Literature DB >> 23467708

Validation and reliability of distress thermometer in chinese cancer patients.

Li-Li Tang1, Ye-Ning Zhang, Ying Pang, Hai-Wei Zhang, Li-Li Song.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validation and reliability of the distress thermometer (DT) recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in Chinese cancer patients.
METHODS: A total of 574 Chinese cancer patients from Beijing Cancer Hospital completed the detection of DT, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were used to analyze the validation relative to HADS and SCL-90. The patients with DT≥4 and whose distress caused by emotional problems were interviewed with the MiNi International Neuro-psychiatric Interview (MINI) (Chinese Version 5.0). This version was used to analyze cancer patients' psychological and Psychiatric symptoms during the cancer process; 3. Another 106 cancer patients in rehabilitation stage and stable condition were asked to fill in DT two times, at the base time and after 7-10 days.
RESULTS: Data of ROC indicates that a DT cutoff score of 4 yielded AUC of 0.80 with a optimal sensitivity (0.80) and specificity (0.70) relative to HADS, and AUC of 0.83 with the greatest sensitivity (0.87) and specificity (0.72) against SCL-90. The DT also has acceptable test-retest reliability (r=0.800, P=0.000); According to the interview results, the most common psychiatric problems cancer patients have adjustment disorder, depression, and anxiety.
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that DT has acceptable overall accuracy and reliability as a screening tool for testing distress severity and specific problems causing distress in Chinese cancer patients. It is worth being used in oncology clinic, the rapid screening and interview could help caregivers to identify psychological and psychiatric problems of cancer patients and provide useful information for further treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patients; Distress thermometer; Reliability; Validation

Year:  2011        PMID: 23467708      PMCID: PMC3587535          DOI: 10.1007/s11670-011-0054-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  21 in total

1.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

2.  Improving the detection of psychiatric problems in cancer patients.

Authors:  P Maguire
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.

Authors:  J Zabora; K BrintzenhofeSzoc; B Curbow; C Hooker; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

Authors:  Ingvar Bjelland; Alv A Dahl; Tone Tangen Haug; Dag Neckelmann
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status.

Authors:  J W Yates; B Chalmer; F P McKegney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Patterns of psychiatric morbidity in a genito-urinary clinic. A validation of the Hospital Anxiety Depression scale (HAD).

Authors:  P Barczak; N Kane; S Andrews; A M Congdon; J C Clay; T Betts
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study.

Authors:  S Gessler; J Low; E Daniells; R Williams; V Brough; A Tookman; L Jones
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life.

Authors:  D Stark; M Kiely; A Smith; G Velikova; A House; P Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?

Authors:  W Söllner; A DeVries; E Steixner; P Lukas; G Sprinzl; G Rumpold; S Maislinger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer in screening for distress in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors.

Authors:  J S Hong; J Tian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Sleep status of cervical cancer patients and predictors of poor sleep quality during adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Jun Tian; Gui Lin Chen; Hai Rong Zhang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Prevalence and predictors of psychological distress among patients with thyroid cancer during transitional period in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Xin Wang; Li Zhang; Juan Li; Xuan Qin; Lan Wang; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  The influence of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on psychological distress and sleep disturbance in cancer patients.

Authors:  J S Hong; J Tian; L H Wu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Distress Thermometer for Screening Distress in Asian Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Huihui Sun; Sudip Thapa; Bangyan Wang; Xiaofen Fu; Shiying Yu
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2021-06

6.  Oncologists' perception of depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer: accuracy and relational correlates.

Authors:  Lucie Gouveia; Sophie Lelorain; Anne Brédart; Sylvie Dolbeault; Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac; Florence Cousson-Gélie; Serge Sultan
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-03-11

7.  Socioeconomic health disparities revisited: coping flexibility enhances health-related quality of life for individuals low in socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Saloni Atal; Cecilia Cheng
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Predicting the Risk of Psychological Distress among Lung Cancer Patients: Development and Validation of a Predictive Algorithm Based on Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Xu Tian; Yanfei Jin; Ling Tang; Yuan-Ping Pi; Wei-Qing Chen; Maria F Jiménez-Herrera
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  Stability and Repeatability of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) with Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Tatsiana Leclair; Anne-Sophie Carret; Yvan Samson; Serge Sultan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Performance of Distress Thermometer and Associated Factors of Psychological Distress among Chinese Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sudip Thapa; Huihui Sun; Gaurab Pokhrel; Bangyan Wang; Sanuja Dahal; Shiying Yu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.