OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physician training helps decrease the amount of radiation delivered to patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stent placement. BACKGROUND: Coronary angioplasty exposes patients to high doses of ionizing radiation, possibly related to equipment misuse or inappropriate training. METHODS: Reference point air kerma (K(a,r)) and kerma area product (P(KA)) were prospectively registered during a period of 6 months in patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty with stent ad hoc. All interventionalists were then invited to an informative conference on appropriate use of radiation and changes in x-ray delivery settings. Data were recorded during the following 6 months and then compared for the whole group and for those who did or did not attend the conference. RESULTS: K(a,r) decreased from 5.44 ± 0.3 Gy (n = 106) to 3.39 ± 0.22 Gy (n = 112); P<.0001 and P(KA) decreased from 365.4 ± 21.1 Gy·cm(-2); to 233.7 ± 13.1 Gy·cm(-2); P<.0001. During the first 6 months, there were no differences in radiation emitted among physicians; however, during the second half of the study, there was a 34% difference in K(a,r) between those that attended the conference and those who did not (2.78 ± 0.23 Gy vs 4.18 ± 0.37 Gy; P=.002), regardless of the fact that both groups lowered radiation emission settings. CONCLUSION: Changes in x-ray parameters profoundly reduce the amount of radiation delivered to patients, a situation that was more evident in those who attended an informative conference. It is important to educate cardiologists in the appropriate use of modern x-ray equipment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physician training helps decrease the amount of radiation delivered to patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stent placement. BACKGROUND: Coronary angioplasty exposes patients to high doses of ionizing radiation, possibly related to equipment misuse or inappropriate training. METHODS: Reference point air kerma (K(a,r)) and kerma area product (P(KA)) were prospectively registered during a period of 6 months in patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty with stent ad hoc. All interventionalists were then invited to an informative conference on appropriate use of radiation and changes in x-ray delivery settings. Data were recorded during the following 6 months and then compared for the whole group and for those who did or did not attend the conference. RESULTS: K(a,r) decreased from 5.44 ± 0.3 Gy (n = 106) to 3.39 ± 0.22 Gy (n = 112); P<.0001 and P(KA) decreased from 365.4 ± 21.1 Gy·cm(-2); to 233.7 ± 13.1 Gy·cm(-2); P<.0001. During the first 6 months, there were no differences in radiation emitted among physicians; however, during the second half of the study, there was a 34% difference in K(a,r) between those that attended the conference and those who did not (2.78 ± 0.23 Gy vs 4.18 ± 0.37 Gy; P=.002), regardless of the fact that both groups lowered radiation emission settings. CONCLUSION: Changes in x-ray parameters profoundly reduce the amount of radiation delivered to patients, a situation that was more evident in those who attended an informative conference. It is important to educate cardiologists in the appropriate use of modern x-ray equipment.
Authors: E Kuon; S B Felix; K Weitmann; I Büchner; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; A Riad; M C Busch; K Empen Journal: Herz Date: 2014-10-04 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Moritz Seiffert; Francisco Ojeda; Kai Müllerleile; Elvin Zengin; Christoph Sinning; Christoph Waldeyer; Edith Lubos; Ulrich Schäfer; Karsten Sydow; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: James A Crowhurst; Mark Whitby; David Thiele; Toni Halligan; Adam Westerink; Suzanne Crown; Jillian Milne Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2014-08-04