| Literature DB >> 23472184 |
Stefanie Malan-Müller1, Sîan Megan Joanna Hemmings, Georgina Spies, Martin Kidd, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Soraya Seedat.
Abstract
The neuropathogenesis of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may manifest as various neurocognitive impairments (NCI). HIV-positive individuals also have significantly shorter telomere length (TL) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and CD8+ T cells compared to HIV-negative individuals. Additionally, reduced TL has been found to be associated with chronic psychological stress. This study focused on the effects of HIV-infection and chronic stress associated with childhood trauma on telomere length, and investigated whether leukocyte TL (LTL), in particular, represents a risk factor for NCI. Eighty-three HIV-positive and 45 HIV-negative women were assessed for childhood trauma and were subjected to detailed neurocognitive testing. Blood from each participant was used to extract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Relative LTL were determined by performing real time quantitative PCR reactions as described by Cawthon et al. (2002). As expected, relative LTL in the HIV-positive individuals was significantly shorter than that of HIV-negative individuals (F = 51.56, p = <0.01). Notably, a significant positive correlation was evident between relative LTL and learning performance in the HIV-positive group. In addition, a significant negative correlation was observed between relative LTL and verbal fluency, but this association was only evident in HIV-positive individuals who had experienced trauma. Our results suggest that reduced LTL is associated with worse learning performance in HIV-positive individuals, indicating that TL could act as a susceptibility factor in increasing neurocognitive decline in HIV-infected individuals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23472184 PMCID: PMC3589394 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Group characteristics for HIV status, childhood trauma status, mean relative LTL and LTL standard deviation (SD) values for all participants.
| Effect | Level of factor | Level of factor | N | % | LTL Mean (SD) |
|
| 128 | 0.74 (0.32) | |||
|
| HIV-negative | 45 | 35.16 | 0.98 (0.36) | |
|
| HIV-positive | 83 | 64.84 | 0.61 (0.2) | |
|
| No | 62 | 48.44 | 0.78 (0.36) | |
|
| Yes | 66 | 51.56 | 0.7 (0.28) | |
|
| HIV-negative | No | 27 | 21.09 | 1.02 (0.38) |
|
| HIV-negative | Yes | 18 | 14.06 | 0.92 (0.35) |
|
| HIV-positive | No | 35 | 27.34 | 0.59 (0.19) |
|
| HIV-positive | Yes | 48 | 37.5 | 0.62 (0.2) |
All LTL values are that of relative LTL and not absolute LTL. HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus), LTL (leukocyte telomere length), N (samples size), SD (standard deviation).
Socio-demographic information of all participants.
| Frequency | |
|
| |
| Left | 9 (7%) |
| Right | 119 (92%) |
|
| |
| Mean | 29.8 |
| Mean of HIV-positive participants | 31.6 |
| Mean of HIV-negative participants | 26.33 |
| Minimum | 18 |
| Maximum | 50 |
|
| |
| Black | 123 (95%) |
| Coloured | 5 (4%) |
|
| |
| Single | 91 (70%) |
| Married | 26 (20%) |
| Living with a partner | 3 (2%) |
| Separated | 4 (3%) |
| Divorced | 3 (2%) |
| Widowed | 1 (1%) |
|
| |
| English | 4 (3%) |
| Afrikaans | 16 (5%) |
| Xhosa | 113 (88%) |
| Other | 5 (4%) |
|
| |
| Less than R10 000 | 101 (78%) |
| R10 000 - R20 000 | 21 (16%) |
| R20 000 - R40 000 | 1 (1%) |
| R40 000 - R60 000 | 2 (2%) |
| R60 000 - R100 000 | 1 (1%) |
| More than R100 000 | 2 (2%) |
|
| |
| Grade 7 | 1 (1%) |
| Grade 8 | 7 (5%) |
| Grade 9 | 12 (9%) |
| Grade 10 | 24 (19%) |
| Grade 11 | 49 (38%) |
| Grade 12 | 31 (24%) |
|
| |
| Employed | 46 (36%) |
| Unemployed | 82 (64%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 13 (16%) |
| No | 70 (84%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Left | 9 (7%) |
| Right | 119 (92%) |
|
| |
| Mean | 29.8 |
| Mean of HIV-positive participants | 31.6 |
| Mean of HIV-negative participants | 26.33 |
| Minimum | 18 |
| Maximum | 50 |
|
| |
| Black | 123 (95%) |
| Coloured | 5 (4%) |
|
| |
| Single | 91 (70%) |
| Married | 26 (20%) |
| Living with a partner | 3 (2%) |
| Separated | 4 (3%) |
| Divorced | 3 (2%) |
| Widowed | 1 (1%) |
|
| |
| English | 4 (3%) |
| Afrikaans | 16 (5%) |
| Xhosa | 113 (88%) |
| Other | 5 (4%) |
|
| |
| Less than R10 000 | 101 (78%) |
| R10 000–R20 000 | 21 (16%) |
| R20 000–R40 000 | 1 (1%) |
| R40 000–R60 000 | 2 (2%) |
| R60 000–R100 000 | 1 (1%) |
| More than R100 000 | 2 (2%) |
|
| |
| Grade 7 | 1 (1%) |
| Grade 8 | 7 (5%) |
| Grade 9 | 12 (9%) |
| Grade 10 | 24 (19%) |
| Grade 11 | 49 (38%) |
| Grade 12 | 31 (24%) |
|
| |
| Employed | 46 (36%) |
| Unemployed | 82 (64%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 13 (16%) |
| No | 70 (84%) |
Ability domains that were used to measure cognition in the International Neuropsychological Test Battery.
| Neuropsychological domain | Neuropsychological test |
|
| |
| WAIS-III Digit Symbol | |
| WAIS-III Symbol Search | |
| Trail Making Test Part A | |
|
| |
| Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test | |
| WMS-III Spatial Span | |
|
| |
| Wisconsin Card Sorting Test - computer version | |
| Color Trails 1 and 2 | |
| Stroop Color Word Test | |
| Halstead Category Test – computer version | |
|
| |
| Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Revised | |
| Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, Revised | |
|
| |
| Controlled Oral Word Association Test (FAS) | |
| Category Fluency (Animals, Action) | |
|
| |
| Grooved Pegboard Test (both hands) | |
|
| |
| Hiscock Digit Memory Test |
Figure 1Graph displaying the group characteristics for HIV status, childhood trauma status and mean relative LTL for the groups and subgroups within the sample.
No CT (childhood trauma) – participant didn’t experience childhood trauma, CT – participant experienced childhood trauma. *p<0.01 indicates significant differences between the no childhood trauma HIV-negative and no childhood trauma HIV-positive groups and no childhood trauma HIV-negative and childhood trauma HIV-positive groups. **p<0.01 indicates significant differences between childhood trauma HIV-negative and childhood trauma HIV-positive groups and childhood trauma HIV-negative and no childhood trauma HIV-positive.
Figure 2Graph depicting relative LTL in the HIV-positive group (with and without childhood trauma) as well as the HIV-negative group (with and without childhood trauma).