OBJECTIVE: To evaluate parenting stress following infants' cataract extraction surgery, and to determine if levels of stress differ between 2 treatments for unilateral congenital cataract in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: At surgery, an intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted or children were left aphakic, treated with contact lens (CL). Stress measures were administered 3 months after surgery and at the first visit after the visual acuity (VA) assessment done at 12 months of age. RESULTS: Caregivers in the IOL group reported higher levels of stress than those in the CL group 3 months after surgery, but there were no group differences in stress scores at the post-VA assessment. Stress scores did not change differentially for participants assigned to IOL versus CL treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment assignment did not have a significant impact on caregiver stress during infancy or on the change in stress during the child's first 2 years of life.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate parenting stress following infants' cataract extraction surgery, and to determine if levels of stress differ between 2 treatments for unilateral congenital cataract in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: At surgery, an intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted or children were left aphakic, treated with contact lens (CL). Stress measures were administered 3 months after surgery and at the first visit after the visual acuity (VA) assessment done at 12 months of age. RESULTS: Caregivers in the IOL group reported higher levels of stress than those in the CL group 3 months after surgery, but there were no group differences in stress scores at the post-VA assessment. Stress scores did not change differentially for participants assigned to IOL versus CL treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment assignment did not have a significant impact on caregiver stress during infancy or on the change in stress during the child's first 2 years of life.
Authors: D Pelchat; N Ricard; J M Bouchard; M Perreault; J F Saucier; M Berthiaume; J Bisson Journal: Child Care Health Dev Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 2.508
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Samara Strauber; Graham E Quinn; Stephen R Cole; Joost Felius; Marjean Kulp Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Scott R Lambert; Michael J Lynn; E Eugenie Hartmann; Lindreth DuBois; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Sharon F Freedman; David A Plager; Edward G Buckley; M Edward Wilson Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Stacey J Kruger; Lindreth DuBois; Edmund R Becker; David Morrison; Lorri Wilson; M Edward Wilson; Scott R Lambert Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Suzanne M Wernimont; Yolanda S Castañeda; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Laura Liebermann; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: J E Self; R Taylor; A L Solebo; S Biswas; M Parulekar; A Dev Borman; J Ashworth; R McClenaghan; J Abbott; E O'Flynn; D Hildebrand; I C Lloyd Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 3.775