Literature DB >> 23472721

Taiwan aneurysm registry: multivariate analysis of two-month, one-year, and two-year outcomes after endovascular and microsurgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms.

H-M Liu1, H-F Wong, K-W Lee, Y-K Tu, Y-S Yeh, C-W Chou, Y-H Wang, Y-L Chen, Y-L Lo, T-C Hsieh, Y-C Wang, T-K Lin, D-M Lai, W-L Chen, H-M Tseng, C-W Li.   

Abstract

We compared the outcomes of endovascular coiling with microsurgical clipping of aneurysms in a Taiwanese population. In an ambi-directional cohort design, patient baseline characteristics and clinical course after treatment for ruptured subarachnoid aneurysm were abstracted from medical records from three hospitals to examine and compare differences in post-operative outcomes between those treated with endovascular coiling and those treated with microsurgical clipping. Outcomes were measured, using the modified Rankin scale, two months, one year and two years postoperatively. Of the 642 patients enrolled in the study, 281 underwent endovascular treatment and 361 underwent neurosurgery. The demographics and baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable except for a larger maximum target aneurysm lumen size (p=0.02) in the endovascular group. Patients who underwent the endovascular procedure tended to have a better quality of life than those who had neurosurgery (p<0.01). When the severity of symptom data was pooled into two groups (Rankin values 0-2 and 3-6) a statistically significant relationship was found between the severity of symptoms and age, Hunt and Hess grade, number of target aneurysms detected, and log of maximum target aneurysm lumen size (all p≤0.01). After controlling for potential confounding factors and using the lumped Rankin outcome data, no significant difference in outcome was found between the two procedures at either time point. Our study indicated that endovascular coiling achieves results comparable to surgical clipping for patients with ruptured subarachnoid aneurysms in a Taiwanese population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23472721      PMCID: PMC3601615          DOI: 10.1177/159101991301900105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  11 in total

1.  ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping?

Authors:  James I Ausman
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2003-03

2.  Coils or clips in subarachnoid haemorrhage?

Authors:  Douglas A Nichols; Robert D Brown; Fredric B Meyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The ISAT trial.

Authors:  Clarence H S Leung; W S Poon; L M Yu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  ISAT trial: coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysms?

Authors:  Gavin W Britz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Andrew Molyneux; Richard Kerr; Irene Stratton; Peter Sandercock; Mike Clarke; Julia Shrimpton; Rury Holman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged 65 years and older: follow-up of 52 patients after 1 year.

Authors:  J Sedat; M Dib; M Lonjon; S Litrico; D Von Langsdorf; D Fontaine; P Paquis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Management outcomes for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in the elderly.

Authors:  R Y Chung; B S Carter; A Norbash; R Budzik; C Putnam; C S Ogilvy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Chao Peng; Yu-Hang Diao; Shi-Fei Cai; Xin-Yu Yang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2022-07-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.