Literature DB >> 23473011

Early single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients.

Harald C Eichstaedt1, Jerry Easo1, Tobias Härle2, Otto E Dapunt3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sutureless self-expanding nitinol stent-frame aortic valve prostheses made of equine pericardium implanted in patients with symptomatic aortic valve disease.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 120 patients (mean age, 76.7 ± 5.9 years) who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or in combination with other cardiovascular procedures. Preoperatively, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was determined. Transthoracic echocardiography and clinical outcome evaluation were performed at the time of discharge and at 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 71 of 120 patients underwent isolated sutureless aortic valve replacement (mean aortic crossclamp time, 37 ± 11 minutes; mean bypass time, 62 ± 18 minutes). Coronary bypass grafting was performed in 30 patients. Overall mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 14.8% ± 10%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 6.7% overall and 1.4% in stand-alone procedures. During a mean follow-up of 313 days, 3 more deaths occurred. The reoperation rate was 4.2%. Mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients were 9 mm Hg (4-13 mm Hg) and 14 mm Hg (8-22 mm Hg) at discharge, respectively. In 8 patients (6.7%), permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary. No thromboembolic events or bleedings related to the bioprosthesis were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large single-center experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement, the surgical procedure is shown to be safe and time-saving. In view of the excellent hemodynamic results and shortening of aortic crossclamp and bypass times, we notice advantages especially in high-risk patients. Minimally invasive access seems to be facilitated. The long-term durability of this prosthesis has yet to be determined.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  35; AVR; TEE; aortic valve replacement; transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473011     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.12.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  11 in total

Review 1.  Medtronic 3f Enable implantation through right anterior thoracotomy.

Authors:  Andreas Vötsch; Otto Dapunt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

3.  Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation and bicuspid valve anatomy: an unsolved dilemma?

Authors:  Marco Vola; Jean-Baptiste Guichard; Salvatore Campisi; Jean-François Fuzellier; Antoine Gerbay; Fabien Doguet; Karl Isaaz; Kasra Azarnoush; Amedeo Anselmi; Vito Giovani Ruggieri
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Yi-Chin Tsai; Natasha Niles; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options.

Authors:  Basel Ramlawi; Kareem Bedeir; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

6.  Sutureless versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes in 70 High-Risk Patients Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Procedures.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; Mehmet Ali Yuruk; Ali Ihsan Parlar; Ugur Ziyrek; Ali Kemal Arslan; Ufuk Sayar; Ilker Mataraci
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

Authors:  Ferdinand Vogt; Steffen Pfeiffer; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Theodor Fischlein; Giuseppe Santarpino
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-27

8.  Initial experience with the Perceval S sutureless aortic valve.

Authors:  Tatjana Raickovic; Igor Zivkovic; Tatjana Ragus; Slobodan Tomic; Petar Vukovic; Dusko Nezic; Miodrag Peric; Slobodan Micovic
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2020-04-08

9.  Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; İlker Mataracı; Mehmet Ali Yürük; Tanıl Özer; Ufuk Sayar; Ali Kemal Arslan; Uğur Ziyrek; Murat Yücel
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-05

10.  Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Stephen Clark; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.