Literature DB >> 27169674

A biochemical approach for assessing cutoffs at the age thresholds of 14 and 18 years: a pilot study on the applicability of bone specific alkaline phosphatase on an Italian sample.

Marco Tisè1, Luigi Ferrante2, Stefano Mora3, Adriano Tagliabracci4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of age estimation methods analyze morphological changes of specific skeletal (or dental) structures reflecting global bone development (biological parameter) in order to estimate a chronological value. This morphological and structural development is the consequence of a very active tissue metabolism and intensive modeling process which involve both bone formation and bone resorption. Several biochemical markers of bone formation and bone resorption are available, and specific biochemical tests can be performed on blood or urine samples, but such markers of bone turnover have never been employed for age estimation in living individuals for forensic purposes. The aim of this study was to ascertain the applicability of serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) concentration in the age estimation for forensic purposes. We focused on the legal age thresholds of 14 and 18 years (LAT) because, in Italy, the former is considered the minimum age for criminal responsibility and the latter defines adult age and the possibility of applying general criminal laws.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed, from a forensic point of view, BALP and Tanner stages of 202 healthy white individuals (116 females and 86 males) between the ages of 10 and 30 years. We derived a linear logistic model to estimate the probability that an individual was older or younger than LAT using two variables: BALP concentration and Tanner stages. The predictive accuracy of the test was assessed by the determination of the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC curve). The test was performed to identify a threshold (cutoff) that could be used to assign an individual to the population of those younger or older than LAT.
RESULTS: ROC curve showed that the use of both serum BALP concentration and Tanner stages has a very good level of reliability in age assessment (the area under the ROC curve, AUC, ranged from 0.918 to 0.962). Best results were obtained in the assessment of male over 18 years of age (sensibility and specificity respectively of 0.90 and 0.93 with an accuracy of 0.92). Worst results were obtained in the assessment of female over 18 years of age (sensibility and specificity respectively of 0.87 and 0.82 with an accuracy of 0.84). We also calculated the probability of the correctness in the age estimation.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of serum BALP concentration in the age assessment could be a promising and integrative method to established ones, but more research has to be done to validate the value of the proposed method in the forensic practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age estimation; Bone specific alkaline phosphatase; Forensic age diagnosis; Forensic statistics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27169674     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1382-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  50 in total

1.  Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations.

Authors:  A Schmeling; W Reisinger; D Loreck; K Vendura; W Markus; G Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist in Japanese children in Sapporo by the TW2 method.

Authors:  K Kimura
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Serum bone alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme levels in normal children and children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency: a potential marker for bone formation and response to GH therapy.

Authors:  H Tobiume; S Kanzaki; S Hida; T Ono; T Moriwake; S Yamauchi; H Tanaka; Y Seino
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age.

Authors:  H H Mincer; E F Harris; H E Berryman
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Assessment of bone ages: is the Greulich-Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys?

Authors:  A Koc; M Karaoglanoglu; M Erdogan; M Kosecik; Y Cesur
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.524

6.  Patterns of osteocalcin and bone specific alkaline phosphatase by age, gender, and race or ethnicity.

Authors:  C M Gundberg; A C Looker; S D Nieman; M S Calvo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Delay in skeletal maturity in Malawian children.

Authors:  C P Lewis; C B D Lavy; W J Harrison
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07

8.  Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography.

Authors:  Andreas Schmeling; Ronald Schulz; Walter Reisinger; Matthias Mühler; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Gunther Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Serum osteocalcin and bone and liver alkaline phosphatase isoforms in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  P Magnusson; A Häger; L Larsson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  The current state of forensic age estimation of live subjects for the purpose of criminal prosecution.

Authors:  Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Gunther Geserick; Andreas Olze
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.456

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Three-Year Longitudinal Study Comparing Bone Mass, Density, and Geometry Measured by DXA, pQCT, and Bone Turnover Markers in Children with PKU Taking L-Amino Acid or Glycomacropeptide Protein Substitutes.

Authors:  Anne Daly; Wolfgang Högler; Nicola Crabtree; Nick Shaw; Sharon Evans; Alex Pinto; Richard Jackson; Catherine Ashmore; Júlio C Rocha; Boyd J Strauss; Gisela Wilcox; William D Fraser; Jonathan C Y Tang; Anita MacDonald
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.