Literature DB >> 23474077

Exploration of the mechanisms underlying the ISPC effect: evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging data.

Julien Grandjean1, Kevin D'Ostilio, Wim Fias, Christophe Phillips, Evelyne Balteau, Christian Degueldre, André Luxen, Pierre Maquet, Eric Salmon, Fabienne Collette.   

Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruent (ISPC) effect in a Stroop task - the observation of reduced interference for color words mostly presented in an incongruent color - has attracted growing interest since the original study by Jacoby, Lindsay, and Hessels [(2003) Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638-644]. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effect: associative learning of contingencies and item-specific control through word reading modulation. Both interpretations have received empirical support from behavioral data. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the responsible mechanisms of the ISPC effect with the classic two-item sets design using fMRI. Results showed that the ISPC effect is associated with increased activity in the anterior cingulate (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), and inferior and superior parietal cortex. Importantly, behavioral and fMRI analyses specifically addressing the respective contribution of associative learning and item-specific control mechanisms brought support for the contingency learning account of the ISPC effect. Results are discussed in reference to task and procedure characteristics that may influence the extent to which item-specific control and/or contingency learning contribute to the ISPC effect.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474077     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tiansheng Xia; Hui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal and spectral dynamics underlying cognitive control modulated by task-irrelevant stimulus-response learning.

Authors:  Yanan Cao; Xiangyi Cao; Zhenzhu Yue; Ling Wang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Mueller; Claudia R Eickhoff; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Sophie Tan; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Spatio-temporal patterns of cognitive control revealed with simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thomas Hinault; Kevin Larcher; Natalja Zazubovits; Jean Gotman; Alain Dagher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Large-scale reconfiguration of connectivity patterns among attentional networks during context-dependent adjustment of cognitive control.

Authors:  Yilu Li; Yanqing Wang; Fangwen Yu; Antao Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Contingencies and attentional capture: the importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

10.  Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.