Literature DB >> 23473002

The accuracy of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy versus conventional endoscopic biopsies for the diagnosis of superficial gastric neoplasia (with videos).

Gene Hyun Bok1, Seong Ran Jeon, Joo Young Cho, Jun-Hyung Cho, Woong Cheul Lee, So Young Jin, In Ho Choi, Hyun Gun Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Eui Ju Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) allows real-time in vivo histologic evaluation of GI mucosal lesions. Although pCLE has been used for various GI disorders, the significance of pCLE for gastric lesions is largely unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the accuracy of conventional endoscopic forceps biopsy and pCLE for the diagnosis of superficial gastric neoplasia before endoscopic resection.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative study.
SETTING: Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: This study involved 54 superficial gastric neoplasias in 46 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Accuracy of in vivo and offline pCLE diagnosis and interobserver agreement.
METHODS: pCLE was performed before endoscopic resection of superficial gastric neoplasias previously diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. The overall accuracy of endoscopic, in vivo pCLE, and offline pCLE diagnosis was compared with postendoscopic resection histopathology.
RESULTS: Endoscopic resection was performed on 54 lesions. On final histopathology, there were 3 non-neoplastic lesions, 19 gastric dysplasias, 22 differentiated adenocarcinomas, and 10 undifferentiated adenocarcinomas. The overall agreement with the final histopathology was substantial for conventional biopsies (κ = 0.617) and excellent for in vivo pCLE (κ = 0.824) (P < .001). The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was 91.7% for pCLE and 85.2% for conventional biopsies (P = .065). The combined accuracy of conventional endoscopic biopsies and pCLE was 98.1%. The interobserver agreement for offline pCLE diagnosis was excellent (κ = 0.931). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study, small sample size.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that pCLE can provide an accurate diagnosis for superficial gastric neoplasia. pCLE has the potential to compensate for the inherent limitations of a conventional endoscopic biopsy.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473002     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  23 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: current status and new approaches.

Authors:  Weon Jin Ko; Ga Won Song; Won Hee Kim; Sung Pyo Hong; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 2.  Past and current trends in endoscopic diagnosis for early stage gastric cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuki Sumiyama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Size discrepancy between endoscopic size and pathologic size is not negligible in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Mi Kyung Song; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyun Soo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Ever-changing endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer: yesterday-today-tomorrow.

Authors:  Mi-Young Kim; Jun-Hyung Cho; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Feasibility of real-time intestinal bloodstream evaluation using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in a porcine intestinal ischemia model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Rie Nakatsuka; Hisashi Hara; Shigeyoshi Higashi; Kouji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Perioperative characterization of anastomotic doughnuts with high-resolution probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in colorectal cancer surgery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma; Gaetano Luglio; Stefania Staibano; Luigi Bucci; Dario Esposito; Francesco Maione; Massimo Mascolo; Gennaro Ilardi; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer: focusing on histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy-based and endoscopic resection specimen-based diagnosis.

Authors:  Byung-Hoon Min; Ki Joo Kang; Jun Haeng Lee; Eun Ran Kim; Yang Won Min; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  A novel approach of optical biopsy using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  Hisashi Hara; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Rie Nakatsuka; Shigeyoshi Higashi; Tetsuji Naka; Kazuki Sumiyama; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Confocal microscopy in the esophagus and stomach.

Authors:  Adam Templeton; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.