Literature DB >> 23475352

Groupwise conditional random forests for automatic shape classification and contour quality assessment in radiotherapy planning.

Chris McIntosh1, Igor Svistoun, Thomas G Purdie.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy is used to treat cancer patients around the world. High quality treatment plans maximally radiate the targets while minimally radiating healthy organs at risk. In order to judge plan quality and safety, segmentations of the targets and organs at risk are created, and the amount of radiation that will be delivered to each structure is estimated prior to treatment. If the targets or organs at risk are mislabelled, or the segmentations are of poor quality, the safety of the radiation doses will be erroneously reviewed and an unsafe plan could proceed. We propose a technique to automatically label groups of segmentations of different structures from a radiation therapy plan for the joint purposes of providing quality assurance and data mining. Given one or more segmentations and an associated image we seek to assign medically meaningful labels to each segmentation and report the confidence of that label. Our method uses random forests to learn joint distributions over the training features, and then exploits a set of learned potential group configurations to build a conditional random field (CRF) that ensures the assignment of labels is consistent across the group of segmentations. The CRF is then solved via a constrained assignment problem. We validate our method on 1574 plans, consisting of 17[Formula: see text] 579 segmentations, demonstrating an overall classification accuracy of 91.58%. Our results also demonstrate the stability of RF with respect to tree depth and the number of splitting variables in large data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23475352     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2251421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  14 in total

Review 1.  Automated Radiation Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Dong Joo Rhee; Anuja Jhingran; Kelly Kisling; Carlos Cardenas; Hannah Simonds; Laurence Court
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Prediction of standard-dose brain PET image by using MRI and low-dose brain [18F]FDG PET images.

Authors:  Jiayin Kang; Yaozong Gao; Feng Shi; David S Lalush; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275.

Authors:  Eric Ford; Leigh Conroy; Lei Dong; Luis Fong de Los Santos; Anne Greener; Grace Gwe-Ya Kim; Jennifer Johnson; Perry Johnson; James G Mechalakos; Brian Napolitano; Stephanie Parker; Deborah Schofield; Koren Smith; Ellen Yorke; Michelle Wells
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment.

Authors:  Prema Rassiah; Fan-Chi Frances Su; Y Jessica Huang; Dan Spitznagel; Vikren Sarkar; Martin W Szegedi; Hui Zhao; Adam B Paxton; Geoff Nelson; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Daniel Jarrett; Eleanor Stride; Katherine Vallis; Mark J Gooding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.629

6.  Computer automation for physics chart check should be adopted in clinic to replace manual chart checking for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Edward L Clouser; Quan Chen; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Toward automation of initial chart check for photon/electron EBRT: the clinical implementation of new AAPM task group reports and automation techniques.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; Baoshe Zhang; Mariana Guerrero; Sung-Woo Lee; Narottam Lamichhane; Shifeng Chen; Byongyong Yi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Deep learning-based classification and structure name standardization for organ at risk and target delineations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Michael Lempart; Johan Swärd; Emilia Persson; Tufve Nyholm; Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson; Jonas Scherman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Automatic detection of contouring errors using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Dong Joo Rhee; Carlos E Cardenas; Hesham Elhalawani; Rachel McCarroll; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Adam S Garden; Christine B Peterson; Beth M Beadle; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Automatic contouring system for cervical cancer using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Dong Joo Rhee; Anuja Jhingran; Bastien Rigaud; Tucker Netherton; Carlos E Cardenas; Lifei Zhang; Sastry Vedam; Stephen Kry; Kristy K Brock; William Shaw; Frederika O'Reilly; Jeannette Parkes; Hester Burger; Nazia Fakie; Chris Trauernicht; Hannah Simonds; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.