Literature DB >> 23470790

Response to comment on: how common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

S L Levy, A D Bull, A R Nestel.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23470790      PMCID： PMC3650270          DOI： 10.1038/eye.2013.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN： 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Giant cell arteritis: validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  S S Hayreh; P A Podhajsky; R Raman; B Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

Authors:  S L Levy; A D Bull; A R Nestel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Comment on: How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis?

Authors:  T A Kermani; K J Warrington
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Giant cell arteritis: laboratory predictors of a positive temporal artery biopsy.

Authors:  Matthew D Walvick; Michael P Walvick
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Tanaz A Kermani; Jean Schmidt; Cynthia S Crowson; Steven R Ytterberg; Gene G Hunder; Eric L Matteson; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.532
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.