Literature DB >> 23469701

Visual impressions of pushing and pulling: the object perceived as causal is not always the one that moves first.

Peter A White1.   

Abstract

Stimuli were presented in which a moving object (A) contacted a stationary object (B), whereupon both objects moved back in the direction from which object A had come. When object B rapidly decelerated to a standstill, so that the two objects did not remain in contact, object B was perceived as pushing object A. Thus, even though object B only moved when contacted by object A, it was perceived as the causal object, as making something happen to object A. This is contrary to the hypothesis that the object perceived as causal is always the object that moves first. It is, however, consistent with a theoretical account, in which visual causal impressions occur through a process in which visually picked-up kinematic information is matched to stored representations, based on experiences of actions on objects, which specify forces and causality as part of the perceptual interpretation of the event.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23469701     DOI: 10.1068/p7263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  4 in total

1.  Perceived causality, force, and resistance in the absence of launching.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard; Susan E Ruppel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  The possibility of an impetus heuristic.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  The embodied dynamics of perceptual causality: a slippery slope?

Authors:  Michel-Ange Amorim; Isabelle A Siegler; Robin Baurès; Armando M Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-21

4.  Causal agency and the perception of force.

Authors:  Ralf Mayrhofer; Michael R Waldmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.