Literature DB >> 23471589

The persistence of epiphyseal scars in the adult tibia.

Catriona Davies1, Lucina Hackman, Sue Black.   

Abstract

Estimation of chronological age from skeletal material is dependent upon estimation of maturational stage observed. Following completion of epiphyseal fusion, a transverse radio-opaque line, termed "epiphyseal scar", may be observed in the region of the former growth plate. According to the literature, this line is likely to become obliterated shortly after completion of epiphyseal fusion. Consequently, presence of an epiphyseal scar has been interpreted as an indication of recent epiphyseal fusion; however, this has not been validated by quantitative research. A study was undertaken to determine persistence of the epiphyseal scars in a cross-sectional population of adults between 20 and 50 years of age. This study examined 1,216 radiographs of proximal and distal tibiae from both sexes and sides of the body. This study suggested that 98.05% of females and 97.74% of males retained some remnant of the epiphyseal scar at the proximal tibia whilst 92.72% of females and 92.95% of males retained some remnant of the epiphyseal scar at the distal tibia. General linear model (GLM) analysis determined that chronological age accounted for 2.7% and 7.6% of variation in persistence of the epiphyseal scar at the proximal and distal tibiae, respectively. This study suggests that obliteration of the epiphyseal scar is not as dependent on chronological age as previously thought. It is, therefore, recommended that this feature not be used as an indicator of chronological age during forensic age assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23471589     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0838-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  38 in total

1.  Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods.

Authors:  R K Bull; P D Edwards; P M Kemp; S Fry; I A Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise.

Authors:  S Ritz-Timme; C Cattaneo; M J Collins; E R Waite; H W Schütz; H J Kaatsch; H I Borrman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone.

Authors:  Ming Ding; Anders Odgaard; Frank Linde; Ivan Hvid
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Tracing prehistoric activities: musculoskeletal stress marker analysis of a Stone-Age population on the island of Gotland in the Baltic sea.

Authors:  Petra Molnar
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Fusion-lines of Bones.

Authors:  Z Cope
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1920-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Anatomical structures at risk with the proud retrograde femoral nail.

Authors:  Hans Clement; Nima Heidari; Dennis Kosuge; Wolfgang Grechenig; Norbert P Tesch; Annelie M Weinberg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Bone age estimation: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A J Cole; L Webb; T J Cole
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  The rationales of interlocking nailing of the femur, tibia, and humerus.

Authors:  R J Brumback
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bilateral asymmetry in cortical bone of the humerus and tibia-sex and age factors.

Authors:  C B Ruff; H H Jones
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.553

10.  Assessment of bone ages: is the Greulich-Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys?

Authors:  A Koc; M Karaoglanoglu; M Erdogan; M Kosecik; Y Cesur
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.524

View more
  7 in total

1.  The persistence of epiphyseal scars in the distal radius in adult individuals.

Authors:  Catriona Davies; Lucina Hackman; Sue Black
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Is the persistence of an epiphyseal scar of the knee a reliable marker of biological age?

Authors:  Maxime Faisant; Camille Rerolle; Camille Faber; Fabrice Dedouit; Norbert Telmon; Pauline Saint-Martin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals?

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Christian Ottow; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Ronald Schulz; Juan Hassu; Thomas Bajanowski; Klaus Püschel; Frank Ramsthaler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Forensic age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of the distal femur.

Authors:  Jan Alexander Krämer; Sven Schmidt; Kai-Uwe Jürgens; Markus Lentschig; Andreas Schmeling; Volker Vieth
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Accuracy of scoring of the epiphyses at the knee joint (SKJ) for assessing legal adult age of 18 years.

Authors:  Ivan Galić; Frane Mihanović; Alice Giuliodori; Federica Conforti; Mariano Cingolani; Roberto Cameriere
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  A biochemical approach for assessing cutoffs at the age thresholds of 14 and 18 years: a pilot study on the applicability of bone specific alkaline phosphatase on an Italian sample.

Authors:  Marco Tisè; Luigi Ferrante; Stefano Mora; Adriano Tagliabracci
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Bone marrow lesion severity was associated with proximal tibial inclination in early knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kyota Ishibashi; Eiji Sasaki; Seiya Ota; Tetsushi Oyama; Daisuke Chiba; Yuji Yamamoto; Eiichi Tsuda; Nozomi Uemura; Kaori Sawada; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.114

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.