Literature DB >> 23474300

An internationally standardised antisaccade protocol.

Chrystalina Antoniades1, Ulrich Ettinger, Bertrand Gaymard, Iain Gilchrist, Arni Kristjánsson, Christopher Kennard, R John Leigh, Imran Noorani, Pierre Pouget, Nikolaos Smyrnis, Adam Tarnowski, David S Zee, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Detailed measurements of saccadic latency--the time taken to make an eye movement to a suddenly-presented visual target--have proved a valuable source of detailed and quantitative information in a wide range of neurological conditions, as well as shedding light on the mechanisms of decision, currently of intense interest to cognitive neuroscientists. However, there is no doubt that more complex oculomotor tasks, and in particular the antisaccade task in which a participant must make a saccade in the opposite direction to the target, are potentially more sensitive indicators of neurological dysfunction, particularly in neurodegenerative conditions. But two obstacles currently hinder their widespread adoption for this purpose. First, that much of the potential information from antisaccade experiments, notably about latency distribution and amplitude, is typically thrown away. Second, that there is no standardised protocol for carrying out antisaccade experiments, so that results from one laboratory cannot easily be compared with those from another. This paper, the outcome of a recent international meeting of oculomotor scientists and clinicians with an unusually wide experience of such measurements, sets out a proposed protocol for clinical antisaccade trials: its adoption will greatly enhance the clinical and scientific benefits of making these kinds of measurements.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474300     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  52 in total

1.  Ultrafast initiation of a neural race by impending errors.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice.

Authors:  W Ilg; M Branscheidt; A Butala; P Celnik; L de Paola; F B Horak; L Schöls; H A G Teive; A P Vogel; D S Zee; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Behavioural and computational varieties of response inhibition in eye movements.

Authors:  Vassilis Cutsuridis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A Trial-by-Trial Window into Sensorimotor Transformations in the Human Motor Periphery.

Authors:  Chao Gu; Daniel K Wood; Paul L Gribble; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of a food-specific inhibition training in individuals with binge eating disorder-findings from a randomized controlled proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Katrin Elisabeth Giel; Eva Speer; Kathrin Schag; Elisabeth Johanna Leehr; Stephan Zipfel
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Jay A Edelman; Bjarki Dalsgaard Sigurþórsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Eye Movement Research in the Twenty-First Century-a Window to the Brain, Mind, and More.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; David S Zee
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Adolescents with Persistent History of Maltreatment Fail in Antisaccadic Task.

Authors:  Jiri Jost; Helena Havlisova; Zuzana Bilkova; Zuzana Stefankova; Ludmila Zemkova
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2017-09-30

9.  Alpha Oscillations Modulate Preparatory Activity in Marmoset Area 8Ad.

Authors:  Kevin Johnston; Liya Ma; Lauren Schaeffer; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function.

Authors:  Chrystalina A Antoniades; James J FitzGerald
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.