PURPOSE: Sorafenib and everolimus are both active against neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Because of potential synergy between VEGF pathway and mTOR inhibitors, we performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining sorafenib and everolimus in patients with advanced NET. METHODS: Patients were treated with everolimus 10 mg daily in combination with sorafenib (dose level 1: 200 mg twice daily; dose level 2: 200 mg per morning, 400 mg per evening) using standard phase I dose escalation design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined within the first cycle (28 days) of therapy. Treatment was continued until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Twelve additional patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level to further characterize safety and a preliminary assessment of activity. RESULTS: One patient in Cohort 1 experienced DLT (grade 3 skin rash); the cohort was expanded to 6 patients with no further DLTs. All 3 patients in Cohort 2 experienced DLT, consisting of thrombocytopenia, hand-foot skin reaction, and rash/allergic reaction. Sorafenib 200 mg twice daily in combination with everolimus 10 mg daily was established as the MTD. Independently reviewed best objective responses revealed that 62 % of patients had some degree of tumor shrinkage. By RECIST, we observed partial response in 1 patient, stable disease in 13 patients, and progressive disease in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib 200 mg twice daily with everolimus 10 mg daily represents the MTD of this combination in patients with advanced NET. While the combination is active, toxicity concerns may preclude more widespread use.
PURPOSE:Sorafenib and everolimus are both active against neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Because of potential synergy between VEGF pathway and mTOR inhibitors, we performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining sorafenib and everolimus in patients with advanced NET. METHODS:Patients were treated with everolimus 10 mg daily in combination with sorafenib (dose level 1: 200 mg twice daily; dose level 2: 200 mg per morning, 400 mg per evening) using standard phase I dose escalation design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined within the first cycle (28 days) of therapy. Treatment was continued until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Twelve additional patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level to further characterize safety and a preliminary assessment of activity. RESULTS: One patient in Cohort 1 experienced DLT (grade 3 skin rash); the cohort was expanded to 6 patients with no further DLTs. All 3 patients in Cohort 2 experienced DLT, consisting of thrombocytopenia, hand-foot skin reaction, and rash/allergic reaction. Sorafenib 200 mg twice daily in combination with everolimus 10 mg daily was established as the MTD. Independently reviewed best objective responses revealed that 62 % of patients had some degree of tumor shrinkage. By RECIST, we observed partial response in 1 patient, stable disease in 13 patients, and progressive disease in 3 patients. CONCLUSION:Sorafenib 200 mg twice daily with everolimus 10 mg daily represents the MTD of this combination in patients with advanced NET. While the combination is active, toxicity concerns may preclude more widespread use.
Authors: Marie-Louise H Fjällskog; Margareta H Lejonklou; Kjell E Oberg; Barbro K Eriksson; Eva T Janson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea L Harzstark; Eric J Small; Vivian K Weinberg; Janine Sun; Charles J Ryan; Amy M Lin; Lawrence Fong; Dion R Brocks; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manisha H Shah; Tetsuhide Ito; Catherine Lombard Bohas; Edward M Wolin; Eric Van Cutsem; Timothy J Hobday; Takuji Okusaka; Jaume Capdevila; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Paola Tomassetti; Marianne E Pavel; Sakina Hoosen; Tomas Haas; Jeremie Lincy; David Lebwohl; Kjell Öberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ana M Molina; Darren R Feldman; Martin H Voss; Michelle S Ginsberg; Michael S Baum; Dion R Brocks; Patricia M Fischer; Michael J Trinos; Sujata Patil; Robert J Motzer Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Donna E Hansel; Ayman Rahman; John Hermans; Ronald R de Krijger; Raheela Ashfaq; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Anirban Maitra Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Kanika A Bowen; Scott R Silva; Jessica N Johnson; Hung Q Doan; Lindsey N Jackson; Pat Gulhati; Suimin Qiu; Taylor S Riall; B Mark Evers Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Alexandria T Phan; Daniel M Halperin; Jennifer A Chan; David R Fogelman; Kenneth R Hess; Paige Malinowski; Eileen Regan; Chaan S Ng; James C Yao; Matthew H Kulke Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 41.316