PURPOSE: Combining agents that block both the VEGF and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways may be synergistic. We explored a novel dosing schedule to assess safety, toxicity and activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled in a modified 3 + 3 Phase I dose escalation study to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a combination of everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) and pazopanib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-VEGF activity). An expansion cohort selected for patients with molecular alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled; median age was 60 years; 29 were women. The MTD was pazopanib 600 mg every other day (QOD) alternating with everolimus 10 mg PO QOD. DLTs were grade 3 thrombocytopenia and creatinine elevation. Most common toxicities of any grade were thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, leukopenia/neutropenia and lipid abnormalities. Among 52 patients evaluable for response, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 27 % (14/52) including four partial responses (PR), and 10 stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. 26 of 45 patients evaluated for molecular alterations had at least one alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. CBR in patients with a matched alteration was 27 % (7/26) versus 26 % (5/19) for patients without an alteration (p = 0.764). However, 64% of those with CBR and molecular testing done for alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were positive. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with pazopanib and everolimus was well tolerated and demonstrated activity in solid tumors. Further exploration of this combination and molecular correlation with treatment outcomes is warranted.
PURPOSE: Combining agents that block both the VEGF and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways may be synergistic. We explored a novel dosing schedule to assess safety, toxicity and activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled in a modified 3 + 3 Phase I dose escalation study to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a combination of everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) and pazopanib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-VEGF activity). An expansion cohort selected for patients with molecular alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled; median age was 60 years; 29 were women. The MTD was pazopanib 600 mg every other day (QOD) alternating with everolimus 10 mg PO QOD. DLTs were grade 3 thrombocytopenia and creatinine elevation. Most common toxicities of any grade were thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, leukopenia/neutropenia and lipid abnormalities. Among 52 patients evaluable for response, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 27 % (14/52) including four partial responses (PR), and 10 stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. 26 of 45 patients evaluated for molecular alterations had at least one alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. CBR in patients with a matched alteration was 27 % (7/26) versus 26 % (5/19) for patients without an alteration (p = 0.764). However, 64% of those with CBR and molecular testing done for alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were positive. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with pazopanib and everolimus was well tolerated and demonstrated activity in solid tumors. Further exploration of this combination and molecular correlation with treatment outcomes is warranted.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hong Seok Park; Sung Kyu Hong; Mi Mi Oh; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seong Jin Jeong; Seok Soo Byun; Jun Cheon; Sang Eun Lee; Du Geon Moon Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Kathy D Miller; Linnea I Chap; Frankie A Holmes; Melody A Cobleigh; P Kelly Marcom; Louis Fehrenbacher; Maura Dickler; Beth A Overmoyer; James D Reimann; Amy P Sing; Virginia Langmuir; Hope S Rugo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amit M Oza; Laurie Elit; Ming-Sound Tsao; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jim Biagi; Diane Michele Provencher; Walter H Gotlieb; Paul J Hoskins; Prafull Ghatage; Katia S Tonkin; Helen J Mackay; John Mazurka; Joana Sederias; Percy Ivy; Janet E Dancey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A V Tinker; S Ellard; S Welch; F Moens; G Allo; M S Tsao; J Squire; D Tu; E A Eisenhauer; H MacKay Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Alexander E Yueh; Susan N Payne; Alyssa A Leystra; Dana R Van De Hey; Tyler M Foley; Cheri A Pasch; Linda Clipson; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Dustin A Deming Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Won Ki Kang; Ho Yeong Lim Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Vikas Dembla; Roman Groisberg; Ken Hess; Siqing Fu; Jennifer Wheler; David S Hong; Filip Janku; Ralph Zinner; Sarina Anne Piha-Paul; Vinod Ravi; Robert S Benjamin; Shreyaskumar Patel; Neeta Somaiah; Cynthia E Herzog; Daniel D Karp; Jason Roszik; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Vivek Subbiah Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Guan Qun Zhu; Seung Hwan Jeon; Woong Jin Bae; Sae Woong Choi; Hyun Cheol Jeong; Kang Sup Kim; Su Jin Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho; U Syn Ha; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Eun Bi Kwon; Sae Woong Kim Journal: Stem Cells Int Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 5.443