Literature DB >> 12411651

Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged 65 years and older: follow-up of 52 patients after 1 year.

J Sedat1, M Dib, M Lonjon, S Litrico, D Von Langsdorf, D Fontaine, P Paquis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We sought to describe the clinical outcome and results obtained in the endovascular therapy of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the elderly over an 8-year period. We compared endovascular therapy results in patients aged > or =65 and <65 years.
METHODS: During 1993-1999, 52 patients aged 65 to 85 years (mean age, 71.5+/-4.7 years) were embolized with the use of Guglielmi detachable coils (group I). During the same period, 143 patients aged <65 years (mean age, 47+/-11 years) with ruptured cerebral aneurysm were treated with the same technique (group II). A clinical assessment was made on admission with the Hunt and Hess (HH) classification and again in the 12th month with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), with arteriographic control in months 3 and 12.
RESULTS: In group I, clinical grades on admission were as follows: HH 1, 9.5%; HH 2, 33%; HH 3, 21%; HH 4, 34.5%; HH 5, 2%. Outcome was favorable in 48% of patients (GOS 1 or 2); the mortality rate was 23%. No rebleeding was observed. Patients presenting lesions > or =10 mm had an unfavorable outcome in >77% of cases. Thromboembolic complications were present in 13% of cases. In group II, clinical grades on admission were as follows: HH 1, 14.5%; HH 2, 47%; HH 3, 11%; HH 4, 24%; HH 5, 3.5%. Favorable outcome (GOS 1 or 2) was observed in 77% of cases, with 14% mortality. Complications due to the endovascular procedure were present in 4.2% of cases. Patients with HH grades 1 or 2 on admission showed a positive outcome (GOS 1 or 2) in 77% of cases in group I and in 88.5% of cases in group II. Mortality was 9% in the first subgroup compared with 2.8% in the second. Patients who had a high clinical grade on admission (HH 4 or 5) showed a favorable outcome (GOS 1 or 2) in 16% of cases in group I compared with 41% in group II.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged > or =65 years appears to be effective against rebleeding and represents an alternative to surgery. However, perioperative thromboembolic complications are more frequent in the elderly population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12411651     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000034788.70971.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  20 in total

1.  Subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients > or = 75 years: clinical course, treatment and outcome.

Authors:  D J Nieuwkamp; G J E Rinkel; R Silva; P Greebe; D A Schokking; J M Ferro
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the elderly: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Jacques Sedat; Mustapha Dib; David Rasendrarijao; Denys Fontaine; Michel Lonjon; Philippe Paquis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Therapeutic advances in interventional neurology.

Authors:  Jawad F Kirmani; Nazli Janjua; Ammar Al Kawi; Shafiuddin Ahmed; Ismail Khatri; Ali Ebrahimi; Afshin A Divani; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

4.  Angiographic follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: an analysis of 162 cases with 173 aneurysms.

Authors:  M-H Li; B-L Gao; C Fang; B-X Gu; Y-S Cheng; W Wang; G Scotti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms in elderly patients.

Authors:  G B Bradac; M Bergui; M Fontanella
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Endovascular management for intracranial ruptured aneurysms in elderly patients: outcome and technical aspects.

Authors:  F Mont'alverne; M Musacchio; V Tolentino; C Riquelme; A Tournade
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Is eptifibatide a safe and effective rescue therapy in thromboembolic events complicating cerebral aneurysm coil embolization? Single-center experience in 42 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacques Sedat; Yves Chau; Lydiane Mondot; Richard Chemla; Michel Lonjon; Bernard Padovani
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Taiwan aneurysm registry: multivariate analysis of two-month, one-year, and two-year outcomes after endovascular and microsurgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  H-M Liu; H-F Wong; K-W Lee; Y-K Tu; Y-S Yeh; C-W Chou; Y-H Wang; Y-L Chen; Y-L Lo; T-C Hsieh; Y-C Wang; T-K Lin; D-M Lai; W-L Chen; H-M Tseng; C-W Li
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Clinical outcome after endovascular coil embolization in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  M Johansson; O Norbäck; G Gál; K G Cesarini; M Tovi; S Solander; C F Contant; E Ronne-Engström; P Enblad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in elderly people.

Authors:  Boris Lubicz; Xavier Leclerc; Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Jean-Paul Lejeune; Jean-Pierre Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.