16)−0.0618 (3)0.0436 (6)
N20.43133 (10)0.15132 (19)−0.0788 (3)0.0544 (7)
N30.46849 (10)0.20933 (18)−0.0121 (4)0.0537 (7)
C10.37873 (11)0.27246 (19)0.0179 (3)0.0369 (6)
C20.43801 (11)0.2849 (2)0.0484 (3)0.0402 (7)
C30.45739 (14)0.3651 (2)0.1311 (4)0.0538 (8)
H30.49690.37510.15310.065*
C40.41526 (15)0.4282 (2)0.1780 (4)0.0577 (9)
H40.42650.48220.23300.069*
C50.35617 (14)0.4133 (2)0.1453 (4)0.0550 (8)
H50.32920.45810.17960.066*
C60.33580 (13)0.3357 (2)0.0649 (4)0.0459 (8)
H60.29620.32620.04350.055*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl0.0413 (4)0.0522 (4)0.0587 (4)−0.0073 (4)−0.0014 (4)−0.0109 (4)
N10.0307 (12)0.0452 (15)0.0549 (15)−0.0005 (12)−0.0016 (12)−0.0116 (13)
N20.0396 (15)0.0519 (17)0.072 (2)0.0078 (12)0.0062 (13)−0.0114 (15)
N30.0327 (12)0.0566 (16)0.0719 (16)0.0032 (14)−0.0019 (13)−0.0092 (13)
C10.0367 (15)0.0383 (16)0.0358 (14)0.0036 (14)−0.0016 (12)0.0000 (13)
C20.0368 (15)0.0404 (16)0.0434 (14)−0.0002 (13)−0.0010 (14)0.0022 (13)
C30.0494 (18)0.057 (2)0.0545 (19)−0.0129 (16)−0.010 (2)−0.0014 (17)
C40.079 (2)0.0376 (18)0.0566 (19)−0.0060 (18)−0.002 (2)−0.0069 (15)
C50.0570 (19)0.0439 (19)0.064 (2)0.0099 (16)0.0071 (18)−0.0067 (18)
C60.0385 (15)0.0440 (19)0.0551 (18)0.0071 (14)−0.0006 (14)−0.0004 (16)
Cl—N11.688 (2)C3—C41.371 (4)
N1—N21.350 (3)C3—H30.9300
N1—C11.360 (3)C4—C51.390 (4)
N2—N31.305 (3)C4—H40.9300
N3—C21.376 (4)C5—C61.371 (4)
C1—C21.386 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—C61.386 (4)C6—H60.9300
C2—C31.403 (4)
N2—N1—C1112.1 (2)C4—C3—H3121.6
N2—N1—Cl120.4 (2)C2—C3—H3121.6
C1—N1—Cl127.46 (18)C3—C4—C5121.6 (3)
N3—N2—N1107.3 (2)C3—C4—H4119.2
N2—N3—C2108.7 (2)C5—C4—H4119.2
N1—C1—C2102.8 (2)C6—C5—C4123.0 (3)
N1—C1—C6133.5 (3)C6—C5—H5118.5
C2—C1—C6123.7 (3)C4—C5—H5118.5
N3—C2—C1109.1 (3)C5—C6—C1114.9 (3)
N3—C2—C3131.0 (3)C5—C6—H6122.5
C1—C2—C3120.0 (3)C1—C6—H6122.5
C4—C3—C2116.8 (3)
  8 in total

1.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of some novel thiazole substituted benzotriazole derivatives.

Authors:  Nitin D Gaikwad; Sachin V Patil; Vivek D Bobade
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Conventional and microwave assisted synthesis of 2-oxo-4-substituted aryl-azetidine derivatives of benzotriazole: a new class of biological compounds.

Authors:  Adesh Dubey; S K Srivastava; S D Srivastava
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Inexpensive, one-pot synthesis of unsymmetrical disulfides using 1-chlorobenzotriazole.

Authors:  Roger Hunter; Mino Caira; Nashia Stellenboom
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  (1H-1,2,3-Benzotriazol-1-yl)methyl benzoate.

Authors:  Ting Guo; Gang Cao; Sen Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-04-18

6.  1-Benz-yloxy-1H-benzotriazole.

Authors:  Samuel Robinson Jebas; P Selvarathy Grace; B Ravindran Durai Nayagam; Dieter Schollmeyer
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-06-30

7.  (1H-1,2,3-Benzotriazol-1-yl)methyl 2,2-dimethyl-propano-ate.

Authors:  Sen Xu; Yingzhong Shen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  1-Benzyl-1H-benzotriazole.

Authors:  P Selvarathy Grace; Samuel Robinson Jebas; B Ravindran Durai Nayagam; Dieter Schollmeyer
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-21
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Likelihood of atom-atom contacts in crystal structures of halogenated organic compounds.

Authors:  Christian Jelsch; Sarra Soudani; Cherif Ben Nasr
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.769

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.