PURPOSE: The American Board of Medical Specialties' Performance in Practice ("Part IV") portion of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirement provides an opportunity for practicing physicians to demonstrate quality improvement (QI) competence. However, specialty boards' certification of one physician at a time does not tap into the potential of collective effort. This article shares learning from a project to help family physicians work in groups to meet their Part IV MOC requirement. METHODS: A year-long implementation and evaluation project was conducted. Initially, 348 members of a regional family physician organization were invited to participate. A second path was established through 3 health care systems and a county-wide learning collaborative. Participants were offered (1) a basic introduction to QI methods, (2) the option of an alternative Part IV MOC module using a patient experience survey to guide QI efforts, (3) practice-level improvement coaching, (4) support for collaboration and co-learning, and (5) provision of QI resources. RESULTS: More physicians participated through group (66) than individual (12) recruitment, for a total of 78 physicians in 20 practices. Participation occurred at 3 levels: individual, intrapractice, and interpractice. Within the 1-year time frame, intrapractice collaboration occurred most frequently. Interpractice and system-level collaboration has begun and continues to evolve. Physicians felt that they benefited from access to a practice coach and group process. CONCLUSIONS: Practice-level collaboration, access to a practice coach, flexibility in choosing and focusing improvement projects, tailored support, and involvement with professional affiliations can enhance the Part IV MOC process. Specialty boards are likely to discover productive opportunities from working with practices, professional organizations, and health care systems to support intra- and interpractice collaborative QI work that uses Part IV MOC requirements to motivate practice improvement.
PURPOSE: The American Board of Medical Specialties' Performance in Practice ("Part IV") portion of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirement provides an opportunity for practicing physicians to demonstrate quality improvement (QI) competence. However, specialty boards' certification of one physician at a time does not tap into the potential of collective effort. This article shares learning from a project to help family physicians work in groups to meet their Part IV MOC requirement. METHODS: A year-long implementation and evaluation project was conducted. Initially, 348 members of a regional family physician organization were invited to participate. A second path was established through 3 health care systems and a county-wide learning collaborative. Participants were offered (1) a basic introduction to QI methods, (2) the option of an alternative Part IV MOC module using a patient experience survey to guide QI efforts, (3) practice-level improvement coaching, (4) support for collaboration and co-learning, and (5) provision of QI resources. RESULTS: More physicians participated through group (66) than individual (12) recruitment, for a total of 78 physicians in 20 practices. Participation occurred at 3 levels: individual, intrapractice, and interpractice. Within the 1-year time frame, intrapractice collaboration occurred most frequently. Interpractice and system-level collaboration has begun and continues to evolve. Physicians felt that they benefited from access to a practice coach and group process. CONCLUSIONS: Practice-level collaboration, access to a practice coach, flexibility in choosing and focusing improvement projects, tailored support, and involvement with professional affiliations can enhance the Part IV MOC process. Specialty boards are likely to discover productive opportunities from working with practices, professional organizations, and health care systems to support intra- and interpractice collaborative QI work that uses Part IV MOC requirements to motivate practice improvement.
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Troyen A Brennan; Ralph I Horwitz; F Daniel Duffy; Christine K Cassel; Leslie D Goode; Rebecca S Lipner Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bijal A Balasubramanian; Sabrina M Chase; Paul A Nutting; Deborah J Cohen; Pamela A Ohman Strickland; Jesse C Crosson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Christine A Sinsky; Thomas A Sinsky; Debra Althaus; Joan Tranel; Maggie Thiltgen Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Yvonne Engels; Pieter van den Hombergh; Henk Mokkink; Henk van den Hoogen; Wil van den Bosch; Richard Grol Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Imam M Xierali; Jason C B Rinaldo; Larry A Green; Stephen M Petterson; Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore; Warren P Newton; James C Puffer Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mary C Ruhe; Sarah N Bobiak; David Litaker; Caroline A Carter; Laura Wu; Casey Schroeder; Stephen J Zyzanski; Sharon M Weyer; James J Werner; Ronald E Fry; Kurt C Stange Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2011 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: John Billimek; Shaista Malik; Dara H Sorkin; Priel Schmalbach; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2014-11-22