Literature DB >> 23470791

Comment on: How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

T A Kermani, K J Warrington.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23470791      PMCID： PMC3650269          DOI： 10.1038/eye.2013.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN： 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

Authors:  S L Levy; A D Bull; A R Nestel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Giant cell arteritis: laboratory predictors of a positive temporal artery biopsy.

Authors:  Matthew D Walvick; Michael P Walvick
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Tanaz A Kermani; Jean Schmidt; Cynthia S Crowson; Steven R Ytterberg; Gene G Hunder; Eric L Matteson; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Prevalence of a normal C-reactive protein with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Mona Parikh; Neil R Miller; Andrew G Lee; Peter J Savino; M Noel Vacarezza; Wayne Cornblath; Eric Eggenberger; Aileen Antonio-Santos; Karl Golnik; Randy Kardon; Michael Wall
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.079
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Response to comment on: how common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

Authors:  S L Levy; A D Bull; A R Nestel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.775
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.